Song Zhiwei wrote:
> Is it a bug or not?
>
It is a bug of course. I think this problem have been reported before
but I can't recall if it was resolved. You should probably contact those
that made the build for Mac you are using.
- Martin
___
Gimp-us
Is it a bug or not?
2008/11/28 Song Zhiwei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi all,
>
> I install the Mac Gimp 2.6.3. But the menu text can not be displayed,
> see the attached file.
> Could you help me?
>
> Zhiwei
>
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 7:39 AM, smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've noticed this on multiple occasions that when I scale pictures down in
> Photoshop they look noticeably better when I do the same in Gimp. The scaled
> down image PS leaves is sharp and crisp, while the Gimp scaled down i
I've noticed this on multiple occasions that when I scale pictures down in
Photoshop they look noticeably better when I do the same in Gimp. The scaled
down image PS leaves is sharp and crisp, while the Gimp scaled down is more
blurry.
Does anybody know why this is the case and if there is any s
2008/11/28 Mogens Jæger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> That should do it - I now have a working ICC profile, that I can load
> into GIMP, but how to make it work 'all over' on the desktop, is still
> to come. I have it installed on my desktop, using 2 monitors, and
> regarding the page: http://www.argyllc
doug skrev:
>
> Some of your correspondence hasn't appeared on the gimp-user list -
> I also have a Spyder2 colorimeter but haven't had it working under Linux.
> Can you give some more details and/or links?
>
Sorry - yes I have a bad habit just hitting the Reply button, and not
checking who I am
My apologies, I gave the wrong reference for where I post some of my
images, it should have been www.23hq.com/littletank. There are lots of
classifications on www.23hq.com and meetthegimp is one of them.
Norman
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists
my question was: what's best for the casual photographer whose workflow is:
camera -> gimp editing -> printing in a shop or publish in a web gallery
I'd better get and use an icm/icc profile or not?
as a casual photographer, what i did is this :
print a RGB color disc selecting R(FF00)G(0
< snip >
> > I've got a Spyder2 colorimeter, and I have it working under Linux - in
> > my case Suse 10.3 and 11. - have a look at Argyll.
> >
> > Second - A manufacturer profile can be better than just using the
> > monitor as-is, but you get a false feeling of correctness. It can still
> > be fa
Leonardo Canducci wrote:
> 2008/11/28 Mogens Jæger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Leonardo Canducci skrev:
>>> I don't plan to buy a device for monitor calibration. They're not cheap nor
>>> supported on linux, and they look like overkill for my purpose: getting
>>> acceptable color consistency across dif
2008/11/28 Mogens Jæger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Leonardo Canducci skrev:
>> I don't plan to buy a device for monitor calibration. They're not cheap nor
>> supported on linux, and they look like overkill for my purpose: getting
>> acceptable color consistency across different pcs, web galleries and l
2008/11/28 Hedley Finger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Leonardo Canducci wrote:
>>
>> 'rgb profile' is set
>> >> to 'none'.
>>
>
> I am curious. The DSLR is RGB, the monitor is RGB so why would you not want
> an RGB profile? Most reasonable inkjet printers capable of printing
> photographs do a good job
12 matches
Mail list logo
