Re: [Gimp-user] compiling woes

2007-10-26 Thread rcook
> I am attempting to compile 2.4 on a fresh Slackware 12.0 install. When I > run > ./configure, I get a message at the end about needing pygtk, but I have > pygtk installed > and the version number is high enough. Do I need some kind of development > headers and if > so, where do I get them? Yo

Re: [Gimp-user] compiling woes

2007-10-26 Thread Tom Williams
Elwin Estle wrote: > I am attempting to compile 2.4 on a fresh Slackware 12.0 install. When I run > ./configure, I get a message at the end about needing pygtk, but I have pygtk > installed > and the version number is high enough. Do I need some kind of development > headers and if > so, where

[Gimp-user] compiling woes

2007-10-26 Thread Elwin Estle
I am attempting to compile 2.4 on a fresh Slackware 12.0 install. When I run ./configure, I get a message at the end about needing pygtk, but I have pygtk installed and the version number is high enough. Do I need some kind of development headers and if so, where do I get them? ___

[Gimp-user] THE ALMIGHTY ALT KEY

2007-10-26 Thread ryanb
Why .. . Why, I ask you, on this Green Earth was the ALT Key revoked of it's power? I used to zoom around the editor, modifying my selections with the stroke of a key, but now .. . I feel like 3+ years of experience had been undone, and now I am back to square one .. . Yes, I may be exagger

Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp 2.4 released

2007-10-26 Thread Jeffery Small
Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 17:13 +, Jeffery Small wrote: >> Is there a convenient way to download a snapshot of the current manual? I >> don't see any option on the documentation or the downloads page. >http://docs.gimp.org/ has a quite prominent downloa

Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp 2.4 released

2007-10-26 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 17:13 +, Jeffery Small wrote: > Is there a convenient way to download a snapshot of the current manual? I > don't see any option on the documentation or the downloads page. http://docs.gimp.org/ has a quite prominent download link. Sven

Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp 2.4 released

2007-10-26 Thread Jeffery Small
Axel Wernicke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >we are working hard to update the manual at http://docs.gimp.org/en >as fast as we possible, some of the new features are described >already, others are still on the list... Axel: Thanks for the update. I missed ther manual at this site and was ins

Re: [Gimp-user] colour to black and white

2007-10-26 Thread norman
> You might try creating a new white layer and placing it at the bottom > of the layerstack to show the regions where your image is transparent. > At last I am beginning to understand. The white shows where before there was the grey and white squares layer. Brilliant thank you. Norman _

Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp 2.4 released

2007-10-26 Thread Leon Brooks GIMP
On Friday 26 October 2007 19:03:36 Jeffery Small wrote: > Does the new release include up-to-date documentation on new > features like the healing and perspective cloning tools? Can't recall having seen the docs but these features did do stuff when I whipped the Win32 edition into life this aftern

Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp 2.4 released

2007-10-26 Thread Axel Wernicke
Hi Jeff, we are working hard to update the manual at http://docs.gimp.org/en as fast as we possible, some of the new features are described already, others are still on the list... Greetings, lexA Am 26.10.2007 um 08:03 schrieb Jeffery Small: > Does the new release include up-to-date docume

[Gimp-user] Gimp 2.4 released

2007-10-26 Thread Jeffery Small
Does the new release include up-to-date documentation on new features like the healing and perspective cloning tools? Regards, -- Jeff ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user

Re: [Gimp-user] colour to black and white

2007-10-26 Thread norman
> Oops, I just realized that what you describe may be attributed to the > fact that GIMP will display a dark gray/light gray checkerboard to > indicate transparent regions. Perhaps you have created your lithograph > correctly but misinterpreted this representation of transparency. So, that'