On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 06:22:14 -0600, Alex Feldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is getting off the topic of the Gimp, but you've piqued my
> interest. I just took a digital photo and modified it very slightly
> with the Gimp, and used exiftool to print out the exif data for the
> original and t
Rafael i'm almost sure you will win, i was a expert of traditional photo
collage and manipulation (as in darkroom ) and at that time, if i wished i
could bypass most of detection method
But time pass by...Now i do photo collage with computer but for only artistic
purpose and so i never had reas
This is getting off the topic of the Gimp, but you've piqued my
interest. I just took a digital photo and modified it very slightly
with the Gimp, and used exiftool to print out the exif data for the
original and the modification, and diff'd the two exif outputs. The
only things I saw that might
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 05:23:13 +0200 (CEST), "Alchemie foto\\grafiche" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Raphael Quinet wrote
> _" I do not
> want to say too much about that because I do not want to give too many
> ideas to the crooks, but let's say that the way some things are split
> or ordered in the
