On Tuesday 28 February 2006 10:24 pm, scott s. wrote:
> I have some raster images that I need to combine. Each raster is
> in tiff format grayscale. What I want to do is load each file into
> a channel to create a color image. The problem is, I can't figure
> out how to get an image, or layer, i
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 09:21:15AM +0800, jed mallen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can anyone recommend a nice howto on automating batch jobs on gimp
> (ie: resizing, border, etc.)?
>
i have put some stuff on my site. the old (gimp-2.0-2.2) stuff should
be at http://carol.gimp.org/gimp2/resources/python/
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:14:52 +0100
Denny Schierz wrote:
> hi,
>
> i have a small wacom tablet and i want to copy a (fantasy) map from
> paper. The printed map has nearly the same size, like the wacom has.
...
> My document has 1000 mm x 1000 mm.
You have a 1m x 1m Wacom tablet? And you consid
I have some raster images that I need to combine. Each raster is in tiff
format grayscale. What I want to do is load each file into a channel
to create a color image. The problem is, I can't figure out how to get
an image, or layer, into a channel. I can load a single image, and
convert it int
Hello,
Can anyone recommend a nice howto on automating batch jobs on gimp
(ie: resizing, border, etc.)?
Thanks!
--
Jed R. Mallen
GPG key ID: 81E575A3 fp: 4E1E CBA5 7E6A 2F8B 8756 660A E54C 39D6 81E5 75A3
http://jed.sitesled.com
___
Gimp-user mailing l
Hi Folks I recently downloaded GIMP and I am new to it. Please advise how you would attempt this: I have a gif image of some text eg This is my Goldfish. I wish to now highlight it as follows: This is my Goldfish I think the first step would be to create a rectangle aroun
Thanks, guys.
The clone tool is a very effective tool at photo restoration. If you
have a damaged region of the image, a lace collar, for example, the
clone tool will allow you to rebuild the damages area without having to
draw the lace yourself but by copying it from the other sections.
I
On Feb 28, 2006, at 4:18 AM, Michael Schumacher wrote:
Von: "Xavier Sala" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Does anybody know if it possible (and if it is, how) to create an
image
from a given photo but at the same time the new photo image should
be made
from other pictures (around 100 pictures).
The
JC Dill wrote:
Michael Schumacher wrote:
JC Dill wrote:
So when someone asks you to tell them how wonderful "this forum" is,
you can assume they are inviting comparison with all other forums on the
topic, not just other mailing lists.
Well, this is a mailing list. Anyone who uses it via a di
while i am not interested in excluding GIMP from collections of software
that people call *OSS, there is certainly a lot of confusion involving
*OSS advocates when it comes to the expectations of them about what gimp
developers and volunteers will do.
here is one point. people coming here from OS
Michael Schumacher wrote:
JC Dill wrote:
So when someone asks you to tell them how wonderful "this forum" is,
you can assume they are inviting comparison with all other forums on the
topic, not just other mailing lists.
Well, this is a mailing list. Anyone who uses it via a different access
v
JC Dill wrote:
> So when someone asks you to tell them how wonderful "this forum" is,
> you can assume they are inviting comparison with all other forums on the
> topic, not just other mailing lists.
Well, this is a mailing list. Anyone who uses it via a different access
vector should be aware of
Michael Schumacher wrote:
Von: Robert Citek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
But enough trash talk about Gimpshop. Tell me how wonderful this
forum is. What makes this forum shine?
Well, I'd be more happy to answer this if you drop "forum" and use "list"
instead.
fo·rum Pronunciation (fôrm, fr-)
n
Bram Kuijper wrote:
> Sure? Again, doesn't it say something about general usability of
> GIMP's GUI? A good GUI is characterized that it is 'understandable' by
> the great majority of users, inexperienced, experienced using other
> software platforms and experienced using GIMP. I work with GIMP dai
hi,
i have a small wacom tablet and i want to copy a (fantasy) map from
paper. The printed map has nearly the same size, like the wacom has.
The problem, if i follow the lines on the printed map, i get out the
gimp document. Actually the screen resolution is the same, like the
wacom field.
My d
> Von: Bram Kuijper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Do I hear "I don't care about Photoshop/Windows Users that want to
> transfer to GIMP?"... then why was GIMP compiled for windows at all, just
> for a bunch people that were patient enough to learn it?
FYI, it was compiled for windows because someone w
Rikard Johnels wrote:
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 06:17, Carol Spears wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 09:01:30PM -0800, Carol Spears wrote:
gimp (the way it was made) is a much better way to learn image
manipulation. one more time, if changing from photoshop to gimp
Selon Michael Schumacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Von: Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > If it was put in bugzilla, the patch would have been
> > refused, or we would have asked him to work on it.
>
> That's how things are handled in Bugzilla, so what is the problem?
The guy scratched an itch.
> Von: "Xavier Sala" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Does anybody know if it possible (and if it is, how) to create an image
> from a given photo but at the same time the new photo image should be made
> from other pictures (around 100 pictures).
The first hit when googling for "gimp photomosaic":
ht
> Von: Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> If it was put in bugzilla, the patch would have been
> refused, or we would have asked him to work on it.
That's how things are handled in Bugzilla, so what is the problem?
> So why worry? I'm happy to see this kind of thing happenning around the
> GIMP.
Hi,
Does anybody know if it possible (and if it is, how)
to create an image from a given photo but at the same time the new photo image
should be made from other pictures (around 100 pictures). That will create the
effect that looking at the image from away you see the main photo, but g
> Von: Robert Citek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Feb 28, 2006, at 12:20 AM, Manish Singh wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 12:01:05AM -0600, Robert Citek wrote:
> >> Would you consider Gimpshop a successful fork?
> >
> > Considering Gimpshop can't even keep their own website online, I'd
> > say no.
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 06:17, Carol Spears wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 09:01:30PM -0800, Carol Spears wrote:
> > gimp (the way it was made) is a much better way to learn image
> > manipulation. one more time, if changing from photoshop to gimp is a
> > problem and changing from gimp to p
Hi,
Selon Manish Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> For Gimpshop, it was all about forking from the get go. There was no
> discussion, no proposal in any of the several places to discuss GIMP
> development. No other possibilities were attempted.
Put things in perspective - the guy wrote a patch. It's
24 matches
Mail list logo
