[Gimp-user] Xsane & Gimp

Context: pentium 4, kde 3.3.2, the very last build of linux gentoo compiled from scratch; gimp 2.0.4, xsane 0.96, xscanimage 1.0.13; epson usb scanner Both xsane and xscanimage alone work smoothly with the usb scanner. The directories /ushr/lib/gimp/2.0/plug-ins/ and  /usr/local/lib/gimp-2.0/

Re: [Gimp-user] sub part 2

On Fri, 28 Jan 2005, Matthew H. Plough wrote: > Sorry for replying to my own message, but I did a quick test. Here's > the result of my Blender operations: > > http://www.princeton.edu/~mplough/tmp/submarine.jpg Well my contribution is from the Gimp, using a blend FG->Bg (white/black) and the

Re: [Gimp-user] sub part 2

Sorry for replying to my own message, but I did a quick test. Here's the result of my Blender operations: http://www.princeton.edu/~mplough/tmp/submarine.jpg Matt Matthew H. Plough wrote: Jim Clark wrote: I realized I did not make the most important issue clear. I want it 3D in both directions.

Re: [Gimp-user] sub part 2

Jim Clark wrote: I realized I did not make the most important issue clear. I want it 3D in both directions...not just top to bottom (which even I can do) but also tapering towards the tips. So it really looks as if it is rounded at the ends as well as fat in the middle. Sorry for the lack of cla

[Gimp-user] Re: Build a submarine in your spare time

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2005-01-28 at 1704.41 -0600): > I want to create what I can only describe as a submarine shape. I want a > cylinder that is rounded on the ends and looks 3D. Just a left to right > view, no angles no perspective. Boy, I sure don't know how to do this. Can > anyone point? Make th

[Gimp-user] sub part 2

I realized I did not make the most important issue clear. I want it 3D in both directions...not just top to bottom (which even I can do) but also tapering towards the tips. So it really looks as if it is rounded at the ends as well as fat in the middle. Sorry for the lack of clarity. Thanks again

[Gimp-user] Build a submarine in your spare time

I want to create what I can only describe as a submarine shape. I want a cylinder that is rounded on the ends and looks 3D. Just a left to right view, no angles no perspective. Boy, I sure don't know how to do this. Can anyone point? Thanks- Jim Clark

[Gimp-user] Gegl

What about Gegl when will this happen? Richard ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user

Re: [Gimp-user] Best performance on 4000x2200 pixel images.

Dana Silbera wrote: > In any case, the specific problem I'm getting is while colour balancing > of the final image, and each shift of the slider requires a bit over 20 > seconds to complete the colour change over the image, which seems > slower than it should be. It's just a little difficult to r

Re: [Gimp-user] Best performance on 4000x2200 pixel images.

Hi Dana! I am afraid you've hit a design issue with the GIMP - when adjusting colors via tools, i t simply operates on the whole image for each preview step. The options let to you right now are workarounds: Either select a small part of the image, preview on that part, hit cancel, select all

[Gimp-user] Best performance on 4000x2200 pixel images.

I'm having what seem to be performance issues with editing some images about 4000x2200 pixels (they're panoramas of multiple photos), and would like some advice on the best settings in GIMP for RAM use, or whether what I'm seeing is normal. I have 640MB in this machine, and GIMP is set to use a

Re: [Gimp-user] Version 2.2 Gimp

Hi Richard, Richard wrote: > Thanks, > but neither link answers my question, > on bit's ( color depth ) Well, they kind of do (in that, if the GIMP were 16 bits per channel now, it would have been in the release notes). The short answer is no, we aren't. Cheers, Dave. -- David Neary,