hi i want to move the bottom border of the image up how do i do that with gimp ?
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 01:37:33AM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
> You need to update libexif and you should also by all means update
> GIMP to version 2.0.6 or at least 2.0.5.
Thanks Sven, after updating libexif I can load those files. I will
update GIMP when I have the time, probably next weeken
On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 03:51:49AM +0100, Gert Cuykens wrote:
> hi i want to make the background transparent, when i add the alpha
> thingie and save the picture as png IE show some kind of blue stuff as
> background ?
Internet Explorer doesn't support PNG Alpha channels by itself. There
are hack
hi i want to make the background transparent, when i add the alpha
thingie and save the picture as png IE show some kind of blue stuff as
background ?
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Boy, I wish I could program, or compile my own code.
I'm glad the bug was found, and now can be fix.
I'll sit and wait for a new 2.2 Mac OS X version ( hopeful before x-mas)
to download it.
Thank You.
Richard
Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote:
On Sunday 21 November 2004 13:54, Richard wrote:
I n
On Sunday 21 November 2004 18:31, Thadeu Penna wrote:
> Em Sex, 2004-11-19 às 17:27 -0200, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris
escreveu:
> > Hi.
> >
> > There is an easy way to draw circles and basic shapes. It just is
> > not aparent by trial and error - the "tips of the day" could
> > point you there.
>
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 12:00:20 -0800 (PST),
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is actually a misunderstanding. The official GIMP releases are
> source code releases only. There are no official binary releases for
> any platform whatsoever. Fortunately there are a few people who are
Em Sex, 2004-11-19 às 17:27 -0200, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris escreveu:
> Hi.
>
> There is an easy way to draw circles and basic shapes. It just is not
> aparent by trial and error - the "tips of the day" could point you
> there.
>
> Just create a circular selection (by holding shift after you
Hi,
Napoleon Ahiable <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> this is just a concern that i have with the fact that realeses for
> gimp for windows still lacks behind the official realease on the
> site http://gimp-win.sourceforge.net/. I am not complaining its just
> that if possible i would like to know w
Hi,
"Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The pixel size of the image doesn't change - that means you still have
> the "L" value for each pixel in your original image.
> You can just change the DPI settings (in gimp 2.2 pre2 it is done in
> the new "print size" dialog.
>
On Sunday 21 November 2004 13:54, Richard wrote:
> I notice when doing a decompose,
> that you get 3 channels A&B&L...
> However, there a issue.
>
> First if the image is 300dpi x 300dpi
> then you delete A&B channel have only the L
> channel, you will notice that the image,
> is no longer 300dpi x
On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 03:47:16AM -0800, Napoleon Ahiable wrote:
> Hi, this is just a concern that i have with the fact that realeses for
> gimp for windows still lacks behind the official realease on the site
> http://gimp-win.sourceforge.net/. I am not complaining its just that if
> possible i w
> I have been using GIMP for several years and just encountered a problem
> that I had never seen before. I just bought a Canon Digital Rebel
> (300D) and GIMP 2.0.0 is unable to open the JPEG files that it produces.
Most likely you are using a Linux distro (such as SuSE 9.1) that has
a buggy v
I notice when doing a
decompose,
that you get 3 channels A&B&L...
However, there a issue.
First if the image is 300dpi x 300dpi
then you delete A&B channel have only the L
channel, you will notice that the image,
is no longer 300dpi x 300dpi but,
72x72 dpi.
is my understanding correct on this
Hi,
Sven Neumann wrote:
> Napoleon Ahiable <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I have no idea how to build a gimp windows package so the last think i
> > would do is be ungrateful to Jernej Semoncic. I actually like to thank
> > him for what he's done.
>
> I guess it would help if someone could post
Hi,
Napoleon Ahiable <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi, this is just a concern that i have with the fact that realeses for
> gimp for windows still lacks behind the official realease on the site
> http://gimp-win.sourceforge.net/. I am not complaining its just that if
> possible i would like to kn
Hi, this is just a concern that i have with the fact that realeses for
gimp for windows still lacks behind the official realease on the site
http://gimp-win.sourceforge.net/. I am not complaining its just that if
possible i would like to know why that is the case.
For example as at today, the sta
> Yes. GIMP 2.0 does keep the EXIF info w/o altering it. That EXIF info
> can contain a thumbnail image. If you edit the JPEG file with GIMP 2.0
> it will not change the thumbnail image.
Thanks for the info!
--
Milos Prudek
_
Most websites are
confused chintzy gaudy conflicting tack
18 matches
Mail list logo
