[Gimp-user] prebuilt binaries for Fedora Core 2 & 1

2004-10-05 Thread Ben Liblit
The Cooperative Bug Isolation Project is a joint effort by UC Berkeley and Stanford to bring debugging into the Internet age. Instrumented applications send feedback to our analysis center, where we use statistical debugging techniques to learn what goes wrong when the software crashes. The projec

Re: [Gimp-user] Re: Gimp-user Digest, Vol 25, Issue 6

2004-10-05 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris
On Tuesday 05 October 2004 16:08, Szasz Pal wrote: > > Contributors: > > > >Michael Natterer, Sven Neumann, David Odin, Maurits Rijk, Dave > > Neary, Manish Singh, Robert Oegren, Kevin Cozens, Kevin Turner, > > Dov Grobgeld, Joao S. O. Bueno, Michael Schumacher, Jonathan > > Levi, Daniel Egger

[Gimp-user] Re: Gimp-user Digest, Vol 25, Issue 6

2004-10-05 Thread Szasz Pal
> Contributors: > >Michael Natterer, Sven Neumann, David Odin, Maurits Rijk, Dave Neary, >Manish Singh, Robert Oegren, Kevin Cozens, Kevin Turner, Dov Grobgeld, >Joao S. O. Bueno, Michael Schumacher, Jonathan Levi, Daniel Egger Hehe... this is a joke, or there is really another

Re: [Gimp-user] Poor print quality with GIMP on Linux

2004-10-05 Thread Shawn Willden
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 05 October 2004 11:27 am, Sven Neumann wrote: > I replied to the list (and to you) so the discussion has been on-list > all the time... Apparently my filters are putting your replies in my Inbox, rather than in my GIMP folder. I'll have t

Re: [Gimp-user] Poor print quality with GIMP on Linux

2004-10-05 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Shawn Willden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > (I hope you don't mind if I post this back to the list, Sven) I replied to the list (and to you) so the discussion has been on-list all the time... > Well, I didn't post there because I'm not using the gimp-print > drivers. The gimp-print drives

Re: [Gimp-user] Poor print quality with GIMP on Linux

2004-10-05 Thread Shawn Willden
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 (I hope you don't mind if I post this back to the list, Sven) On Tuesday 05 October 2004 09:04 am, you wrote: > > I have been seeing the blurriness without scaling up to the full > > size of the page, as would happen if Scaling was really at 100%. > >

[Gimp-user] Re: [Gimp-announce] ANNOUNCE: GIMP 2.1.6 Development Release

2004-10-05 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Here's an overview of the changes since 2.1.6 was released: That should read "since 2.1.5 was released", of course. Sven ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman

Re: [Gimp-user] Poor print quality with GIMP on Linux

2004-10-05 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Shawn Willden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > As Sven pointed out in private e-mail, I misstated here. That's > what I get from going from memory. My goal is to avoid scaling (and > the quality reduction that may occur), so what I've been doing is > using the "Use Original Image Size" button

[Gimp-user] ANNOUNCE: GIMP 2.1.6 Development Release

2004-10-05 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, a new development snapshot of GIMP 2.1 is now available from ftp.gimp.org and it's mirrors: http://gimp.org/downloads/#mirrors Actually we wanted to have the first pre-release for 2.2 out by now but there are still a couple of minor API and UI changes that need to be done. So this is anot

Re: [Gimp-user] Poor print quality with GIMP on Linux

2004-10-05 Thread Shawn Willden
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 04 October 2004 10:04 pm, Shawn Willden wrote: > "Scaling" is set to 100.0%. As Sven pointed out in private e-mail, I misstated here. That's what I get from going from memory. My goal is to avoid scaling (and the quality reduction that m

Re: [Gimp-user] Poor print quality with GIMP on Linux

2004-10-05 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Shawn Willden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Any ideas what I can do to fix this? I have the GIMP's Image/Output > Settings set to all the defaults (Image Type: Photograph, Output: > Type Color, all the parameters on the Adjust Output dialog to > "1.000"). I'm careful to ensure that I don't