hi,
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 11:40:18PM -0400, moonchaser wrote:
> I'm going to sample the Gimp software later, but I'm
> wondering... despite that the program is free (the
> source anyway), if I create or doctor images using the
> program which will be put up on a website, in my case,
> they are ca
moonchaser wrote:
I'm going to sample the Gimp software later, but I'm
wondering... despite that the program is free (the
source anyway), if I create or doctor images using the
program which will be put up on a website, in my case,
they are cartoon images on a comic site, is it legal?
The images th
I'm going to sample the Gimp software later, but I'm
wondering... despite that the program is free (the
source anyway), if I create or doctor images using the
program which will be put up on a website, in my case,
they are cartoon images on a comic site, is it legal?
The images themselves will not
hi,
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 02:45:29PM -0400, Rick Pasotto wrote:
> I have a fairly simple gif image that has various shades of brown. I'd
> like to have the same image but with various shades of grey instead.
> What would be the easiest way of doing this? Is there an algorithmic way
> of convertin
Rick Pasotto wrote:
> I have a fairly simple gif image that has various shades of
> brown. I'd like to have the same image but with various shades
> of grey instead. What would be the easiest way of doing this?
> Is there an algorithmic way of converting the brown range to a
> grey range? Gi
Maybe you want to try another distro. On my Debian box, I typed
apt-get install gimp
and it got installed. No problem there.
Somewhere I read recently that if you switch to Debian, you'll be asking
yourself "Why didn't I do this sooner?"I can vouch for that.
A lot of times you see somebody sa
On Sun, 2004-06-13 at 11:45, Rick Pasotto wrote:
> I have a fairly simple gif image that has various shades of brown. I'd
> like to have the same image but with various shades of grey instead.
> What would be the easiest way of doing this? Is there an algorithmic way
> of converting the brown range
Michael Schumacher wrote:
I have only done a bit of checking into the newer distros, but isn't
FC2 a 64 bit OS? That would make it incompatible with my PIII 550,
correct?
Don't start spreading FUD. From http://fedora.redhat.com
Sorry, no FUD intended. The info I got:
CPU Requirements
This sec
Off the top of my head: change the image to RGB (Image:Mode:RGB ?). From here
on you have a few options. For instance, Layer:Colors:Hue/Saturation and dial
saturation way down. If you want you could also change the hue instead and
turn the brown shades into shades of another color. Then save you
Barton Bosch wrote:
John Dietsch wrote:
On Sat, 12 Jun 2004, Barton Bosch wrote:
Should I take it that installing the new GIMP on FC1 is not
significantly easier than on rh 9 (shrike)?
It is the same.
What are people's experiences re: GIMP 2.x and FC1? Is it the same
nightmare of rebuildin
I have a fairly simple gif image that has various shades of brown. I'd
like to have the same image but with various shades of grey instead.
What would be the easiest way of doing this? Is there an algorithmic way
of converting the brown range to a grey range? Given that I could easily
change the va
John Dietsch wrote:
On Sat, 12 Jun 2004, Barton Bosch wrote:
Should I take it that installing the new GIMP on FC1 is not
significantly easier than on rh 9 (shrike)?
It is the same.
What are people's experiences re: GIMP 2.x and FC1? Is it the
same nightmare of rebuilding gtk2? Or is it be
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 01:36:18PM -0400, Robert Krueger wrote:
> >On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, Greg Rundlett wrote:
> >>
> >>The point is this.it doesn't matter *why* it is difficult, it
> >>matters that it *is* difficult. The result is that people will not use
> >>the GIMP unless they are on Windo
> This is like deja-vu. I recently completed a thread with the
> exact same scenario, only using SuSe linux 9.0.My wife downloaded
> Gimp 2.01 on her Dell XP laptop, and it works...bingo! No problems, no
> configurations, no dependencies, no bulls---, it just works. I'm still
> screw
John Dietsch wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, Greg Rundlett wrote:
rob wrote:
Rember you need all the -dev rpms if you want to compile stuff.
It would be a much much beter idea for you to install the rpm. Ditching
suse for debian would also be a good idea.
I too had literally the worst ex
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 02:34:36PM +0200, Tatar Kolos wrote:
> > > What are people's experiences re: GIMP 2.x and FC1? Is it the
> > > same nightmare of rebuilding gtk2? Or is it better than rh 9?
> >
> > I tried it.
> > There are 79 packages involed.
> > If you are not an expert do not tr
> > What are people's experiences re: GIMP 2.x and FC1? Is it the
> > same nightmare of rebuilding gtk2? Or is it better than rh 9?
>
> I tried it.
> There are 79 packages involed.
> If you are not an expert do not try it.
> If you are running RH9 or FC1 you can upgrade to FC2.
> If yo
17 matches
Mail list logo
