Re: [Gimp-user] Terrible time to get 2.01 running

Greg Rundlett wrote: With other platforms or distros, you're potentially going to run into "blockers". These are issues that GIMP developers/testers/volunteers might want to address in a) an install script (if that is even possible) or b) an install guide. I expect the more 'polished' softwar

Re: [Gimp-user] Terrible time to get 2.01 running

Greg Rundlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: My hope is that the 'tricks' to installing on these notoriously difficult distributions can be added to GIMP.org. For example: Compiling from source is not recommended unless you know about X, Y, and Z. To learn more about X, Y, and Z, go here. You need

[Gimp-user] RE;Re;install probs

Bandit Pat wrote, Winton, I'm no Mandrake expert by any means, but this error sounds like you are missing some needed GTK+ files. I suspect MDK 10 only installed the Gnome files needed to run most programs, but didn't some that Gimp needed. Just a guess, not certain. I would think when trying

Re: [Gimp-user] Terrible time to get 2.01 running

Hi, Greg Rundlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > My hope is that the 'tricks' to installing on these notoriously > difficult distributions can be added to GIMP.org. For example: > Compiling from source is not recommended unless you know about X, Y, > and Z. To learn more about X, Y, and Z, go he

[Gimp-user] Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: Usability test - Results available

>From: Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >gimp has been able to do this since gimp-1.0.2 that i know of. Good. Anyone has used it to make the screenshots? I would like to take a look. Juhana ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xc

[Gimp-user] Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: Usability test - Results available

On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 09:35:32PM +0300, Juhana Sadeharju wrote: > >From:Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >If you are still using GIMP 1.2.3 then we don't want to hear from you > >on the gimp-developer list. Update to 2.0 (at least) or keep quiet. > > Hey, I just wanted to point out

Re: [Gimp-user] Making an image with a white background transparent?

On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 09:05:10AM -0700, dreadnought wrote: > > Thanks for the reply! I've been trying all the suggestions I've been > getting through this mailing list, and still have not been able to get the > background of my test image transparent. Here's the link again for the > image I'm

Re: [Gimp-user] Making an image with a white background transparent?

I was able to make the white background transparent following this procedure using Gimp 2.0.1 on Linux. This procedure should be platform independent and possibly release independent: 1) Open the image 2) On the "Layers" dialog, create a new transparent layer 3) Click on the "Background" lay

RE: [Gimp-user] Making an image with a white background transparent?

Hi Steve, Thanks for the reply! I've been trying all the suggestions I've been getting through this mailing list, and still have not been able to get the background of my test image transparent. Here's the link again for the image I'm working on: http://www.pelican.com/imatges/3cases_1620.jpg

Re: [Gimp-user] Terrible time to get 2.01 running

rob wrote: Rember you need all the -dev rpms if you want to compile stuff. It would be a much much beter idea for you to install the rpm. Ditching suse for debian would also be a good idea. I too had literally the worst experience thus far in my Linux life trying to install GIMP 2.0 on a Fedor

Re: [Gimp-user] install probs

On Friday 11 June 2004 11:11 am, squareyes wrote: > Hi all, > I had Gimp 2 up and running (from gimp-2.0.0-richard.1mdk.i586.rpm) > on Mandrake 10, which was installed as an update from Man 9.1. > Installed Gimp 2.0 with no probs, but have since had to reformat. > Installed Mandrake 10 as a fresh

[Gimp-user] German spam mails with xenophobic content

Hi, you probably have seen some strange mails in German being sent to the gimp mailing-lists recently and/or you might have received such mails that appeared to have been sent with gimp.org email addresses. Well, you all have received spam and worm mails before but these mails are not obviously re

Re: [Gimp-user] Build probs w/2.1

Hi, "Eric Pierce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I just upgrade to SuSE 9.1. > I grabbed the following rpms from www.usr-local-bin.org: > gtk-2.4.2 (plus devel) > ATK 1.6.0 (plus devel) > Glib 2.4.2 (plus devel) > Pango 1.4.0 (plus devel) > > 'configure' goes smoothly, but during 'make' it craps

Re: [Gimp-user] Build probs w/2.1

Hi, Patrick Shanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Eric Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [06-10-04 18:31]: > > I just upgrade to SuSE 9.1. > > I grabbed the following rpms from www.usr-local-bin.org: > ... > > make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/dit/downloads/gimp-2.1.0' > > make: *** [all] Error 2 > .