Hi,
Khiraly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sven wanted me to work on a new set of brushes
>
> >From Photoshop:
> I have saved all the brush, but in Photoshop7 the brush cannot be edited
> (I can only delete, rename and create a new, but cant edite).
> The other problem, that in ps isnt the same
Hi,
somewhat late at night I wrote:
> I also did give you the link to the charcoal brushes with the
> intention that you redistribute these brushes in any way.
This should of course have read: "I also did _not_ give you the
link...".
Sven
___
Gimp-us
Hi!
Sven wanted me to work on a new set of brushes
>From Photoshop:
I have saved all the brush, but in Photoshop7 the brush cannot be edited
(I can only delete, rename and create a new, but cant edite).
The other problem, that in ps isnt the same all the cast of brush.
So I have made many click
Hi,
Sam Jones wrote:
> Here's some comments of mine:
>
> 1) There's a cost to download WinGIMP 2.0.
Only if you download it through wingimp.com. That is a private
business operation, and Mat has donated money to the project in
the past. Given that Jernej provides a free installer now, I
don't k
Hi,
Sam Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1) There's a cost to download WinGIMP 2.0. Who gets this money? My
> initial assumption was that it was the GIMP foundation, and, if so,
> I've got no trouble making that donation. I just caught that it's
> available for free download at
> http://ww
t the start, I just wanted to say how much I liked GIMP 2.0. I love the
new handling of text. I really like the docks. I find paths much
easier to work with. I'm having lots of fun doing animations with GAP.
It's a lot of nice work.
Here's some comments of mine:
1) There's a cost to down
Good point.
I was also wondering if and when we might get 'embedded layers' as well.
Tom
On Friday 02 Apr 2004 12:03 am, Baard Ove Kopperud wrote:
> I must shamefully admit that I have yet to try GIMP 2.0, so
> if adjustments-layers is part of it, then I appolegize for
> post.
>
> +++
>
> I've b
On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Hi!
>
> With gimp-2.0 I cannot get gimp script-fu working from the cmdline:
>
> (define (script-fu-fileload txt)
[..]
> But on the cmdline:
> gimp --no-data -i --verbose -b '(script-fu-fileload 0 "foobar")'
[..]
Why does you define it with one ar
