* On Thursday 09 January 2003 12:22 pm, zeus wrote:
> I notice that every time, i create new folder in nautilus. I can not
> directly mov/cut/paste/copy in to new folder (the one i created). In
> order to do that, i must refresh Nutilus to do that.
>
> Is this some kind lack of Nautilus??
--==
I think I found it over on the ImageMagick user list...
Try this:
mogrify -density 96 foo.tiff
Instead of 96 use whatever you want the resolution to be.
Good luck!
--
Jon Winters O O O O O O O
"History Will Prove us right"
http://www
Thanks to Jon for the suggestion.
Jon's approach (using mogrify's -density option) does indeed result in the
desired change to the file. I was surprised to find that this worked, since
the docs indicate that -density only applies to decoding of PS and PDF
files...?
Unfortunately using mogrify in
I notice that every time, i create new folder in nautilus. I can not directly
mov/cut/paste/copy in to new folder (the one i created). In order to do that,
i must refresh Nutilus to do that.
Is this some kind lack of Nautilus??
--
Zeus ;]
PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE US FROM YOUR E-MAIL.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
THANKS YOU
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
I was happily working away with Gimp 1.2.3 with an image that had
several layers.
The image was in Gimp .XCF format.
I saved and closed the image.
I came back to the image later and tried to reopen it only to get the
message:
XCF: This file is corrupt! I have loaded as much
of it as I can, bu
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 08:42:51AM +, sam ende wrote:
> On Thursday 09 January 2003 04:02, Jon Winters wrote:
>
> > Check the settings on your tile cache. Mine is set to 128MB and I think
> > the default was a woefull 32MB.
>
> cache is set to 256, i wanted to do more but it wouldn't let me,
Oops! Sorry Kevin! My brain took a wrong turn. ha!
Fred
On Thursday 09 January 2003 06:20, you wrote:
> But Fred, that requires me to load the image into the GIMP first, which I
> can't do because something about the image's physical dimension is too
> large. I need to adjust the resolution BE
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 01:52:18AM -0600, Kevin Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think that perhaps this can be accomplished with ImageMagick, but I don't
> seem to be able to figure out the proper command line parameters.
Well, you can't do it with ImageMagick ;) It does read the image in,
an
Hi Sven,
Thanks for your reply. My tile cache size is set to 1GB (I have 1.5GB of
RAM), which should theoretically help based on your comments. Also, upon
further testing I have found that the problem I am encountering seems to be
related to the physical dimensions of the image, rather than the
But Fred, that requires me to load the image into the GIMP first, which I
can't do because something about the image's physical dimension is too
large. I need to adjust the resolution BEFORE loading into the GIMP...
s/KAM
- Original Message -
From: "Fred Bazolo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
sam ende wrote:
On Thursday 09 January 2003 04:31, Kevin Myers wrote:
2. Would anyone out there care to suggest a readily available commercial
Linux distribution that is extremely easy to install, learn, and use for
unsophisticated users with primarily Windblows experience?
mandrake, is a bi
hey Kevin,
Just do "Image" -> "Scale Image" and adjust the dpi accordingly. That seems to
work.
Fred
On Wednesday 08 January 2003 23:52, Kevin Myers wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Does anyone out there happen to know of a utility that can simply change
> the image resolution values that are imbedded in
On Thursday 09 January 2003 04:31, Kevin Myers wrote:
> 2. Would anyone out there care to suggest a readily available commercial
> Linux distribution that is extremely easy to install, learn, and use for
> unsophisticated users with primarily Windblows experience?
mandrake, is a bit bloated but e
On Thursday 09 January 2003 03:36, Fred Bazolo wrote:
> from sam ende, Thu, 9 Jan 2003 01:42:19 +:
>
> When my file gets to be about 100 megs in size, it is hard to get any work
> done.
yes, so i end up copying visable and paste as new to work on that, that also
helps with the undo, cos its
On Thursday 09 January 2003 02:10, Fred Bazolo wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 January 2003 20:42, sam ende wrote:
>
> What do you call a large image?
one that slows doen my machine, of course. :)
k6/2+500 processor and 440mb memory
sammi
___
Gimp-user maili
On Thursday 09 January 2003 04:02, Jon Winters wrote:
> How large are your large images? I can toss 2MB (JPEG) 2560x1920 images
> around all day and my computer doesn't miss a tick.
4000x5 0r 6, its the layers that make it big, sometimes i have 10 or more
layers. xcf not jpeg, same image a
17 matches
Mail list logo
