Hello,
there is a problem with the G400 and the version of the Matrox Gx00 accel
sublib for KGI in the CVS tree right now. "copybox" is erroneous and
freezes the target display. The computer is still usable, but the
associated head is... problematic to use (unless you love to work in text
mode whi
> > Hi,
> >
> > Here are the results I get on a Radeon 7500 with KGI and the Radeon
> > sublib:
> >
> > 1024x768 (1024x768) // 16bit
> > ggiDrawPixel: 481517 pixels/second
> > ggiDrawLine:89335 lines/second
> > ggiDrawHLine: 308350 lines/second
> > ggiDrawVLine: 115966 lines/second
> >
Hello,
here is some corrected output for G200 hardware with:
- hw accel for Putc with the simple 8x8 fixed width font (and also
copybox, but it is not tested there...)
- some personal updates to the KGI target to have it load pixela
directbuffer functions (those that sync with an hw accelerator)
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Paul Redmond wrote:
> Yeah, the KGI Radeon accelerator is PIO only. Once DMA'd ring buffers are
> implemented it will fly!
It will not necessarily be so much faster, it may be your system CPU load
that drops. Anyway, that's free horsepower to do more beautiful or more
accu
Hi,
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, Andreas Beck wrote:
> Who. Assuming from the CopyBox value, that Paul's machine is rather slow
> processor-wise, I'd say KGI proves that is pretty much rocks already.
>
It sure does rock! :) My test box is a celeron 466 so it certainly is not
the speediest of processors.
> at 2... :-) However, I'm pretty impressed by the fbdev figure (nearly 25%
> faster with a higher color depth). Is it using AGP?
Yeap. It's an AGP card, but only using the stock matroxfb capabilities
(i.e. the fbdev accel sublib is banging at the regs via mmap).
CU, ANdy
--
= Andreas Beck
> Rodolphe Andy(X) (fbdev) Paul(KGI)
> > ggiDrawPixel: 333598103506 747910 481517
> > ggiDrawLine:61823 11143 104503 89335
> > ggiDrawHLine: 210260 47512 268455 308350
> > ggiDrawVLine: 90723 15661 170163 115966
> > ggiDrawBox: 5918 379
> Hi,
>
> Here are the results I get on a Radeon 7500 with KGI and the Radeon
> sublib:
>
> 1024x768 (1024x768) // 16bit
> ggiDrawPixel: 481517 pixels/second
> ggiDrawLine:89335 lines/second
> ggiDrawHLine: 308350 lines/second
> ggiDrawVLine: 115966 lines/second
> ggiDrawBox: 21009
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Rodolphe Ortalo wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Andreas Beck wrote:
>
> > Not bad. On (unaccelerated) XGGI on fbdev I get at 1024x768x24 (running
> > on 1600x1200 - i.e. high VideoOut Memory bandwidth demands) on a PIII/800
>
> Oops, sorry. I was running at 1024x768x16 (no
Hi,
Here are the results I get on a Radeon 7500 with KGI and the Radeon
sublib:
1024x768 (1024x768) // 16bit
ggiDrawPixel: 481517 pixels/second
ggiDrawLine:89335 lines/second
ggiDrawHLine: 308350 lines/second
ggiDrawVLine: 115966 lines/second
ggiDrawBox: 21009 boxes/second
ggiCopyBo
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Andreas Beck wrote:
> Not bad. On (unaccelerated) XGGI on fbdev I get at 1024x768x24 (running
> on 1600x1200 - i.e. high VideoOut Memory bandwidth demands) on a PIII/800
Oops, sorry. I was running at 1024x768x16 (not 24). Should have indicated
this. I cannot set 24 or 32 m
Hi,
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Andreas Beck wrote:
> Andreas Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Rodolphe Ortalo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Here is the output up to now (K6-III 450MHz, G200 AGP):
> > > identified to mapper graphic-0.9.0-0
> > > 1024x768 (1024x768)
> Rodolphe And
Andreas Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rodolphe Ortalo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Here is the output up to now (K6-III 450MHz, G200 AGP):
> > identified to mapper graphic-0.9.0-0
> > 1024x768 (1024x768)
Rodolphe Andy(X) Andy(fbdev)
> > ggiDrawPixel: 333598103506 747
Rodolphe Ortalo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here is the output up to now (K6-III 450MHz, G200 AGP):
> identified to mapper graphic-0.9.0-0
> 1024x768 (1024x768)
> ggiDrawPixel: 333598 pixels/second
> ggiDrawLine: 61823 lines/second
> ggiDrawHLine: 210260 lines/second
> ggiDrawVLine: 90723 lines/
14 matches
Mail list logo
