On Mon, 23 Dec 2002, Brian S. Julin wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Dec 2002, Rodolphe Ortalo wrote:
> > 0) What should a KGI-accel-oriented developper do next? :-)
>
> I'd like to see the get/put issues worked out personally, and of
> course, whatever can be done to bring the accelerator command queues
>
On Mon, 23 Dec 2002, Aurelien Reynaud wrote:
>
> Hi, I am a longtime lurker on the GGI mailing list...
>
> I'm not so good at programming and do not have much time either, but I'd be
> glad to help. So I can answer yes to your question: I have an old Mystique
> lying around. Maybe I can make so
On Mon, 23 Dec 2002, Rodolphe Ortalo wrote:
> 0) What should a KGI-accel-oriented developper do next? :-)
I'd like to see the get/put issues worked out personally, and of
course, whatever can be done to bring the accelerator command queues
up to max speed (by using optimal data transfer modes) d
Hi, I am a longtime lurker on the GGI mailing list...
I'm not so good at programming and do not have much time either, but I'd be
glad to help. So I can answer yes to your question: I have an old Mystique
lying around. Maybe I can make some testing/validating for you?
> 4) Do you have a {Mysti
Hello,
I've just committed a new default/kgi/Matrox/ directory with some *.c in
it. The kgi-Gx00 sublib now provides acceleration for some of libggi
drawing functions (drawbox, line, hline, vline, putc). It should also
accelerate copybox (but I am not totally sure that the implementation is
correc
