You are not being dense - unused code does nothing but take up disc
space.
On 01/21/06 19:34:02, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 04:48:24AM +, b.n. wrote
> Ehm. Perhaps it's me being dense but: who cares about unused code?
Ok,
> you have unnecessary, unused code sitting on your
he program.
On 01/22/06 03:47:12, Kristian Poul Herkild wrote:
Paul S. Bains wrote:
You are not being dense - unused code does nothing but take up disc
space.
Well, the code _can_ be loaded, without being executed, and therefore
taking up RAM.
-Kristian Poul Herkild
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.o
1/22/06 03:55:00, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Paul S. Bains wrote:
> You are not being dense - unused code does nothing but take up disc
> space.
That's not correct. It offers the potential of being
executed and thus, it offers the potential of being
a security threat. Thus it is better
I forgot interpreted code - maybe that's what the original poster
meant. I am used to only working with compiled binaries only.
On 01/22/06 08:47:38, Paul S. Bains wrote:
Perhaps I misunderstood the poster - unused, uncompiled code cannot
be loaded into RAM, unless you editing it. U
4 matches
Mail list logo
