On 7/15/06, Michael [Plouj] Ploujnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There must be a good reason it isn't stable yet:
http://www.gentoo-portage.com/net-print/cups
On 7/15/06, Kevin O'Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been running cups happily on this box for
es here is that the actual printer is a LaserJet 4m, with
builtin postscript (Level 1, not much memory) so I might well be able
to dispense with
ghostscript if the pages weren't too complex.
Another, of course is the PhD in my signature, given the bonehead
moves I've made
in the last week or so.
On 7/17/06, Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Monday 17 July 2006 03:31, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> D [16/Jul/2006:19:23:15 -0700] check_quotas: requesting-user-name = 'root'
> D [16/Jul/2006:19:23:15 -0700] print_job: requesting-user-name = 'root'
Do you
On 7/17/06, Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Monday 17 July 2006 03:31, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> D [16/Jul/2006:19:23:15 -0700] check_quotas: requesting-user-name = 'root'
> D [16/Jul/2006:19:23:15 -0700] print_job: requesting-user-name = 'root'
Do you
to upgrade this any more than what I just did by emerging it.
Anybody know what it's talking about? Anybody even know what toolchain-funcs
it's talking about -- my browse through the portage tree comes up with
no obvious
candidate.
++ kevin
--
Kevin O'Gorman, PhD
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
A message from emerging the latest transfig reads:
Please upgrade your package (transfig-3.2.4-r1) to use
toolchain-funcs.eclass
Why would it say that (rather than just doing it)? How would I comply
(I truly have
no clue)?
--
Kevin O'Gorman, PhD
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On 8/9/06, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 08:37:05 -0700, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> A message from emerging the latest transfig reads:
> Please upgrade your package (transfig-3.2.4-r1) to use
> toolchain-funcs.eclass
It's a QA me
On 7/22/06, Ryan Tandy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
>> WARN: prerm
>> Please upgrade your package (libmpeg3-1.5.2) to use
>> toolchain-funcs.eclass
>
Needs to be fixed by the maintainer of the ebuild. If you feel like it,
file a bug (che
On 8/14/06, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 19:35:59 -0700, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> > It's a QA message from portage to the developer of the ebuild, ignore
> > it.
> Isn't there some way "they" could flag such messages
On 8/13/06, Hemmann, Volker Armin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Monday 14 August 2006 04:39, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
>
> This was not the first time. It wasn't the last either -- I'm looking at a
> new fresh crop. Am I then to understand that none of these mess
On 8/15/06, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 22:51:00 -0700, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> > Removing strict from FEATURES should stop you seeing these AFAIR.
>
> I doubt it. All it contains right now is 'buildpkg'.
Are you sure? What doe
he host does not know to send reply packets to the
gateway.
It appears that I need to have a gateway (so my /etc/conf.d/net needs to
do that) and it may need to have the "H" flag off.
Can anyone else who uses a static IP setup take a look and see what
I'm doing differently?
++ kevin
--
Kevin O'Gorman, PhD
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On 8/16/06, Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kevin O'Gorman schrieb:
> config_eth1=( "64.166.164.49/29 brd 64.166.164.55" )
> gateway=( "eth1/64.166.164.54" )
What's gateway supposed to do? In my net.example, there's no gateway=().
Is
l hiding places. However, I can't get whereis
or anything else to tell me where it found them. Is there some
neat way to find the locations? I'd like to figure out which ones
correspond to my actual software and to ditch the others.
--
Kevin O'Gorman, PhD
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
kevin
--
Kevin O'Gorman, PhD
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
files for things I never
even knew I had, let alone how they were configured)
--
Kevin O'Gorman, PhD
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
t I'd like to not be
complicit in spam.
++ kevin
--
Kevin O'Gorman, PhD
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
ll of KDE
too (presumably by making them all ~x86)? Something else?
Summary:
- how do I make an ATI driver
- how do I make a speedo driver
- how to get KDE working
--
Kevin O'Gorman, PhD
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
adjust the order of scripts so that apache starts after vmware?
--
Kevin O'Gorman, PhD
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On 9/16/06, Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Saturday 16 September 2006 17:36, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> I'm trying to follow the HOWTO, but I've got a problem with ATI.
> I put 'ati' in VIDEO_CARDS in /etc/make.conf, but it was not picked
> up in the ac
the fact that a great many of them are KDE things, but
KDE seems to be working just fine.
What's a guy to do? Can I get away with just waiting for a while?
++ kevin
--
Kevin O'Gorman, PhD
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
the same
result as Mick.
As I have static IP's and a single domain I see no point in
per-interface domains, but
if I used them, what in the world could I expect domainname(1) to tell me?
It seems to me the most common setups are DHCP or something like mine, and I
would hope the documentation was clear for those common cases.
--
Kevin O'Gorman, PhD
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On 9/17/06, Bo Ørsted Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Saturday 16 September 2006 18:52, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> That's good to head. I can't get the ATI module compiled in. I thought I
> was doing the right thing following the howto when I put this in
> /etc/
On 9/17/06, Greg Bur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/17/06, Kevin O'Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just switched to modular X, and got to the point where the system
> comes up okay.
> I have a few remaining puzzles and problems. Here's one:
>
> When
On 9/17/06, Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sunday 17 September 2006 15:53, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> On 9/17/06, Bo Ørsted Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Saturday 16 September 2006 18:52, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> > > That's good to he
On 9/17/06, Ryan Tandy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> I was under the impression my video card was too old for the binary driver.
> It's built into the motherboard but reports as
>ATI Technologies Inc Rage XL rev 39
> does anybody k
there's a Linux
product that works reasonably well with CSS style sheets. Anybody
know of one. Free is good, cheap is acceptable.
++ kevin
--
Kevin O'Gorman, PhD
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
hat was sensible. I only vaguely understand that
LDAP has to do with "directory" searches, but I don't know why I should care
about that in general, or about it in reference to apache.
So what do I need to know about this?
++ kevin
--
Kevin O'Gorman, PhD
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
l about all the hundreds (thousands?) of
packages I have installed. I'd like them to be a bit more helpful, and perhaps
careful to state what the problem actually is, or might be. Courteous wouldn't
be a bad idea either.
++ kevin
--
Kevin O'Gorman, PhD
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
601 - 629 of 629 matches
Mail list logo
