I still can figure out how to configure my default route with the new
configuration format (as stupid as that may sound).
I have this:
config_eth0=( "192.168.1.5/24" )
which works and:
route_eth0="default gw 192.168.1.101"
which doesn't work. I tried:
route_eth0=("default via 192.168.1.101")
and
r
had very bad experience with bigfoots, about 50% (of 10 or more) died on the
first 2.5 years.
--
José Pablo Ezequiel Fernández
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
nednossp
Any idea how to solve this and other things I could do to clean up a bit the
system (did revdep-rebuild already, everything is ok).
Thanks.
--
José Pablo Ezequiel Fernández
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Thursday 25 August 2005 16:26, José Pablo Ezequiel Fernández wrote:
> fix_libtool_files.sh `gcc -dumpversion` --oldarch i386-pc-linux-gnu-gcc
fix_libtool_files.sh 3.3.5-20050130 --oldarch i386-pc-linux-gnu
fixed it, where "3.3.5-2005013" is the result of `gcc -dumpversion`, *si
ystem, if nobody takes care to maintain it secure, will eventually be
insecure.
--
José Pablo Ezequiel Fernández
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
pie
[4] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.3.5-20050130-hardenednopiessp
[5] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.3.5-20050130-hardenednossp
Any idea how to solve this and other things I could do to clean up a bit the
system (did revdep-rebuild already, everything is ok).
Thanks.
--
José Pablo Ezequiel Fernández
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
s ?
On Friday 26 August 2005 14:33, José Pablo Ezequiel Fernández wrote:
> Note: I though I had solved this previously, but I was mistaken, I still
> have the problem.
>
> I am upgrading my system from a GRP install and it has been a mess, I have
> solved various errors and now I h
g.d/net ?
That line is for running on the command line as root, for /etc/conf.d/net, a
similar one would have the same efect (check the file, it has comments about
it).
--
José Pablo Ezequiel Fernández
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Thursday 01 September 2005 18:53, Nick Smith wrote:
> I cant seem to find networkmanager anywhere in portage
What is networkmanager ? url ?
--
José Pablo Ezequiel Fernández
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 12:21, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> no, but I noticed, that reiserfs needs much less space with small files
> (like portage tree) than ext2/3.
Any numbers you can post ?
--
José Pablo Ezequiel Fernández
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
10 matches
Mail list logo
