on anybody can provide, since it
doesn't look like mDNSResponder is going to be fixed anytime soon I guess
the preferred method is to remove whatever USE flag(s) are bringing it in if
that's possible, but I don't know how to determine that information and
would be grateful for some as
uot; and, if it is one of those,
how do I determine which one, and then how do I fix this...?
Thanks for listening,
Bob Young
San Jose, CA
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
> -Original Message-
> From: Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2008 12:18 AM
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild command doesn't fix broken libs
> it finds
> Bob Young wrote:
>> How do
install developed severe hard disk corruption. Because of that, this install
is located on a brand new 250G Seagate with a five year warranty, so while
not impossible, I tend to doubt that the hard disk it self is the true root
cause.
Okay, so my question is how bad is it?
Is there an
-Original Message-
From: Volker Armin Hemmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 8:22 AM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Cc: Bob Young
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] How Bad Is This...?
>On Mittwoch, 16. April 2008, Bob Young wrote:
>> I'm in
: whoami
Cyor
[ 09:33:06 ] Thu May 01 /usr/bin $ : ./dumpcap
bash: ./dumpcap: Permission denied
[ 09:33:10 ] Thu May 01 /usr/bin $ :
I'm sure it's probably something simple that I'm unaware of or not seeing
for some reason. Can anybody point out what I'm doing wrong.
Th
-Original Message-
>From: Bob Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 10:03 AM
>To: Gentoo-user List
>Subject: [gentoo-user] Wireshark won't run except as root
> I've emerged wireshark, and made myself a member of both the wireshark
>
):
key_buffer_len = 1
parse_kbinput():
kbinput = 115,
meta_key = FALSE,
func_key = FALSE,
escapes = 0,
byte_digits = 0,
retval = 115
get_shortcut():
kbinput = 115,
meta_key = FALSE,
func_key = FALSE
matched nothing btw meta was 0
sget_key_buffer():
key_buffer_len = 1
parse_kbinput():
kbinput = 116,
meta_key = FALSE,
func_key = FALSE,
escapes = 0,
byte_digits = 0,
retval = 116
get_shortcut():
kbinput = 116,
meta_key = FALSE,
func_key = FALSE
matched nothing btw meta was 0
t
Can anybody explain what's going on here, and tell me how I can fix it?
BTW, if I edit with vi.everything works fine, and of course typing at the
console works okay as well.
Thanks for listening,
Bob Young
-Original Message-
From: Francesco Talamona [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 10:46 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Multiple error messages for each keystroke in
nano
On Saturday 17 May 2008, Bob Young wrote:
> Can anybody expl
-Original Message-
From: Ian Hilt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 11:03 PM
To: Gentoo-user List
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Multiple error messages for each keystroke in
nano
>> On Fri, 16 May 2008 at 7:07pm -0700, Bob Young wrote:
>> I'm instal
>-Original Message-
>From: Alex Schuster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2008 2:20 AM
>To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
>Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Multiple error messages for each keystroke in
>nano
>
>Bob Young writes:
>
>> Curre
o, I managed to stop a customer from buying
>several hundreds of NV cards - yes, consulting jobs sometimes
>make really fun this way ;-P)
Maybe that was the correct decision, maybe not, depends on the
circumstances. Regardless, your clients are not well served by your
uninformed bias.
--
Regards,
Bob Young
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
ild N] media-fonts/gnu-gs-fonts-std-8.11 3,665 kB
.
.
.
[ebuild N ] kde-base/karm-3.5.5 USE="-arts -debug -kdeenablefinal
-xinerama" 0 kB
[ebuild N] kde-base/kdeaddons-meta-3.5.5 USE="-arts" 0 kB
[ebuild N] kde-base/kontact-specialdates-3.5.5 USE="-arts -debug
-kdeenablefinal -xinerama" 0 kB
[ebuild N] kde-base/kdepim-meta-3.5.5 USE="-pda" 0 kB
[ebuild N] kde-base/kde-meta-3.5.5 USE="nls -accessibility" 0 kB
Total: 288 packages (288 new), Size of downloads: 473,412 kB
**
Am I doing something wrong?
Is this a known issue?
Is there an alternative other than disabling the doc USE flag?
TIA
Bob Young
San Jose, CA
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
scenario described above, assume the windows domain is
named "mydomain.lan," can I have 69.12.134.79 (NIC #2) resolve to
ns.debug1.com as that is it's publicly registered name, while IP address
10.10.32.1 (NIC #1) resolves to gentoo.mydomain.lan?
TIA
Bob Young
San Jose, CA.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
en's comment about named "views" and it looks like that may be
something to investigate.
Any further comments/suggestions welcome.
Thanks,
Bob Young
San Jose, CA
-Original Message-
From: Michal 'vorner' Vaner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2007 2:17
/or advice greatly
appreciated, and if I'm just doing something stupid, let me know.
TIA
Bob Young
San Jose, CA
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
r the dhcp server's lease duration is badly
misconfigured, or dhcpcd is not interpreting the data it receives from the
dhcp server correctly wrt lease duration.
Regards,
Bob Young
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
at s/he is doing that's allowing malicious code to execute on
their system and stop doing it. In the vast majority of Windows cases,
simply *not* routinely logging on with admin privileges would probably stop
99% plus of the infections.
Regards,
Bob Young
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
etter to run a single App with
Admin privledges rather than have all apps including email and browsers
running with Admin rights.
Regards,
Bob Young
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
-Original Message-
From: Jarry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 1:04 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] antivirus
Bob Young wrote:
> In the vast majority of Windows cases, simply *not* routinely logging on
> with admin priv
-Original Message-
From: Jarry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 8:50 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] antivirus
Bob Young wrote:
> PowerUser is different from Admin, Admin is the equevelent of root in the
> Linux/Unix
cons of a particular feature's implementation, and judge it objectively. I
don't always come down in favor of Windows, or Linux, it just depends on the
particular functionality being discussed.
Regards,
Bob Young
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Kintzios [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 9:12 AM
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: RE: [gentoo-user] antivirus
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Bob Young [mailto:[EMAIL
willing to adopt the few simple practices that would keep them
safe, AntiVirus software may have some value. However, for anyone willing to
adhere to a few basic rules, AV software is mostly the modern day equevelent
of Snake Oil, it's a waste of money and CPU cycles.
Regards
Bob Young
to ask for further information if there is
something I've left out that would be relevant or helpful.
Thanks for any Help
Bob Young
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
be just the compiler that was hung, as a ctrl-c would return me to
the command prompt. Forcing “nosmp” and “noapic” on the boot command line of
the install CD resolved that hang. Unfortunately that was after trying a *lot* of other things and command line
options.
Regards,
Bob Young
ed it,
or if they were both needed. May not help you, but thought I'd mention it
just in case.
Regards,
Bob Young
-Original Message-
From: bruce harding [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 3:13 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user
/portage/package.keywords
Assuming your running x86 of course, otherwise replace "~x86" with the
appropiate value for your arch.
HTH,
Bob Young
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
-Original Message-
From: Qian Qiao [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 11:53 AM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] failed to load nvidia kernel module
On 10/27/05, Bob Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm ran into the exac
-Original Message-
From: Qian Qiao [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 1:07 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] failed to load nvidia kernel module
On 10/27/05, Bob Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Now that you mention
;s responsible for creating the necessary nodes, why do the
unstable/masked versions of nvidia-kernel work correctly under a 2.6.13 kernel
without any "helper" scripts?
Regards,
Bob Young
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
ernel 6626-r4 runs fine.
Seems it is:
Thread from another user who experienced the problem:
http://www.usenetlinux.com/archive/topic.php/t-495527.html
The bug on it posted in Gentoo bugzilla:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104369
Regards,
Bob Young
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
.14 but there was an issue with 2.6.13 and
the nvidia drivers:
Thread from another user who experienced problems.
http://www.usenetlinux.com/archive/topic.php/t-495527.html
The bug on it posted b.g.o:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104369
May not be your problem, but maybe worth investigating.
--
Bob Young
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
If you want support for different video modes and boot splash etc,
use the vesafb, then your nvidia driver should load.
Bob Young
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
a stage1 install, and I've done this ( one time ) on the
install I just completed. Can sombody explain why it's necessary/desirable
to do this *twice*?
What real difference does the second execution really make?
Thanks,
Bob Young
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
_mutexattr_setrobust_np in -lc... yes (<- From
configure)
Comment: Okay...It's available in "-lc" what does that mean? and if it's
available why is it causing a build error?
Comment: What does "-lc" mean? Would declaring
pthread_mutexattr_setrobust_np as "external" on the condition of some define
solve the problem?
Again sorry for the long post, TIA to anyone who can share some insight.
Regards,
Bob Young
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
gt;
> Not an nptl issue, looks like a bug in the configure to me.
>
> The configure is finding that glibc has the
> pthread_mutexattr_setrobust_np function, so in threads.c it is
> activating this piece of code:
Thanks for the detailed explaination and the solution, much appreciate
t; confcache bug seem to indicate that the
"error" is in an ebuild previous to the one that failed. If I had
not deleted /var/tmp/confcache/config.cache I'd have sent in the
requested information to help resolve this bug. I can't tell from the
comments whether or not it'
re the definitive solution. For those who don't
want to spend many extra hours of compile time, in order to gain a 0.5%
increase in performance, the above is offered for consideration.
Regards,
Bob Young
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Behalf Of Richard Fish
> Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 9:24 PM
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] gcc-4.1.1
>
>
> On 6/7/06, Bob Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
;t actually exist yet. Can you clearly and concisely explain to me how
something that is in the process of being emerged can be used to emerge
itself? Doesn't make sense.
Regards,
Bob Young
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
> -Original Message-
> From: Bo Ørsted Andresen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 7:29 AM
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] gcc-4.1.1
>
>
> Thursday 08 June 2006 16:00 skrev Bob Young:
> > Show me some d
This is how Evolution displays if I log in under KDE or Gnome:
http://www.debug1.com/
Why the difference, and how can I get it to display correctly under KDE?
TIA
Bob Young
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
> -Original Message-
> From: Jerry McBride [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 7:10 PM
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] gcc-4.1.1
>
>
> On Wednesday 07 June 2006 21:50, Bob Young wrote:
> Note that the
>
***
> -Original Message-
> From: Bo Ørsted Andresen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 7:29 AM
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] gcc-4.1.1
>
>
> Thursday 08 June 2006 16:00 skrev Bob Young:
> > Show me some d
-Original Message-
From: Colleen Beamer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 4:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Why you use Gentoo
Chris White wrote:
> So, wondering why people use Gentoo. Put [dev] or something
46 matches
Mail list logo
