-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthias Fechner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I miss the tool cpio on the install CD. Where ca I submit that feature
> request?
>
> I would really appriciate it to have cpio on the install cd.
>
> Thx a lot
> Matthias
>
I'd suggest reading, start here:
http://
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Harm Geerts wrote:
> On Friday 12 January 2007 01:34, David Corbin wrote:
>> For some unknown reason, CTRL-ALT-NUM+ has stopped working for me. I'm
>> reasonably sure it happened when I switch from KDE-monolithic to the
>> individual KDE packages, odd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Justin Findlay wrote:
> On AD 2007 January 12 Friday 02:05:22 AM +0000, Avaricen wrote:
>> Have you attempted using CTRL-ALT-NUM+ on another desktop env?
>
> Even TWM should work in case you don't want to emerge anything.
&
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Corbin wrote:
> On Thursday 11 January 2007 21:05, Avaricen wrote:
>> Harm Geerts wrote:
>>> On Friday 12 January 2007 01:34, David Corbin wrote:
>>>> For some unknown reason, CTRL-ALT-NUM+ has stopped working for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Corbin wrote:
> Success, but I can't explain it all.
>
> First, I removed 'Option "XkbVariant" "nodeadkeys" ' from xorg.conf.
> That got the VT working and the Zooming. But ALT-TAB wasn't working at all.
> Now, earlier I had problems
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The full listing can be found here:
http://gentoo.pastebin.ca/314398
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFFp+nVhd3kS+HiI0sRAt8hAJ44td0J13R3NZwMt7kWr/w6VN0
our advice to be highly
important. It would be beneficial to everyone if we knew the
dependencies before emerging from portage.I highly suggest sending a
message on gentoo-dev@gentoo.org (confirm this). I really do support this.
Best regards.
Avaricen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Ve
s I know Apache uses the
following by default: USE="ldap ssl -apache2 -debug -doc -mpm-itk
-mpm-leader -mpm-peruser -mpm-prefork -mpm-threadpool -mpm-worker
(-selinux) -static-modules -threads". Select which you'd prefer. If only
you cared to study a little.
Best regards.
Avaricen
--
Fredrik Tolf wrote:
Hi List!
I was wondering -- is there a way to find out which of the licenses
in /usr/portage/licenses can be considered free software licenses
(without having to read and understand them)?
I'm trying to find out what packages I have installed that cannot be
considered free,
sist your query.
Best regards
Avaricen
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
On Wednesday 17 January 2007 19:58, Avaricen wrote:
As far as I know Apache uses the
following by default: USE="ldap ssl -apache2 -debug -doc -mpm-itk
-mpm-leader -mpm-peruser -mpm-prefork -mpm-threadpool -mpm-worker
(-selinux) -static-modules -threads".
Th
ki. Do a
search for it on Google. Hope this helps.
Best Regards.
Avaricen
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Luke Ravitch wrote:
On 2007-01-19 09:45, Vlad Dogaru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am especially looking for a browser to substitute Firefox (it's great, but
quite a memory hog). I like links, what with its graphical capabilities, but
it lacks tabs and that's a major downside in my vision. I'v
Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
On Saturday 20 January 2007 19:32, Avaricen wrote:
You mean Konqueror.
No. See
http://conkeror.mozdev.org
:O I thought you were referring to the KDE app. ;) My apologies.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
On Saturday 20 January 2007 19:32, Avaricen wrote:
Of course, Conkeror is still Firefox underneath, so that won't help
with it being a memory hog.
You mean Konqueror.
Err.. obviously not. Konqueror isn't based on Firefox...
http://conkeror.
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
On Thursday 18 January 2007 22:13, Avaricen wrote:
The defaults are entirely dependent on your choice of profile. apache2 is
enabled for server profiles. What you for some weird reason have listed
seem to match the desktop profiles...
I see. Note that the
Markus Schönhaber wrote:
Mick wrote:
Just upgraded to the latest dbus- and as I ran revdep-rebuild afterwards
this horrible failure occurred:
[...]
!!! ERROR: sys-apps/pmount-0.9.9 failed.
[...]
Any ideas?
Update pmount to 0.9.13. On x86 it's stable already.
BTW:
Markus Schönhaber wrote:
Mick wrote:
Just upgraded to the latest dbus- and as I ran revdep-rebuild afterwards
this horrible failure occurred:
[...]
!!! ERROR: sys-apps/pmount-0.9.9 failed.
[...]
Any ideas?
Update pmount to 0.9.13. On x86 it's stable already.
BTW:
18 matches
Mail list logo
