Hi,
as far as I understand updating @system first should be safer and easier
to perform than updating @world directly. It was mention that especially
after updating the software after a somewhat long period this might
solve conflicts. I often do experience different and wonder what the
reason
On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 10:43:30 +0100, hitachi303 wrote:
> as far as I understand updating @system first should be safer and
> easier to perform than updating @world directly. It was mention that
> especially after updating the software after a somewhat long period
> this might solve conflicts. I oft
Am 21.03.22 um 13:34 schrieb Neil Bothwick:
On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 10:43:30 +0100, hitachi303 wrote:
as far as I understand updating @system first should be safer and
easier to perform than updating @world directly. It was mention that
especially after updating the software after a somewhat long
>>
>>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Rich Freeman
>>Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2022 11:03 AM
>>To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
>>Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] KDE, sddm etc security. Plus LVM question.
>>
>>On Sun, Mar 20, 2022 at 12:05 PM Daniel Frey wrote:
>>>
>>> They don't even need to defe
I've moved my local portage distfiles server to a new installation, with no
changes in the configuration. I expected www-servers/boa to start, but for
reasons I fail to understand it won't do so:
~ # rc-service -v boa start
* Caching service dependencies ...
On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 15:41:14 +0100, hitachi303 wrote:
> >> as far as I understand updating @system first should be safer and
> >> easier to perform than updating @world directly. It was mention that
> >> especially after updating the software after a somewhat long period
> >> this might solve conf
On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 12:17 PM Laurence Perkins wrote:
>
> There was the ORWL project a few years ago. Self-encrypting SSD drive with a
> TPM that would unlock it only in the presence of an encrypted RFID tag plus
> tapping in a code on the keypad, with all the sensitive bits wrapped in an
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Rich Freeman
>Sent: Monday, March 21, 2022 11:07 AM
>To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
>Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] KDE, sddm etc security. Plus LVM question.
>
>On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 12:17 PM Laurence Perkins wrote:
>>
>> There was the ORWL project a few years
On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 2:30 PM Laurence Perkins wrote:
>
> Having it remain unlocked and capable of rebooting unless the accelerometer
> showed movement I think was an option since the TPM kept monitoring even if
> the mains power was interrupted.
>
Yeah, there might still be ways to accomplis
>-Original Message-
>From: Rich Freeman
>Sent: Monday, March 21, 2022 1:08 PM
>To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
>Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] KDE, sddm etc security. Plus LVM question.
>
>On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 2:30 PM Laurence Perkins wrote:
>>
>> Having it remain unlocked and capable of
On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 8:03 PM Laurence Perkins wrote:
>
> The TPM in most computers doesn't dump the keys if someone tries to open the
> case to install hardware sniffers.
>
That's a good point, though if somebody with the ability to sniff the
RAM or (to a lesser degree) GPU traffic is after y
11 matches
Mail list logo
