Hi,
media-video/handbrake-1.3.2:0/0::gentoo fails to compile (I am on
"unstable").
Searching online I found, that running perl-cleaner would fix that
problem which I done:
perl-cleaner --all
- but without success.
Message was:
* ERROR: media-video/handbrake-1.3.2::gentoo failed (compile pha
On Sun, 24 May 2020 12:44:20 +0200, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> media-video/handbrake-1.3.2:0/0::gentoo fails to compile (I am on
> "unstable").
>
> Searching online I found, that running perl-cleaner would fix that
> problem which I done:
>
> perl-cleaner --all
>
> - but without success.
>
> Me
Hi,
On Sun 24 May 2020 12:44:20 GMT, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> Message was:
>
> * ERROR: media-video/handbrake-1.3.2::gentoo failed (compile phase):
> * emake failed
No, the error is here:
> /usr/bin/g++ -pipe -Wl,-S -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed -fmessage-length=0 -Wall
> -Wno-format-truncation
tu...@posteo.de writes:
media-video/handbrake-1.3.2:0/0::gentoo fails to compile (I am
on
"unstable").
Message was:
* ERROR: media-video/handbrake-1.3.2::gentoo failed (compile
phase):
* emake failed
Funny, when I `cat` the ebuild, it has a few TODO items.
And it says documentat
On 05/24 11:54, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 24 May 2020 12:44:20 +0200, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
>
> > media-video/handbrake-1.3.2:0/0::gentoo fails to compile (I am on
> > "unstable").
> >
> > Searching online I found, that running perl-cleaner would fix that
> > problem which I done:
> >
> >
On 05/24 11:12, R wrote:
>
> tu...@posteo.de writes:
>
> > media-video/handbrake-1.3.2:0/0::gentoo fails to compile (I am on
> > "unstable").
> >
>
> > Message was:
> >
> > * ERROR: media-video/handbrake-1.3.2::gentoo failed (compile phase):
> > * emake failed
>
> Funny, when I `cat` the
On Sun, 24 May 2020 13:15:37 +0200, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> A more general question: It is not the first time I searched for
> fixes for compilation failures I came accross and I never got a
> link into the gentoo bug tracker. As search terms I used
> "handbrake gentoo compile failure".
I foun
> -Original Message-
> From: tu...@posteo.de
> Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2020 7:16 PM
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] handbrake fails to compile
>
> On 05/24 11:54, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Sun, 24 May 2020 12:44:20 +0200, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> >
> > > me
On 05/24 08:10, Pengcheng Xu wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: tu...@posteo.de
> > Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2020 7:16 PM
> > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] handbrake fails to compile
> >
> > On 05/24 11:54, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > > On Sun, 24 May 2020
tu...@posteo.de writes:
On 05/24 11:12, R wrote:
`cat
/usr/portage/media-video/handbrake/handbrake-1.3.0-r2.ebuild`
Also, do you have media-video/handbrake-1.3.2-*r2* ?
then *r2 has been released secongs after my syincing...h...
o_O
My bad! I was too hasty and mis-typed.
It was actuall
On 5/24/20 8:33 AM, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
On 05/24 08:10, Pengcheng Xu wrote:
-Original Message-
From: tu...@posteo.de
Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2020 7:16 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] handbrake fails to compile
On 05/24 11:54, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun
On Sun, 24 May 2020 09:50:53 -0400, Jack wrote:
> > My question was:
> > "Is the bug tracker secureVud somehow against search machine robots
> > somehow or via robots.txt or is it me using a foreign language
> > wrongly?"
> In my opinion, neither. I don't think they are explicitly blocked, but
Hello,
On Sat, 23 May 2020, John Covici wrote:
>On Sat, 23 May 2020 11:39:40 -0400, David Haller wrote:
>> WD Red WD*EFRX are PMR.
>> WD Red WD*EFAX are SMR (AFAIK, could be, that some are PMR).
>>
>> ISTR, that the "Red Pro" are all PMR (so far).
>
>How about WD4001FFSX-68JNUN0? I hope its pmr.
Hi guys,
I've got this today:
$ sudo emerge --sync
>>> Syncing repository 'gentoo' into '/var/db/repos/gentoo'...
* Using keys from /usr/share/openpgp-keys/gentoo-release.asc
* Refreshing keys via WKD ... [ ok ]
Fetching most recent snapshot ...
T
David Haller wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, 22 May 2020, antlists wrote:
>> On 22/05/2020 19:23, Rich Freeman wrote:
>>> A big problem with drive-managed SMR is that it basically has to
>>> assume the OS is dumb, which means most writes are in-place with no
>>> trims, assuming the drive even supports
On 24/05/2020 20:15, Consus wrote:
I've got this today:
$ sudo emerge --sync
Checking signature ...
gpg: Signature made Sun 24 May 2020 03:56:07 MSK
gpg:using RSA key
E1D6ABB63BFCFB4BA02FDF1CEC590EEAC9189250
gpg: Good signature from "Gento
On Sunday, 24 May 2020 18:36:28 BST Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 24/05/2020 20:15, Consus wrote:
> > I've got this today:
> > $ sudo emerge --sync
> > Checking signature ...
> > gpg: Signature made Sun 24 May 2020 03:56:07 MSK
> > gpg:using RSA key
> > E1D6ABB63
On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 07:08:41PM +0100, Michael wrote:
> Check your /usr/share/openpgp-keys/gentoo-release.asc file. This is the hash
> I get here:
>
> $ sha512sum gentoo-release.asc
> 3b168b7e43ad2cf4f042be585abc761c5786f55c94592dc916d13a1ef5557f047e614a7d70827471ace113f16eceb4e455228c4a5f7b9
18 matches
Mail list logo
