Dear everybody,
I got my Gentoo system running compiled with openssl.
I'd like to rebuild my entire system based on libreSSL.
What best practices do you advise ?
Thanks.
best, Tamer
Tamer Higazi wrote:
> Dear everybody,
>
> I got my Gentoo system running compiled with openssl.
> I'd like to rebuild my entire system based on libreSSL.
>
> What best practices do you advise ?
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> best, Tamer
>
>
>
If all you're doing is changing a USE flag, emerge -Na world shou
On Friday, 17 April 2020 17:52:26 BST Dale wrote:
> Tamer Higazi wrote:
> > Dear everybody,
> >
> > I got my Gentoo system running compiled with openssl.
> > I'd like to rebuild my entire system based on libreSSL.
> >
> > What best practices do you advise ?
> >
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> > bes
> However, is there a good reason for opting for libressl instead of the
> ubiquitous openssl?
I haven't tried libressl yet, but the main reason I'm interested in trying it
is due to the fact it doesn't have a "bindist" USE flag. In fact some packages
require openssl to be built with the "-bind
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 1:50 PM Francesco Turco wrote:
>
> > However, is there a good reason for opting for libressl instead of the
> > ubiquitous openssl?
>
> I haven't tried libressl yet, but the main reason I'm interested in trying it
> is due to the fact it doesn't have a "bindist" USE flag.
The BIOS and lshw -c memory shows 2x8Gig but the OS (/proc/meminfo) only
shows 8Gig. I've re-seated the RAM, tried different slots, booted from CD,
but no change. Last time i looked the OS showed 16Gig.
Is there anything else i can try or is it new RAM time?
If the bios sees it, an lshw sees it it's not the ram, I seriously doubt new
ram would help. I've seen a failing power supply make ram look flaky before,
possibly the drive activity during booting is loading down the power supply
enough to confuse your' system. In any case, you should run memt
Hi,
on my system are installed (beside other things, of course... :)
[I] virtual/w3m
Available versions: 0
Installed versions: 0(03:51:00 AM 04/18/2020)
Description: Virtual for the w3m web browser
[I] www-client/w3m
Available versions: 0.5.3_p20180125 (~)0.5.3_p20
Setting up to do my monthly update . There was an update to
portage, so I ran it. The final stage (install) complained about a
missing (python?) module named "netlink". Is this a serious problem?
=
>>> Installing (1 of 1) sys-
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 10:25:14PM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
> Setting up to do my monthly update . There was an update to
> portage, so I ran it. The final stage (install) complained about a
> missing (python?) module named "netlink". Is this a serious problem?
I can't immediately see why por
10 matches
Mail list logo
