I re-installed gentoo from the minimal boot cd (amd64), re-emerged
everything from my old, saved world file, overnight, and its up and
running, more or less. Then, I wanted to see what was available and
discovered, there's no /usr/portage directory! What did I do wrong?
On Monday, 11 November 2019 08:25:06 GMT n952162 wrote:
> I re-installed gentoo from the minimal boot cd (amd64), re-emerged
> everything from my old, saved world file, overnight, and its up and
> running, more or less. Then, I wanted to see what was available and
> discovered, there's no /usr/por
On Monday, 11 November 2019 08:38:38 GMT you wrote:
> wishoo! ;-)
>
> Thank you.
You're welcome. :-) This page explains the new portage fs locations in more
detail:
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Handbook:AMD64/Portage/Files
--
Regards,
Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
On Monday, 11 November 2019 04:37:17 GMT Caveman Al Toraboran wrote:
> hi - is it possible to have some kind of fancy links that
> know the name of the process that is trying to access
> it, and based on its name, it links it to a file?
Yes, it's done all the time. Have a look at, e.g., /usr/bin/r
Le lun. 11 nov. 2019 à 09:35, Mick a écrit :
>
> On Monday, 11 November 2019 08:25:06 GMT n952162 wrote:
> > I re-installed gentoo from the minimal boot cd (amd64), re-emerged
> > everything from my old, saved world file, overnight, and its up and
> > running, more or less. Then, I wanted to see
On 09/11/19 19:51, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 9, 2019 at 7:01 AM J. Roeleveld wrote:
>>
>> On 9 November 2019 11:42:38 CET, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>>> On Fri, 08 Nov 2019 21:03:13 +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>>>
I had a similar issue and ended up checking every init-script, conf.d
f
On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 5:38 AM Wols Lists wrote:
>
> On 09/11/19 19:51, Rich Freeman wrote:
> >
> > Only if somebody has created a generator for openrc, which I doubt.
> > It was obviously a semi-trollish comment.
> >
> Now that's harsh! Although yes I'm sure he was tweaking tails - hence
> the "
On Mon, 11 Nov 2019 at 11:29, Mickaël Bucas wrote:
> My two systems are currently using the old locations.
> Is there a documentation about the way to migrate to the new locations
> without breaking things ?
> The profile links comes to mind but other things are probably necessary !
>
> Has anyone
On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 5:28 AM Mickaël Bucas wrote:
>
> My two systems are currently using the old locations.
> Is there a documentation about the way to migrate to the new locations
> without breaking things ?
> The profile links comes to mind but other things are probably necessary !
>
> Has an
On Monday, 11 November 2019 11:54:31 GMT Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 5:38 AM Wols Lists wrote:
>
> > Fact is, there are a lot of people out there who hate systemd because
> > it's been successful, and it's been successful because it sticks to the
> > nix philosophy of "do one thi
Mickaël Bucas wrote:
> Le lun. 11 nov. 2019 à 09:35, Mick a écrit :
>> On Monday, 11 November 2019 08:25:06 GMT n952162 wrote:
>>> I re-installed gentoo from the minimal boot cd (amd64), re-emerged
>>> everything from my old, saved world file, overnight, and its up and
>>> running, more or less.
On Monday, 11 November 2019 13:00:20 GMT Dale wrote:
> Mickaël Bucas wrote:
> > Le lun. 11 nov. 2019 à 09:35, Mick a écrit :
> >> On Monday, 11 November 2019 08:25:06 GMT n952162 wrote:
> >>> I re-installed gentoo from the minimal boot cd (amd64), re-emerged
> >>> everything from my old, saved wor
On Monday, 11 November 2019 12:02:43 GMT Rich Freeman wrote:
> I also keep a /usr/portage symlink because I must be getting old. :)
> Some tools also have that path hard-coded.
I wasn't aware of this - mine is just an empty directory with no symlink. I
haven't noticed any adverse effects so fa
On 11/11/19 11:54, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 5:38 AM Wols Lists wrote:
>>
>> On 09/11/19 19:51, Rich Freeman wrote:
>>>
>>> Only if somebody has created a generator for openrc, which I doubt.
>>> It was obviously a semi-trollish comment.
>>>
>> Now that's harsh! Although yes I'
Mick wrote:
> On Monday, 11 November 2019 13:00:20 GMT Dale wrote:
>> Mickaël Bucas wrote:
>>> Le lun. 11 nov. 2019 à 09:35, Mick a écrit :
On Monday, 11 November 2019 08:25:06 GMT n952162 wrote:
> I re-installed gentoo from the minimal boot cd (amd64), re-emerged
> everything from my
On Mon, Nov 11, 2019, at 14:00, Dale wrote:
> root@fireball / # cat /etc/make.conf | grep var
> PORT_LOGDIR=/var/log/portage/
> source /var/lib/layman/make.conf
> DISTDIR="/var/cache/portage/distfiles/"
> PKGDIR="/var/cache/portage/packages"
> PORTDIR="/var/cache/portage/tree"
I'm sure you already
On Monday, 11 November 2019 10:38:50 GMT Wols Lists wrote:
> Fact is, there are a lot of people out there who hate systemd because
> it's been successful, and it's been successful because it sticks to the
> nix philosophy of "do one thing, and do it well".
...but not the other *nix tradition of m
On Mon, 11 Nov 2019 06:54:31 -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > > It was obviously a semi-trollish comment.
> > >
> > Now that's harsh! Although yes I'm sure he was tweaking tails - hence
> > the "tongue in cheek" smiley.
>
> I didn't intend to suggest that I thought it was mean-spirited. Just
>
On Mon, 11 Nov 2019 14:32:36 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > Fact is, there are a lot of people out there who hate systemd because
> > it's been successful, and it's been successful because it sticks to
> > the nix philosophy of "do one thing, and do it well".
>
> ...but not the other *nix tra
On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 04:37:17AM +, Caveman Al Toraboran wrote
> hi - is it possible to have some kind of fancy links that
> know the name of the process that is trying to access
> it, and based on its name, it links it to a file?
Short answer... YES! Now convince the developers to use it
Francesco Turco wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2019, at 14:00, Dale wrote:
>> root@fireball / # cat /etc/make.conf | grep var
>> PORT_LOGDIR=/var/log/portage/
>> source /var/lib/layman/make.conf
>> DISTDIR="/var/cache/portage/distfiles/"
>> PKGDIR="/var/cache/portage/packages"
>> PORTDIR="/var/cache/port
On 11/11/19 12:38 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 04:37:17AM +, Caveman Al Toraboran wrote
hi - is it possible to have some kind of fancy links that
know the name of the process that is trying to access
it, and based on its name, it links it to a file?
Short answer... YES!
22 matches
Mail list logo
