Re: [gentoo-user] Globally disabling colour

2019-10-02 Thread Dr Rainer Woitok
Hakon, On Tuesday, 2019-10-01 16:07:55 +0200, you wrote: > ... > I've got this in make.conf, which gets me part-way there: > > CMAKE_COLOR_MAKEFILE=OFF > NOCOLOR="true" > GCC_COLORS="" I already had the "NOCOLOR" environment variable set (there was a typo in my mail, not in my "make.conf" fil

Re: [gentoo-user] UEFI data corruption? [FIXED-FIXED]

2019-10-02 Thread Mick
On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 at 22:38, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > On Tuesday, 1 October 2019 18:47:25 BST Mick wrote: > > > As I understand it this ID must be the ID bootctl itself reports. > > However, earlier bootctl versions do not have this set-default ID > > subcommand. If you run bootctl with no argum

Re: [gentoo-user] Globally disabling colour

2019-10-02 Thread Håkon Alstadheim
Den 02.10.2019 11:01, skrev Dr Rainer Woitok: Hakon, On Tuesday, 2019-10-01 16:07:55 +0200, you wrote: ... I've got this in make.conf, which gets me part-way there: CMAKE_COLOR_MAKEFILE=OFF NOCOLOR="true" GCC_COLORS="" I already had the "NOCOLOR" environment variable set (there was a typo

Re: [gentoo-user] UEFI data corruption? [FIXED-FIXED]

2019-10-02 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Wednesday, 2 October 2019 10:04:33 BST Mick wrote: > On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 at 22:38, Peter Humphrey wrote: > OK, 'bootctl --help' and 'man bootctl' ought to show if the installed > version comes with the full list of options or not. Neither of them says what should happen if an option is not sup