On 17/05/19 06:19, Andrew Udvare wrote:
>> On May 17, 2019, at 01:14, Adam Carter wrote:
>>
>> The classic one is where OPS haven't noticed that disks in a RAID array have
>> died years ago...
>
> This really happened?
>
It's probably more common than you think.
Can't tell (don't really know)
Hello list,
I use this box as a compile host for two other boxes on the LAN. From each of
those I NFS-export $PORTDIR to a chroot jail on this box, run portage etc. in
the jail as needed and then install the binaries on the smaller boxes.
Recently there've been several mentions of containers in
On Saturday, 18 May 2019 02:25:58 BST Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> At some point in the future, my stationary PC will require a hardware
> refresh. At that point I will say goodbye to Intel. This is the only
> language companies understand.
Yes, Intel has been permanently erased as an option for
On 5/18/19 9:26 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
Hello list,
Hi,
Can anyone answer this?
I can't comment on LXC or containers in general, but I will say that I
think that namespaces (which is largely what I think containers are)
could do this.
I'd suggest a mount, UTS, and possibly user namesp
On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 12:44 PM Grant Taylor
wrote:
>
> On 5/18/19 9:26 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > Hello list,
>
> Hi,
>
> > Can anyone answer this?
>
> I would think that containers could be made to do this. But I'm not a
> fan of the containerization systems that I've seen. They seem to be
On Saturday, May 18, 2019 11:01:30 P.M. AEST Wols Lists wrote:
> On 17/05/19 06:19, Andrew Udvare wrote:
> >> On May 17, 2019, at 01:14, Adam Carter wrote:
> >>
> >> The classic one is where OPS haven't noticed that disks in a RAID array
> >> have died years ago...>
> > This really happened?
>
On 19/05/19 00:49, Rich Freeman wrote:
> I believe the reason the wiki says to be careful with mounts has more
> to do with UID/GID mapping. As you are using nfs this is already an
> issue you're probably dealing with. You're probably aware that
> running nfs with multiple hosts with unsynchroniz
On 5/18/19 5:49 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
I'd be interested if there are other scripts people have put out
there, but I agree that most of the container solutions on Linux
are overly-complex.
Here's what I use for some networking, which probably qualifies as
extremely light weight ""containers.
On 5/18/19 7:04 PM, Wols Lists wrote:
Not that I do it (it would be a bit of a learning experience :-)
but this is where using ldap for user management would score ...
Centralized ID administration is nice. I've dabbled with the following:
· Manual UID & GID management
· Copying passwd/shad
9 matches
Mail list logo
