Hi,
I would like to set the alias of my interfaces at boot (if possible with
netifrc).
Here are the relevant parts of my configuration:
config_enp3s0f0="null"
vlans_enp3s0f0="20 21 22 50"
config_enp3s0f0_22="185.1.89.13/24 2001:7f8:b1::d/64"
My interface is well created, but if I want an alias,
Apparently they're going to try to pry grub-0.97 from my cold dead
fingers...
Is there any documentation on how to do a basic minimal grub:2
install?
I really don't want any of the auto-magical, devs know better than I
do what I want, os-probing, hide all the details from the stupid user,
config
On 2019-01-17, Grant Edwards wrote:
> Is there any documentation on how to do a basic minimal grub:2
> install?
>
> I really don't want any of the auto-magical, devs know better than I
> do what I want, os-probing, hide all the details from the stupid user,
> config file generator stuff installed
On 2019.01.17 17:52, Grant Edwards wrote:
Apparently they're going to try to pry grub-0.97 from my cold dead
fingers...
Is there any documentation on how to do a basic minimal grub:2
install?
I really don't want any of the auto-magical, devs know better than I
do what I want, os-probing, hide a
Grant Edwards wrote:
> Apparently they're going to try to pry grub-0.97 from my cold dead
> fingers...
>
> Is there any documentation on how to do a basic minimal grub:2
> install?
>
> I really don't want any of the auto-magical, devs know better than I
> do what I want, os-probing, hide all the de
On 2019-01-17, Dale wrote:
> I made the switch a good while back. Even for me, it has been fairly
> easy. I don't recall it ever breaking or giving me trouble. When I
> build a new kernel and get the init thingy in /boot, I run this command
> to update grub.
>
> grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/g
On 2019-01-17, Jack wrote:
> I just copied the ebuild (and required patches) into my local overlay.
> Still no grub2 for me in Gentoo.
I'll probably do that for now. As long as it keeps working, there's
no need to battle with grub2...
> (I do use it on other PCs with other distros, and the
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 6:15 PM Grant Edwards wrote:
>
> Do all the Gentoo package maintainers promise they'll never run
> grub-mkconfig as part of a any package (even grub:2) install, remove,
> or update?
>
I doubt you'd get it in writing but I'd be shocked if they ever did.
Gentoo doesn't insta
On 2019-01-17, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 6:15 PM Grant Edwards
> wrote:
>>
>> Do all the Gentoo package maintainers promise they'll never run
>> grub-mkconfig as part of a any package (even grub:2) install, remove,
>> or update?
>
> I doubt you'd get it in writing but I'd be
On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 18:51:20 -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
> Basically grub2 is a completely inert package. The stuff in /usr/bin
> and so on doesn't do anything unless you explicitly run it. The
> bootloader reads its config file and does what it says, just like the
> old one. The bootloader won'
On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 23:34:48 + (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote:
> I'm not worried about the size, I just don't want any of the
> automagical config stuff happening (and would feel safest if it wasn't
> even installed).
Add grub-mkconfig to INSTALL_MASK in make.conf.
Neil Bothwick
Don't let your
On 1/17/19 2:52 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
Apparently they're going to try to pry grub-0.97 from my cold dead
fingers...
Is there any documentation on how to do a basic minimal grub:2
install?
I really don't want any of the auto-magical, devs know better than I
do what I want, os-probing, hide al
On 2019-01-18, Daniel Frey wrote:
> On 1/17/19 2:52 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
>> Apparently they're going to try to pry grub-0.97 from my cold dead
>> fingers...
>>
>> Is there any documentation on how to do a basic minimal grub:2
>> install?
>>
>> I really don't want any of the auto-magical, dev
13 matches
Mail list logo
