On Thursday, 18 January 2018 18:45:41 GMT Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 18/01/18 20:33, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> > Do those External Storage work with Linux (USB3)?
> > I don't want to install any ventor-software, I just want one that plugs
> > and play.
> >
> > Any recommendations?
>
> My
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 12:26 AM, victor romanchuk wrote:
> local:jumbo-build:www-client/chromium: Combine source files to speed up
> build process.
>
> setting that significantly speeds up emerge time (tried it twice; the second
> attempt had the flag set)
>
> $ qlop -gHv -d `date +%Y-%m-%d` c
On 01/19/2018 02:30 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Thursday, 18 January 2018 18:45:41 GMT Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>> On 18/01/18 20:33, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>>> Do those External Storage work with Linux (USB3)?
>>> I don't want to install any ventor-software, I just want one that plugs
>>
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 8:49 AM, wrote:
> On 01/19/2018 02:30 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>> On Thursday, 18 January 2018 18:45:41 GMT Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>>> On 18/01/18 20:33, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
Do those External Storage work with Linux (USB3)?
I don't want to install an
On 18/01/18 21:22, mad.scientist.at.la...@tutanota.com wrote:
> if you're going with external drives use laptop drives, or build a JBOD
> with good cooling. in any case, monitor drive temperatures, in my
> experiance anything above 100F is asking for a short life, bellow or at
> 100F drives new a
On Friday, 19 January 2018 13:29:51 GMT Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 12:26 AM, victor romanchuk
wrote:
> > local:jumbo-build:www-client/chromium: Combine source files to speed up
> > build process.>
> > setting that significantly speeds up emerge time (tried it twice; the
> >
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 12:04 PM, Mick wrote:
>
> On my old i7 laptop it eats up all 4G of RAM and 4G of swap before it conks
> out. So, I dropped the jobs to 3 and --load-average to 2, added a swapfile to
> increase disk space and it now builds in around 13 hours.
>
> I have not used jumbo-build
I need to setup an SMTP relay server.
It needs to accept messages as an SMTP server (using SSL and AUTH on a
non-standard port) from a single user and single source and then relay
them by passing them to a command-line MTA (e.g. /usr/bin/sendmail
replacement provided by msmtp).
It only needs to h
On 19.01.18 19:03, Grant Edwards wrote:
> I need to setup an SMTP relay server.
>
> It needs to accept messages as an SMTP server (using SSL and AUTH on a
> non-standard port) from a single user and single source and then relay
> them by passing them to a command-line MTA (e.g. /usr/bin/sendmail
>
On 01/19/2018 11:03 AM, Grant Edwards wrote:
I need to setup an SMTP relay server.
Okay.
It needs to accept messages as an SMTP server (using SSL and AUTH on a
non-standard port) from a single user and single source and then relay
them by passing them to a command-line MTA (e.g. /usr/bin/sen
On 2018-01-19, Ralph Seichter wrote:
> On 19.01.18 19:03, Grant Edwards wrote:
>
>> I need to setup an SMTP relay server.
>>
>> It needs to accept messages as an SMTP server (using SSL and AUTH on a
>> non-standard port) from a single user and single source and then relay
>> them by passing them t
On 2018-01-19, Grant Taylor wrote:
> I haven't done enough with the above (alternate) MTAs to be able to
> speak to them. But my understanding is that they come with a
> /path/to/sendmail wrapper script (or binary) that emulates part of
> what the sendmail binary did. At least the portions ther
On 2018-01-19 18:03, Grant Edwards wrote:
> It needs to accept messages as an SMTP server (using SSL and AUTH on a
> non-standard port) from a single user and single source and then relay
> them by passing them to a command-line MTA (e.g. /usr/bin/sendmail
> replacement provided by msmtp).
Just l
On 01/19/2018 11:31 AM, Grant Edwards wrote:
I want to accept incoming email via SMTP (my computer is an SMTP server).
Okay.
So you don't need to accept mail via /usr/sbin/sendmail (et al).
Or rather, that's what you want email to leave the relay through.
I want to relay each of those messag
On 2018-01-19, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> On 2018-01-19 18:03, Grant Edwards wrote:
>
>> It needs to accept messages as an SMTP server (using SSL and AUTH on a
>> non-standard port) from a single user and single source and then relay
>> them by passing them to a command-line MTA (e.g. /usr/bin/sendmai
On 01/19/2018 11:38 AM, Grant Edwards wrote:
I have a /usr/bin/sendmail emulator that transfers mail to an MTA that
will then worry about delivery. I need an SMTP server that will relay
incoming mail by using that existing command-line utility.
…
I need something that accepts mail via SMTP (
On 2018-01-19, Grant Taylor wrote:
> So you don't need to accept mail via /usr/sbin/sendmail (et al).
Correct.
> Or rather, that's what you want email to leave the relay through.
Correct.
>> I want to relay each of those messages by invoking a command-line
>> utility that has the same "API" a
On 01/19/2018 11:59 AM, Grant Edwards wrote:
I meant the sematics and sytax of the command line options and the data
accepted on stdin and produced on stdout. I probably should have said
"usage" rather than API. Since I always use that utility from a Python
or Bash program, in my head that's
On 2018-01-19 18:49, Grant Edwards wrote:
> > Just like the others writing in this thread, I am wondering why you
> > need 2 pieces here. Why won't e.g. exim do both sides of this for
> > you? It certainly has all the functionality.
>
> I don't see how you can say that when you don't know the m
On 2018-01-19, Grant Taylor wrote:
> On 01/19/2018 11:38 AM, Grant Edwards wrote:
>
>> I have a /usr/bin/sendmail emulator that transfers mail to an MTA
>> that will then worry about delivery. I need an SMTP server that
>> will relay incoming mail by using that existing command-line
>> utility.
>
On 19/01/2018 21:43, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> On 2018-01-19 18:49, Grant Edwards wrote:
>
>>> Just like the others writing in this thread, I am wondering why you
>>> need 2 pieces here. Why won't e.g. exim do both sides of this for
>>> you? It certainly has all the functionality.
>>
>> I don't see
On 2018-01-19, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> On 2018-01-19 18:49, Grant Edwards wrote:
>
>> > Just like the others writing in this thread, I am wondering why you
>> > need 2 pieces here. Why won't e.g. exim do both sides of this for
>> > you? It certainly has all the functionality.
>>
>> I don't see h
On 19/01/2018 21:54, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2018-01-19, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
>> On 2018-01-19 18:49, Grant Edwards wrote:
>>
Just like the others writing in this thread, I am wondering why you
need 2 pieces here. Why won't e.g. exim do both sides of this for
you? It certainly h
On 2018-01-19, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 19/01/2018 21:43, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
>> On 2018-01-19 18:49, Grant Edwards wrote:
>>
Just like the others writing in this thread, I am wondering why you
need 2 pieces here. Why won't e.g. exim do both sides of this for
you? It certainly
On 01/19/2018 12:48 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
I'm also wondering why you need 2 bits. Earlier in the thread you
mentioned that you send perhaps a few messages a week and never more
than one connection at a time.
Grant E. has indicated elsewhere in the thread that his
/usr/bin/sendmail script i
On 2018-01-19, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 19/01/2018 21:54, Grant Edwards wrote:
>> On 2018-01-19, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
>>> On 2018-01-19 18:49, Grant Edwards wrote:
>>>
> Just like the others writing in this thread, I am wondering why you
> need 2 pieces here. Why won't e.g. exim do both
On 19/01/2018 22:01, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2018-01-19, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> On 19/01/2018 21:43, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
>>> On 2018-01-19 18:49, Grant Edwards wrote:
>>>
> Just like the others writing in this thread, I am wondering why you
> need 2 pieces here. Why won't e.g. exim do
On 19/01/2018 22:03, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2018-01-19, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> On 19/01/2018 21:54, Grant Edwards wrote:
>>> On 2018-01-19, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
On 2018-01-19 18:49, Grant Edwards wrote:
>> Just like the others writing in this thread, I am wondering why you
>
On 01/19/2018 12:48 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
Yep, and it looks like the Postfix equivalent is a custom pipe transport.
Once you know what phrases to google for, it's a lot easier.
*nod*
I figured that you would be able to find something.
Hence why I mentioned the terms. ;-)
I could live wit
On 2018-01-19, Grant Taylor wrote:
> On 01/19/2018 12:48 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> I'm also wondering why you need 2 bits. Earlier in the thread you
>> mentioned that you send perhaps a few messages a week and never more
>> than one connection at a time.
>
> Grant E. has indicated elsewhere in
On 2018-01-19, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 19/01/2018 22:03, Grant Edwards wrote:
>> On 2018-01-19, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>> On 19/01/2018 21:54, Grant Edwards wrote:
>>>
Can exim transfer mail to an Exchange server that doesn't expose an
SMTP server?
>>>
>>> Errr, no. exim does SMTP.
>>>
On 2018-01-19, Grant Taylor wrote:
> On 01/19/2018 12:48 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
>> Yep, and it looks like the Postfix equivalent is a custom pipe transport.
>> Once you know what phrases to google for, it's a lot easier.
>
> *nod*
>
> I figured that you would be able to find something.
>
> Henc
On 01/19/2018 01:29 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
Aargh. smtpd. Typos like that certinaly don't help the confusion.
*chuckle* - Mistakes happen. - Context answered the question more
than 90%.
I'm going to try stunnel in front of the existing solution first.
If that doesn't work, I'll try
Hey everyone,
I tried building qtdeclarative-5.9.3 today, but the linker failed:
$ cat build.log
--- >8 ---
g++-6.4.0 -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,--enable-new-dtags -shared -o
libparticlesplugin.so .obj/plugin.o
-L/var/tmp/portage/dev-qt/qtdeclarative-5.9.3/work/qtdeclarative-opensource-
On 2018-01-19 20:19, Grant Edwards wrote:
> Can exim transfer mail to an Exchange server that doesn't expose an
> SMTP server?
> >>>
> >>> Errr, no. exim does SMTP.
> >>>
> >>> If the above is what you need, any orthodox mail server would need
> >>> to hand the mail over to something tha
On 01/19/2018 03:24 PM, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
But if I understand the problem now (a well sized if, LOL) that doesn't
by itself help you because the existing script is broken; replacing the
script is the main part of the problem. Right?
Grant E.'s existing script purportedly functions just fin
On 2018-01-19, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> On 2018-01-19 20:19, Grant Edwards wrote:
>
>> Can exim transfer mail to an Exchange server that doesn't expose an
>> SMTP server?
>> >>>
>> >>> Errr, no. exim does SMTP.
>> >>>
>> >>> If the above is what you need, any orthodox mail server would nee
On 01/19/2018 04:04 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
One of the hassles with those is that portage won't allow me to install
any of them because they conflict with msmtp, which is what I use for
sending normal e-mail.
I would expect that you can use any of those in place of msmtp to send
email too.
Hello,
On Fri, 19 Jan 2018, Christoph Böhmwalder wrote:
>I tried building qtdeclarative-5.9.3 today, but the linker failed:
>
>$ cat build.log
>g++-6.4.0 -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,--enable-new-dtags -shared -o
>libparticlesplugin.so .obj/plugin.o
>-L/var/tmp/portage/dev-qt/qtdeclarative-5.9.3/w
On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 12:28:49AM +0100, David Haller wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, 19 Jan 2018, Christoph Böhmwalder wrote:
> >I tried building qtdeclarative-5.9.3 today, but the linker failed:
> >
> >$ cat build.log
> >g++-6.4.0 -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,--enable-new-dtags -shared -o
> >libpar
On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 12:28:49AM +0100, David Haller wrote:
> revdep-rebuild -vp --library 'libstdc++.so.6' -- --exclude gcc
Oof, I just ran this anyways and a lot of packages popped up. Guess
I'll rebuild some stuff over the night and see if that fixes it :)
Thanks for your help so far!
On 2018-01-19, Grant Taylor wrote:
> On 01/19/2018 04:04 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
>> One of the hassles with those is that portage won't allow me to install
>> any of them because they conflict with msmtp, which is what I use for
>> sending normal e-mail.
>
> I would expect that you can use any
Thelma
On 01/17/2018 04:06 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> emerge -pqv app-office/libreoffice
> [ebuild R ] app-office/libreoffice-5.4.2.2 USE="bluetooth branding cups
> dbus gnome gtk java mysql (-coinmp) -collada -debug -eds (-firebird) -gltf
> -googledrive -gstreamer -gtk3 -jemallo
On 01/19/2018 04:58 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
That would require seperate outbound transports that are selected based
on how the mail was read: smtp vs. /usr/bin/sendmail (the real one).
Okay
I get the impression from exim and postfix docs that outbound routing
based on input method aren't
On 01/19/2018 05:30 PM, Grant Taylor wrote:
I'm trying to juggle the various pieces as I understand them to see if
everything can work together.
I have a fleeting thought that /might/ work. I want to write it down
before I loose it.
1) Configure Sendmail's MTA to not have any listening dae
On 2018-01-19 23:58, Grant Edwards wrote:
> That would require seperate outbound transports that are selected
> based on how the mail was read: smtp vs. /usr/bin/sendmail (the real
> one). I get the impression from exim and postfix docs that outbound
> routing based on input method aren't possibl
On 2018-01-20, Grant Taylor wrote:
> On 01/19/2018 04:58 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
>
>> That would require seperate outbound transports that are selected based
>> on how the mail was read: smtp vs. /usr/bin/sendmail (the real one).
>
> Okay
>
>> I get the impression from exim and postfix docs
On 01/19/2018 05:25 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
[snip]
>
> The strange part is that on the same box I created a new "user" and
> Libreoffice works just fine.
> But it will not work when I log in.
>
> I've deleted the folder setting. /home/joseph/.config/libreoffice/
> and copied the same fo
On 20/01/18 00:10, Christoph Böhmwalder wrote:
Hey everyone,
I tried building qtdeclarative-5.9.3 today, but the linker failed:
$ cat build.log
--- >8 ---
g++-6.4.0 -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,--enable-new-dtags -shared -o
libparticlesplugin.so .obj/plugin.o
-L/var/tmp/portage/dev-qt/q
Hi,
either by one of the last updates or by me while un-pulseaudio-fy
firefox (and removing pulseaudio afterwards) mpv is no longer willing
to play any sound.
Some informations:
[I] media-video/mpv
Available versions: 0.18.0-r1 0.25.0-r2 (~)0.26.0 (~)0.27.0-r1
[M](~)0.28.0 ** {+X +al
50 matches
Mail list logo
