Am Fri, 15 Dec 2017 07:38:01 +0100 schrieb J. Roeleveld:
> On Friday, December 15, 2017 4:05:41 AM CET Kai Krakow wrote:
>> Am Thu, 14 Dec 2017 08:54:59 +0100 schrieb J. Roeleveld:
>> >> Some historical correctnesses about Canek:
>> >>
>> >> - He has been here for years - He has contributed here
On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 07:38:01 +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > If you "rc-update del" a service, you wouldn't
> > prevent it from being started neither, just because OpenRC is still
> > able to pull it in as a dependency.
>
> True, except with OpenRC, all the config is located together. Not
> most
On 15/12/17 01:16, Marc Joliet wrote:
> [ Just to be clear: autofs is a Linux kernel feature, systemd just exposes it
> in an easy to use way. That is, BTW, a theme with systemd. ]
Likewise, cgroups. I believe Lennart is regularly "blamed" for this, but
it's been in the kernel a looonngg time, l
(I've got a bad habit of saving unfinished emails in the drafts folder and
then forgetting about them. I found this one while cleaning it up and thought
it might still be informative.)
On Tuesday 12 April 2016 10:56:56 Adam Carter wrote:
>> The problem was sys-boot/grub-2.02_beta2-r9, which UEF
(I've got a bad habit of saving unfinished emails in the drafts folder and then
forgetting
about them. I found this one while cleaning it up and thought it might still
be informative.)
Am Samstag, 15. Juli 2017, 17:47:18 CEST schrieb Peter Humphrey:
> On Saturday 15 Jul 2017 16:07:26 Marc Joli
kdeinit:
over-tight constraint to cmake version:
##
-- Found XCB_XCB: /usr/lib/libxcb.so (found version "1.12")
-- Found XCB: /usr/lib/libxcb.so (found version "1.12") found
components: XCB
CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:51 (find_package):
Could not find a config
Oh ye gods, not this fellow again.
Fellow gentoo-listers, please I beg you, with all my heart and all my
soul, I beg you:
Do not feed this troll. Please.
Alan
On 15/12/2017 16:44, Alan Grimes wrote:
> kdeinit:
>
> over-tight constraint to cmake version:
>
> #
On Friday, 15 December 2017 15:10:07 GMT Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Oh ye gods, not this fellow again.
>
> Fellow gentoo-listers, please I beg you, with all my heart and all my
> soul, I beg you:
>
> Do not feed this troll. Please.
>
> Alan
LOL!
Well, he didn't exactly ask a question to expect an
I did not have -O3 in my cflags because
A> most packages have an appropriate -O level set
B> Some packages are sensitive to the optimization flag and will
missbehave if set,
C> letting the optimization level default to whatever should always be
safe.
-> therefore I did not have any optimization s
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Oh ye gods, not this fellow again.
>
> Fellow gentoo-listers, please I beg you, with all my heart and all my
> soul, I beg you:
>
> Do not feed this troll. Please.
>
> Alan
>
>
I mentioned my blacklist the other day in another thread and how it has
only one person in it. I
Is he the fellow with the weird update script? The one that entertained us
so much for so long? Plus a total inability to listen to anyone else?
On 16 Dec 2017 12:28 AM, "Dale" wrote:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > Oh ye gods, not this fellow again.
> >
> > Fellow gentoo-listers, please I beg you, w
On Sat, 16 Dec 2017 00:32:11 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Is he the fellow with the weird update script? The one that entertained
> us so much for so long? Plus a total inability to listen to anyone else?
It's not an update script, it's a package manager stress tester, designed
to abuse portage
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Alan Grimes wrote:
> I did not have -O3 in my cflags because
>
> A> most packages have an appropriate -O level set
> B> Some packages are sensitive to the optimization flag and will
> missbehave if set,
> C> letting the optimization level default to whatever should
On 12/15/2017 09:11 PM, R0b0t1 wrote:
> 2) Firefox is the only application I run that crashes, and I don't
> know how to disable -O3 to potentially make it more stable.
Try USE=custom-optimization.
14 matches
Mail list logo
