On 09/23/2017 10:55 PM, Christoph Böhmwalder wrote:
Thanks for the suggestion Stephano. I tried re-emerging libpng and
running a clean Thunderbirs build overnight, however it still fails with
the same message.
--
Regards,
Christoph
I had a similar problem but it was a while ago (a couple
I think this is the first time a package tried to play this trick on me:
--- /var/db/pkg/dev-libs/qcustomplot-1.3.2/qcustomplot-1.3.2.ebuild
2017-05-21 13:38:15.482740587 -0700
+++ /usr/portage/dev-libs/qcustomplot/qcustomplot-1.3.2.ebuild 2017-09-22
19:27:30.0 -0700
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
>
>
> Is this an officially approved technique?? it is DIRTY.
I imagine that it is sanctioned, otherwise why would there be a
--changed-deps flag to emerge? Does seem dirty. Glad you asked the
question. Would love to learn why this is allowed. In my experience, it
happens quite often.
John
On Sun, 24 Sep 2017 10:37:53 -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> Is this an officially approved technique?? it is DIRTY.
If the change doesn't affect the installed code, it is encouraged to
avoid unnecessary rebuilding.
For example, a new version of LibreOffice or Chromium depends on libfoo,
but the
Hey, you fixed it (sort of)!
I tried your suggestions but diverted a little bit. Basically here's what
happened:
* depclean did nothing (except remove a few Thunderbird dependencies I actually
needed, whoops)
* `revdep-rebuild` also found nothing
* `ldd` gave /lib/libz.so.1.2.11
* I noticed tha
On Sunday, 24 September 2017 21:37:16 BST Christoph Böhmwalder wrote:
> Hey, you fixed it (sort of)!
>
> I tried your suggestions but diverted a little bit. Basically here's what
> happened:
>
> * depclean did nothing (except remove a few Thunderbird dependencies I
> actually needed, whoops) * `r
On 2017-09-24 21:05, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> If the change doesn't affect the installed code, it is encouraged to
> avoid unnecessary rebuilding.
>
> For example, a new version of LibreOffice or Chromium depends on
> libfoo, but the dev doesn't notice and already has libfoo installed so
> it works
On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 2:51 PM, John Blinka wrote:
>
>> Is this an officially approved technique?? it is DIRTY.
>
> I imagine that it is sanctioned, otherwise why would there be a
> --changed-deps flag to emerge? Does seem dirty. Glad you asked the
> question. Would love to learn why this is
On 09/23 06:39, R0b0t1 wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 1:21 PM, wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I want to compile wine to execute a single commandline tool.
> > That's it.
> >
> > The commandline tool is the AVR-assembler made by ATmel to recompile
> > a FORTH interpreter for the AVR-line of microcontrol
9 matches
Mail list logo
