You (Dale) seem to have corrected the multipart/alternative problem, except one
message (Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: downgrading glibc) where
multipart/alternative went through.
I would never design an email client to send multipart/alternative by default,
and might design an email client to
On 22/08/2017 17:41, Dale wrote:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> On 22/08/2017 15:01, Dale wrote:
>>> Howdy,
>>>
>>> I have this set to send text only for gentoo.org and kde.org. Someone
>>> replied making me think it is not doing as instructed, even tho settings
>>> says it is. Can someone tell me for
On Sat, 12 Aug 2017 11:43:24 -0700 Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> On 2017-08-12 13:21, John Covici wrote:
>
> > How about checking the various volumes rather than muting maybe some
> > of them are 0 or rather some negative number or something? Also, you
> > might delete the asound.state and let the syste
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 7:14 PM, John Blinka wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 6:51 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>>
>> Yes, and in fact it is in the output when emerge fails:
>> /var/tmp/portage/sys-kernel/spl-0.7.1/work/spl-0.7.1/config.log
>
Digging into config.log after a hiatus to attend to other
On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 14:07:42 +0200 Håkon Alstadheim wrote:
> I'm getting some noise in my logs when shutting down bcache.
> My system:
> Linux gentoo 4.12.7-gentoo #1 SMP Sun Aug 13 22:56:20 CEST 2017 x86_64
> Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
> Running as dom0 under
On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 18:22:54 + Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> Hello, Gentoo.
>
> I've almost got my new(ish) machine up and running. In particular, I've
> got an email server (s/qmail) running on it, the most difficult part of
> bringing up a new box.
>
> However, during the building, I discovered
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 7:13 PM, John Blinka wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 6:54 PM, John Covici wrote:
>
>> What is your umask? I had troubles like this when I had too
>> aggressive umask of I think 027 rather than 022.
>
> It is indeed 027, and I wondered whether that might have been what w
Thomas Mueller wrote:
> You (Dale) seem to have corrected the multipart/alternative problem, except
> one message (Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: downgrading glibc) where
> multipart/alternative went through.
>
> I would never design an email client to send multipart/alternative by
> default, an
On 23 August 2017 18:49:39 GMT+02:00, Dale wrote:
>Thomas Mueller wrote:
>> You (Dale) seem to have corrected the multipart/alternative problem,
>except one message (Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: downgrading glibc)
>where multipart/alternative went through.
>>
>> I would never design an email cli
On 23/08/2017 09:03, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> You (Dale) seem to have corrected the multipart/alternative problem, except
> one message (Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: downgrading glibc) where
> multipart/alternative went through.
>
> I would never design an email client to send multipart/alterna
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 23/08/2017 09:03, Thomas Mueller wrote:
>> You (Dale) seem to have corrected the multipart/alternative problem, except
>> one message (Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: downgrading glibc) where
>> multipart/alternative went through.
>>
>> I would never design an email clien
J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On 23 August 2017 18:49:39 GMT+02:00, Dale wrote:
>> Thomas Mueller wrote:
>>> You (Dale) seem to have corrected the multipart/alternative problem,
>> except one message (Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: downgrading glibc)
>> where multipart/alternative went through.
>>> I woul
On 23/08/2017 21:26, Dale wrote:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> On 23/08/2017 09:03, Thomas Mueller wrote:
>>> You (Dale) seem to have corrected the multipart/alternative problem, except
>>> one message (Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: downgrading glibc) where
>>> multipart/alternative went through.
>>
As an example, I am interested in characterizing the power consumption
of rendering a PDF document. I would hopefully only need to run the
renderer once.
I can use PowerTOP, but it seems to be limited to rough measurements
on the order of tenths of a watt. This measurement can be divided
among the
On 24/08/2017 00:29, R0b0t1 wrote:
> As an example, I am interested in characterizing the power consumption
> of rendering a PDF document. I would hopefully only need to run the
> renderer once.
>
> I can use PowerTOP, but it seems to be limited to rough measurements
> on the order of tenths of a
On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 11:21:12AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 20/08/2017 05:47, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I am getting random lockups on kernel 4.12.5.
> >
> > Three intel hosts (atom, early i7, i7 haswell) - its worse after a
> > suspend resume session. Because these are in
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 6:29 PM, R0b0t1 wrote:
> As an example, I am interested in characterizing the power consumption
> of rendering a PDF document. I would hopefully only need to run the
> renderer once.
The catch with that goal is that a) rendering a PDF is likely as much of a
ram and disk
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Poison BL. wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 6:29 PM, R0b0t1 wrote:
>
>> As an example, I am interested in characterizing the power consumption
>> of rendering a PDF document. I would hopefully only need to run the
>> renderer once.
>
>
> ... That's potentially us
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 05:29:13PM -0500, R0b0t1 wrote:
> As an example, I am interested in characterizing the power consumption
> of rendering a PDF document. I would hopefully only need to run the
> renderer once.
I remember in college some interesting work in security-related stuff
that was abo
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 5:49 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 24/08/2017 00:29, R0b0t1 wrote:
>> As an example, I am interested in characterizing the power consumption
>> of rendering a PDF document. I would hopefully only need to run the
>> renderer once.
>>
>> I can use PowerTOP, but it seems to be
20 matches
Mail list logo
