On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 4:30 AM, Stroller
wrote:
>
>> On 13 May 2017, at 09:46, Jorge Almeida wrote:
>>
>> In case someone is using kernel 4.11: I tried it and everything seems
>> fine, except that the linux logo on the boot screen (i.e. tty1) is
>> gone. It was there before (with 4.10.9), and I
Am Sun, 14 May 2017 08:32:46 +0100
schrieb Jorge Almeida :
> On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 4:30 AM, Stroller
> wrote:
> >
> >> On 13 May 2017, at 09:46, Jorge Almeida
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> In case someone is using kernel 4.11: I tried it and everything
> >> seems fine, except that the linux logo on
Am Sun, 14 May 2017 02:59:41 +0100
schrieb lee :
> Kai Krakow writes:
>
> > Am Sat, 29 Apr 2017 20:38:24 +0100
> > schrieb lee :
> >
> >> Kai Krakow writes:
> >>
> [...]
> [...]
> [...]
> >>
> >> Yes, I'm using it mostly for backups/copies.
> >>
> >> The problem is that ftp is i
On Saturday 13 May 2017 23:58:17 R0b0t1 wrote:
> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 1:40 AM, Mick wrote:
> > On Monday 01 May 2017 22:36:00 Nils Freydank wrote:
> >> On Sat, 30 Apr 2017 19:04:06 +0200 Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> >> > [...]
> >> > I fail to see why FTP needs to be replaced: it works, it is
> >>
Many thanks for your hints!
On 05/14/2017 07:13:05 AM, Walter Dnes wrote:
Why aren't you running "-march=native"? You're probably missing
quite
a few features of your cpu. BTW, "-march=native" implies
"-mtune=native"
and "-msse3" (if the cpu supports it). Out of sheer curiousity, what
d
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 9:31 AM, Kai Krakow wrote:
> Am Sun, 14 May 2017 08:32:46 +0100
> schrieb Jorge Almeida :
>> >> In case someone is using kernel 4.11: I tried it and everything
>> >> seems fine, except that the linux logo on the boot screen (i.e.
>> >> tty1) is gone. It was there before (w
> > These certificates are a very stupid thing. They are utterly
> > complicated, you have to self-sign them which produces warnings, and
> > they require to have the host name within them as if the host wasn't
> > known by several different names.
>
> Use LetsEncrypt then, you can add any number
Am Sun, 14 May 2017 02:48:46 +0100
schrieb lee :
> Kai Krakow writes:
>
> > Am Sat, 29 Apr 2017 20:30:03 +0100
> > schrieb lee :
> >
> >> Danny YUE writes:
> >>
> [...]
> [...]
> [...]
> >>
> >> Doesn't that require ssh access? And how do you explain that to
> >> ppl finding it
Hi,
unwind tables sounds really interesting, but does it affect the binary size
when I compile with -O2 anyway?
Regards,
Rasmus
Original Message
On 14 May 2017, 07:13, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 10:21:19AM +0200, Helmut Jarausch wrote
>
> I have switched to gcc
On Sun, 14 May 2017 02:05:58 +0100, lee wrote:
> > It will only remove things that it deems not needed. Usually these are
> > packages that have just been upgraded.
>
> Yes, the sources wouldn't be needed if I had upgraded the kernel. Still
> one might expect it to figure out which kernel is i
Am Sun, 14 May 2017 09:52:41 +0100
schrieb Mick :
> On Saturday 13 May 2017 23:58:17 R0b0t1 wrote:
> > I had some problems setting up OpenVPN that were solved by using
> > per-client public keys. That seems to be the best supported
> > configuration (as well as the most secure). Windows-side using
Am Sun, 14 May 2017 10:11:31 +0100
schrieb Jorge Almeida :
> On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 9:31 AM, Kai Krakow
> wrote:
> > Am Sun, 14 May 2017 08:32:46 +0100
> > schrieb Jorge Almeida :
>
> [...]
>
>
> >> $ zgrep -i logo /proc/config.gz
> >> CONFIG_LOGO=y
> >> # CONFIG_LOGO_LINUX_MONO is not s
On Sun, 14 May 2017 02:48:46 +0100, lee wrote:
> > But you could offer access via OpenVPN and tunnel samba through
> > that.
>
> I haven't been able yet to figure out what implications creating a VPN
> has. I understand it's supposed to connect networks through a secured
> tunnel, but what kin
Am Sun, 14 May 2017 02:18:56 +0100
schrieb lee :
> Kai Krakow writes:
>
> > Am Sat, 29 Apr 2017 20:02:57 +0100
> > schrieb lee :
> >
> >> Alan McKinnon writes:
> >>
> [...]
> [...]
> [...]
> >>
> >> The intended users are incompetent, hence it is too difficult to
> >> use ...
>
Hello, Jorge.
On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 09:46:41 +0100, Jorge Almeida wrote:
> In case someone is using kernel 4.11: I tried it and everything seems
> fine, except that the linux logo on the boot screen (i.e. tty1) is
> gone. It was there before (with 4.10.9), and I used make oldconfig.
> So, anyon
Am Sun, 14 May 2017 01:28:55 +0100
schrieb lee :
> Kai Krakow writes:
>
> > Am Sat, 29 Apr 2017 22:02:51 -0400
> > schrieb "Walter Dnes" :
> >
> >> Then there's always "sneakernet". To quote Andrew Tanenbaum from
> >> 1981
> >>
> [...]
> >
> > Hehe, with the improvements in internet c
Am Sun, 14 May 2017 01:25:24 +0100
schrieb lee :
> "Poison BL." writes:
>
> > On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 9:11 PM, lee wrote:
> >>
> >> "Poison BL." writes:
> [...]
> > trust
> [...]
> >>
> >> Why not? (12GB are nowhere close to half a petabyte ...)
> >
> > Ah... I completely misrea
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Kai Krakow wrote:
> Am Sun, 14 May 2017 10:11:31 +0100
> schrieb Jorge Almeida :
>>
>>
>> I suppose it's goodbye to Tux, for now. I was hoping someone else
>> would be using the same kernel...
>
> You could setup plymouth and I'm pretty sure there should be a
> f
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>
> I see 16 Tuxen at boot up, no problem.
A whole raft, then. (Or is it a waddle?) I was happy enough with my
huddle of 4...
>
> Something strange happened when I installed the 4.11.0 sources - all the
> options were initialised to what
>
> the Gentoo dev list. I'd normally just link to a mail archive, but it's
>> too new to have been archived yet. Here's a copy of the proposed news
>> item. Note the example error message about relocation against .rodata
>>
>>
On 05/13/2017 06:05 PM, lee wrote:
> It worked --- now some time when I do upgrade the kernel, I somehow need
> to remove these sources from the world list, I guess ...
>
That's easy: `emerge --deselect sys-kernel/gentoo-sources:4.4.52` undoes
my previous suggestion.
Dan
Adam Carter wrote:
> Tried kernels 4.10.13 and 4.11, with
> CONFIG_GART_IOMMU=y
> CONFIG_IOMMU_HELPER=y
> CONFIG_IOMMU_API=y
> CONFIG_IOMMU_SUPPORT=y
> CONFIG_IOMMU_IOVA=y
> CONFIG_AMD_IOMMU=y
> CONFIG_AMD_IOMMU_V2=m
> Chipset is 990FX, and AFAICT the V2 is for the APU (bdver3 and 4 vintage).
>
> W
On 05/14/2017 01:31 AM, Adam Carter wrote:
Tried kernels 4.10.13 and 4.11, with
CONFIG_GART_IOMMU=y
CONFIG_IOMMU_HELPER=y
CONFIG_IOMMU_API=y
CONFIG_IOMMU_SUPPORT=y
CONFIG_IOMMU_IOVA=y
CONFIG_AMD_IOMMU=y
CONFIG_AMD_IOMMU_V2=m
Chipset is 990FX, and AFAICT the V2 is for the APU (bdver3 and 4 vintag
On 03/05/2017 22:04, lee wrote:
> Alan McKinnon writes:
>
>> On 30/04/2017 03:11, lee wrote:
>>> "Poison BL." writes:
>>>
On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 3:24 PM, lee wrote:
> Mick writes:
>
>> On Tuesday 25 Apr 2017 16:45:37 Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>> On 25/04/2017 16:29, lee
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 3:52 AM, Mick wrote:
>> I had some problems setting up OpenVPN that were solved by using
>> per-client public keys. That seems to be the best supported
>> configuration (as well as the most secure). Windows-side using
>> OpenVPN-GUI is very easy.
>>
>> OpenVPN tends to have
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 4:47 PM, R0b0t1 wrote:
> That is only in one setup. It is possible to assign an IP address to
> OpenVPN such that you will need any traffic to cross onto your LAN.
>
Whoops: "It is possible to assign an IP address to OpenVPN such that
you will need routing rules for any tr
On 05/14/2017 12:31 AM, Adam Carter wrote:
> Tried kernels 4.10.13 and 4.11, with
> CONFIG_GART_IOMMU=y
> CONFIG_IOMMU_HELPER=y
> CONFIG_IOMMU_API=y
> CONFIG_IOMMU_SUPPORT=y
> CONFIG_IOMMU_IOVA=y
> CONFIG_AMD_IOMMU=y
> CONFIG_AMD_IOMMU_V2=m
> Chipset is 990FX, and AFAICT the V2 is for the APU (bdve
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 11:05:14AM +0200, Helmut Jarausch wrote
> Many thanks for your hints!
>
> On 05/14/2017 07:13:05 AM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> > Out of sheer curiousity, what
> > does gcc report as your native cpu when you run...
> >
> > gcc -c -Q -march=native --help=target | grep march=
>
>
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 05:22:27AM -0400, Rasmus Thomsen wrote
> Hi,
>
> unwind tables sounds really interesting, but does it affect the
> binary size when I compile with -O2 anyway?
Yes, because it's a different part of the build. Personal experience;
I do the contributed SSE-only Pale Moon b
I've added iommu=pt to my kernel command line, and now have;
[1.240242] AMD-Vi: Found IOMMU at :00:00.2 cap 0x40
I was looking at IOMMU in the hope that my Win10 vmware guest would be more
stable. No change, however.
> APU?
> I was under the impression that those CPU's used a different
On a Phenom II?Yeah, I just retired mine a month ago. On that
> system, the IOMMU hardware was kinda a legacy orphan thingy, I had to go
> through all kinds of gyrations on the kernel command line in order to
> initialize it correctly. I think I had it off in the bios, then enabled
> it using
On Sun, 14 May 2017 02:59:41 +0100
lee wrote:
> That requires shell access.
Not necessarily, it just requires a competent ISP.
For instance, there's no shell access on github, but there's still
ssh-based sync.
So you just need to have a restricted environment that only allows
spawning of the s
On 2017-05-14 20:07, Corbin Bird wrote:
> Background / System Info : 2 systems.
> Chipset 990FX, FX-9590 ( -march=bdver2 / Fam15h )
> Chipset 790FX, PhenomII 980 ( -march=amdfam10 / Fam10h )
> Gentoo x86_64, multilib, Kernel 4.9.x
> IOMMU enabled in UEFI, BIOS.
> General Info : ( if you don't kno
33 matches
Mail list logo
