On 14.02.2017 03:12, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Johannes Rosenberger [17-02-14 02:43]:
>> On 13.02.2017 19:20, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
>>> Johannes Rosenberger [17-02-13 19:04]:
On 13.02.2017 17:57, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Hogren [17-02-13 17:06]:
>> On 13/02/2017 04:
Harry Putnam wrote:
Willie Mattthews writes:
Not sure I'm following you here. THe guest addtions come with the
Vbox and I've already installed them.
This is a windows 10 host and the vbox is the one installable on
windows. This is version 5.1.14
Guest additinos have nothing to do with gentoo
Time ago when I upgraded nvidia-drivers from 295 to 3xx series there was no way to start
X, it would crash immediately with my custom built kernel. After many tests I switched to
a kernel config taken from a live CD which worked (and still works) fine with the 3xx
nvidia-drivers but pulls in a l
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 12:33 PM, Raffaele Belardi
wrote:
> Time ago when I upgraded nvidia-drivers from 295 to 3xx series there was no
> way to start X, it would crash immediately with my custom built kernel.
> After many tests I switched to a kernel config taken from a live CD which
> worked (an
On 02/14/17 07:30, Raffaele Belardi wrote:
Harry Putnam wrote:
Willie Mattthews writes:
Not sure I'm following you here. THe guest addtions come with the
Vbox and I've already installed them.
This is a windows 10 host and the vbox is the one installable on
windows. This is version 5.1.14
Gu
disable systemd via package mask;
https://github.com/dantrell/gentoo-project-gnome-without-systemd/blob/master/HACKING.md#differences-between-gnome-profiles
user flag settings
On Feb 10, 2017 6:02 AM, "Alan McKinnon" wrote:
> On 10/02/2017 06:15, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> > On 02/09/201
Mick wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 Feb 2017 01:51:01 wabe wrote:
> > Mick wrote:
>
> > > Have you noticed a difference between mounting partitions on them
> > > with the discard option, Vs running fstrim on a cron job?
> >
> > I noticed a big performance impact with my old Corsair 60GB SSD
> > (F
Setup:
Installing X on Vbox vm runnning gentoo (amd64 not strict). Host
is win10 (64bit)
Installing the xorg-server is calling for the installation of
app-emulation/virtualbox-guest-additions-5.0.32
However, my version of vbox is for a windows host (5.1.14). And
actually has the guest ad
On 14.02.2017 16:09, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Setup:
>
>Installing X on Vbox vm runnning gentoo (amd64 not strict). Host
>is win10 (64bit)
>
> Installing the xorg-server is calling for the installation of
> app-emulation/virtualbox-guest-additions-5.0.32
>
> However, my version of vbox is for
Harry Putnam wrote:
Setup:
Installing X on Vbox vm runnning gentoo (amd64 not strict). Host
is win10 (64bit)
Installing the xorg-server is calling for the installation of
app-emulation/virtualbox-guest-additions-5.0.32
However, my version of vbox is for a windows host (5.1.14). And
act
The box that I'm upgrading is giving me:
[blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-server-1.18[udev] required by
(x11-drivers/xf86-input-evdev-2.10.3:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge)
^^
the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> The box that I'm upgrading is giving me:
>
> [blocks B ] (" x11-base/xorg-drivers-1.18-r1)
>
> !!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been
> pulled !!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict:
>
> x11-base/xorg-serve
the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
The box that I'm upgrading is giving me:
[blocks B ]
...
But this is a video driver my box is using, and I'm logged into it directly so
if I unmerge the drive in use the xorg-server will crash and I I'll be in a
login prompt, isn't it?
Is it better to do t
Johannes Rosenberger writes:
>> Can anyone offer suggestions about this... is it even the right way to
>> proceed?
>>
>>
>
> Hello!
>
> I have portage-2.3.3 installed and in my portage manpage it is mentioned:
>
> The file shall reside in etc/(make.profile|portage/(make.)?profile) and
> the synta
On 02/13/2017 10:25 PM, Mick wrote:
> I was using discard and can't say I
> noticed any performance penalty on the OCZ drive. I removed it and set up a
> fstrim cron job and suddenly there is a major I/O bottleneck when the cron
> job
> runs. Perhaps I should be running it more often ...
>
On 02/13/2017 10:17 AM, Poison BL. wrote:
>
> I've had more than one spinning rust drive fail hard over the years as
> well, though yes, you do usually have some chance of recovery from
> those. Gambling on that chance by leaving a given disk as a single point
> of failure is still a bad idea, spi
On 02/14/2017 02:33 AM, Raffaele Belardi wrote:
> Time ago when I upgraded nvidia-drivers from 295 to 3xx series there was
> no way to start X, it would crash immediately with my custom built
> kernel. After many tests I switched to a kernel config taken from a live
> CD which worked (and still wor
On 02/05/2017 05:12 PM, Alex Thorne wrote:
> A wiki article would be great. I'd be happy to contribute my experiences
> with my Surface Pro 4 if I eventually get round to installing Gentoo on it.
>
I'm still plodding away at this. I found some patches to enable
multitouch and some other bits but
Setup: VBox vm running gentoo(amd64) guest on a win-10 (64bit) host
Hardware: HP xw8600 - 2x Xeon CPU X5450 @ 3.00GHz - 32 GB ram
Harry Putnam writes:
[...]
> Sorry to post the raw pile of output but last time a used a http link
> to a long log someone here told me that many of you would not
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Daniel Frey wrote:
> On 02/13/2017 10:17 AM, Poison BL. wrote:
> >
> > I've had more than one spinning rust drive fail hard over the years as
> > well, though yes, you do usually have some chance of recovery from
> > those. Gambling on that chance by leaving a giv
I had a crucial SSD drive too and it failed in the warranty but as I
didn't have the receipt they refused to honor it and said I was out of
warranty as based on the date they sold it to the store not the day the
store sold it to me.
Apparently failures on my model were a very common thing due to
On 14.02.2017 21:22, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Johannes Rosenberger writes:
>
>>> Can anyone offer suggestions about this... is it even the right way to
>>> proceed?
>>>
>>>
>> Hello!
>>
>> I have portage-2.3.3 installed and in my portage manpage it is mentioned:
>>
>> The file shall reside in etc/(ma
When i download Gentoo Linux the file name might be called something like:
livedvd-amd64-multilib-20160704.iso
This might be fine if you just want that file and want to use it
straight away.
But lets say like i just did downloaded multiple linux distributions
because i want to test them out s
On 15.02.2017 00:00, scootergrisen wrote:
> When i download Gentoo Linux the file name might be called something
> like:
> livedvd-amd64-multilib-20160704.iso
>
> This might be fine if you just want that file and want to use it
> straight away.
>
> But lets say like i just did downloaded multiple
All this raises an interesting question: How much effort is it
reasonable to expect a user to undertake just to use one of these
drives? I mean it's going to be very tough to argue that it should
require more than "plug in -> add partitions > boogie" I mean half of
what I'm hearing about how to se
On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 15:22:50 -0500, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Something else about this entry in `man portage':
>
> [...]
> SYNOPSIS
>/etc/portage/make.profile/ or /etc/make.profile/
> site-specific overrides go in /etc/portage/profile/
> deprecated
>
On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 23:00:03 +0100, Johannes Rosenberger wrote:
> I find the package.*-dirs very nice, too. Unfortunately, the tools like
> emerge, flaggie etc. seem to not always use the same file to write to,
> so the files get messed up over time.
Portage always writes to the end of the last
On Tuesday 14 Feb 2017 18:29:49 Alan Grimes wrote:
> Right now my drive is set up as if it were a black box that contains bits.
> I don't think it's reasonable for me to do anything more than that. =\
Well, no, but then you wouldn't, would you? Anybody else might take an
interest in the health o
Johannes Rosenberger wrote:
> On 15.02.2017 00:00, scootergrisen wrote:
>> When i download Gentoo Linux the file name might be called something
>> like:
>> livedvd-amd64-multilib-20160704.iso
>>
>> This might be fine if you just want that file and want to use it
>> straight away.
>>
>> But lets say
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 6:29 PM, Alan Grimes wrote:
> All this raises an interesting question: How much effort is it
> reasonable to expect a user to undertake just to use one of these
> drives? I mean it's going to be very tough to argue that it should
> require more than "plug in -> add partiti
Can any say if pentoo is still under developement?
On 02/14/2017 09:09 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Can any say if pentoo is still under developement?
>
>
It looks like they have a beta from January.
http://mirror.switch.ch/ftp/mirror/pentoo/Beta/Pentoo_amd64_default/
--
Willie Matthews
matthews.willi...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: O
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 7:00 AM, scootergrisen wrote:
> So would it not be better to use a file name like this?:
> gentoo-livedvd-amd64-multilib-20160704.iso
This is the correct approach, but people here hate making changes
unless it's coming from them and gives them merit.
--
konsolebox
33 matches
Mail list logo
