On Wednesday 13 Jul 2016 23:04:57 Mick wrote:
> On Thursday 14 Jul 2016 04:50:57 Michael Palimaka wrote:
> > On 13/07/16 07:56, Mick wrote:
> > > Unlike Neil I found Plasma 5 a major climb down from KDE4 in terms of
> > > interface usability. A lot of things were broken and for me still are.
> > >
Hello list,
After this morning's sync, both versions 4.4.6 and 4.6.4 of gentoo-sources
have disappeared. Is this just finger trouble in the server chain? I get the
same with UK and US sync servers.
--
Rgds
Peter
On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 5:12 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>
> After this morning's sync, both versions 4.4.6 and 4.6.4 of gentoo-sources
> have disappeared. Is this just finger trouble in the server chain? I get the
> same with UK and US sync servers.
>
No idea, but upstream is up to 4.4.19, and 4.6
On Sunday 21 Aug 2016 05:55:06 Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 5:12 AM, Peter Humphrey
wrote:
> > After this morning's sync, both versions 4.4.6 and 4.6.4 of
> > gentoo-sources have disappeared. Is this just finger trouble in the
> > server chain? I get the same with UK and US sync
On Sun Aug 21 10:12:59 2016, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> After this morning's sync, both versions 4.4.6 and 4.6.4 of gentoo-sources
> have disappeared. Is this just finger trouble in the server chain? I get the
> same with UK and US sync servers.
I use webrsync and I’m also seeing t
On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 6:20 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Sunday 21 Aug 2016 05:55:06 Rich Freeman wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 5:12 AM, Peter Humphrey
> wrote:
>> > After this morning's sync, both versions 4.4.6 and 4.6.4 of
>> > gentoo-sources have disappeared. Is this just finger troubl
On Sunday 21 Aug 2016 07:28:17 Rich Freeman wrote:
> ... there is nothing wrong with having some internal QA on kernel
> releases. 4.1 had a nasty memory leak a release or two ago that was
> killing my system after only an hour or two uptime. They took over a
> week to stabilize the fix as well
On Sun Aug 21 15:23:42 2016, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Sound policy, I'm sure. How does an ordinary mortal know which versions are
> here for the long term?
It’s referenced on https://www.kernel.org/category/releases.html
--
alarig
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Sunday 21 Aug 2016 07:28:17 Rich Freeman wrote:
>
>> ... there is nothing wrong with having some internal QA on kernel
>> releases. 4.1 had a nasty memory leak a release or two ago that was
>> killing my system after only an hour or two
On Sunday 21 Aug 2016 10:50:55 Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Peter Humphrey
wrote:
> > On Sunday 21 Aug 2016 07:28:17 Rich Freeman wrote:
> >> ... there is nothing wrong with having some internal QA on kernel
> >> releases. 4.1 had a nasty memory leak a release or two a
Hi again !
Please, if you answer me at the previous message
use the following adress:
roger.c...@free.fr
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 6:41 PM, Raymond Jennings
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 1:32 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> >>
> >> And since it uses udev it is fairly robust against things like adding
> >> a drive and now the kernel re-letters e
12 matches
Mail list logo
