I got this after an update yesterday and was left puzzled as to what I am
meant to do ...
!!! The following installed packages are masked:
- www-client/opera-12.16_p1860-r1::gentoo (masked by: OPERA-12 license(s))
A copy of the 'OPERA-12' license is located at
'/usr/portage/licenses/OPERA-12'.
On 31/07/2016 09:56, Mick wrote:
> I got this after an update yesterday and was left puzzled as to what I am
> meant to do ...
>
> !!! The following installed packages are masked:
> - www-client/opera-12.16_p1860-r1::gentoo (masked by: OPERA-12 license(s))
> A copy of the 'OPERA-12' license is lo
On Sunday 31 Jul 2016 11:09:36 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 31/07/2016 09:56, Mick wrote:
> > I got this after an update yesterday and was left puzzled as to what I am
> > meant to do ...
> >
> > !!! The following installed packages are masked:
> > - www-client/opera-12.16_p1860-r1::gentoo (masked by
Hello,
On Sat, 30 Jul 2016, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
>David Haller [16-07-30 13:24]:
[..]
>> I've got it working with the attached patch in
>> /etc/portage/patches/x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-367.35/
[..]
>Short qyestion: How can I apply it...I mean...as soon as I do an
>emerge, either the origi
On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 10:45:55 +0100 Mick wrote:
> On Sunday 31 Jul 2016 11:09:36 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On 31/07/2016 09:56, Mick wrote:
> > > I got this after an update yesterday and was left puzzled as to what I am
> > > meant to do ...
> > >
> > > !!! The following installed packages are maske
On Sunday 31 Jul 2016 13:27:59 Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 10:45:55 +0100 Mick wrote:
> > On Sunday 31 Jul 2016 11:09:36 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > > On 31/07/2016 09:56, Mick wrote:
> > > > I got this after an update yesterday and was left puzzled as to what I
> > > > am
> > > > me
Hello list,
I've just encountered something I can't explain. Can anyone here?
~ $ genlop -c -f /mnt/rescue/var/log/emerge.log
using logfile /mnt/rescue/var/log/emerge.log
Currently merging 281 out of 287
* net-libs/gnutls-3.3.24
current merge time: 1 minute and 44 seconds.
ETA
Hi,
for my backups I use a 3TB USB drive (one big ext4 partition) without any
problems. Just plug in the cable, mount it and perform the backup. The
partition (sdi1) is detected an mountable without any problems:
=== %< ==
$ ls -l /dev/disk/by-id
total 0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 roo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/31/2016 06:47 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I've just encountered something I can't explain. Can anyone here?
>
> ~ $ genlop -c -f /mnt/rescue/var/log/emerge.log
> using logfile /mnt/rescue/var/log/emerge.log
>
> Currently mer
On 07/31/2016 06:37 AM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi,
>
> for my backups I use a 3TB USB drive (one big ext4 partition) without any
> problems. Just plug in the cable, mount it and perform the backup. The
> partition (sdi1) is detected an mountable without any problems:
>
> === %<
On Sunday 31 Jul 2016 10:48:33 Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> On 07/31/2016 06:47 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > I've just encountered something I can't explain. Can anyone here?
> >
> > ~ $ genlop -c -f /mnt/rescue/var/log/emerge.log
> > using logfile /mnt/rescue/var/log/emerge.log
> > Currently mer
On 07/31/2016 08:37 AM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Hi,
for my backups I use a 3TB USB drive (one big ext4 partition) without any
problems. Just plug in the cable, mount it and perform the backup. The
partition (sdi1) is detected an mountable without any problems:
this tells you the device is valid a
Hi Daniel,
thanks for your response.
Daniel Frey wrote:
[snip]
> I can only think of two reasons, the kernel on the livecd doesn't
> support GPT (which is unlikely)
That would be really strange. However, how can I prove it?
> or you're booting a 32-bit kernel live
> USB. I am reasonably cert
Hi James,
james wrote:
> On 07/31/2016 08:37 AM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> for my backups I use a 3TB USB drive (one big ext4 partition) without any
>> problems. Just plug in the cable, mount it and perform the backup. The
>> partition (sdi1) is detected an mountable without any problems:
On Sunday 31 Jul 2016 19:14:45 Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> thanks for your response.
>
> Daniel Frey wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > I can only think of two reasons, the kernel on the livecd doesn't
> > support GPT (which is unlikely)
>
> That would be really strange. However, how can I prov
Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> thanks for your response.
>
> Daniel Frey wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>> I can only think of two reasons, the kernel on the livecd doesn't
>> support GPT (which is unlikely)
>
> That would be really strange. However, how can I prove it?
>
>> or you're booting a
On Sun Jul 31 19:56:33 2016, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> However, it's mounted successfully, see system logs:
>
> %<
> [22735.626752] sd 13:0:0:0: [sdi] 732566646 4096-byte logical blocks: (3.00
> TB/2.73 TiB)
> [22735.629255] sdi: sdi1
> [23414.06631
Hi All,
I am dipping my toe into cross-compile territory, in order to build i686
binaries for a 32bit box, which is too old to do its own emerges. I am using
an amd64 box which is significantly faster to do all the heavy lifting and
started applying this page:
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Emb
On 07/31/2016 12:56 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Jörg Schaible wrote:
Hi Daniel,
thanks for your response.
Daniel Frey wrote:
[snip]
I can only think of two reasons, the kernel on the livecd doesn't
support GPT (which is unlikely)
That would be really strange. However, how can I prove it?
On 07/31/2016 01:40 PM, Mick wrote:
Hi All,
I am dipping my toe into cross-compile territory, in order to build i686
binaries for a 32bit box, which is too old to do its own emerges.
An excellent idea. As one who has performed the upgrade/downgrade
surgery on many systems; the single biggest
On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 07:40:37PM +0100, Mick wrote:
>
> * ARCH is not set... Are you missing the '/usr/i686-pc-linux-
> * gnu/etc/portage/make.profile' symlink? Is the symlink correct? Is your
> * portage tree complete?
> ===
>
> As far as I can tell the link is there:
>
> # ls
On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 19:40:37 +0100 Mick wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am dipping my toe into cross-compile territory, in order to build i686
> binaries for a 32bit box, which is too old to do its own emerges. I am using
> an amd64 box which is significantly faster to do all the heavy lifting and
> st
Hi Mick,
Mick wrote:
> On Sunday 31 Jul 2016 19:14:45 Jörg Schaible wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> thanks for your response.
>>
>> Daniel Frey wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>> > I can only think of two reasons, the kernel on the livecd doesn't
>> > support GPT (which is unlikely)
>>
>> That would be re
james wrote:
> On 07/31/2016 12:56 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>> Jörg Schaible wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>
>>> thanks for your response.
>>>
>>> Daniel Frey wrote:
>>>
>>> [snip]
>>>
I can only think of two reasons, the kernel on the livecd doesn't
support GPT (which is unlikely)
>>>
>>>
On Sunday 31 Jul 2016 22:38:22 Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi Mick,
>
> Mick wrote:
> > On Sunday 31 Jul 2016 19:14:45 Jörg Schaible wrote:
> >> Hi Daniel,
> >>
> >> thanks for your response.
> >>
> >> Daniel Frey wrote:
> >>
> >> [snip]
> >>
> >> > I can only think of two reasons, the kernel on th
On Sunday 31 Jul 2016 23:18:00 Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 19:40:37 +0100 Mick wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I am dipping my toe into cross-compile territory, in order to build i686
> > binaries for a 32bit box, which is too old to do its own emerges. I am
> > using an amd64 box wh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/31/2016 12:14 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Sunday 31 Jul 2016 10:48:33 Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
>> On 07/31/2016 06:47 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>>> I've just encountered something I can't explain. Can anyone here?
>>>
>>> ~ $ genlop -c -f /
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 7:01 PM, Mick wrote:
> Yes, same here, I would be interested to hear what the Postgres dev says,
> should he respond to it.
>
One PostgreSQL dev's response - https://t.co/LfPlIPWulc
--
{
"name": "douglas j hunley",
"email": "doug.hun...@gmail.com",
"social": [
On Sunday, July 31, 2016 03:37:55 PM Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi,
>
> for my backups I use a 3TB USB drive (one big ext4 partition) without any
> problems. Just plug in the cable, mount it and perform the backup. The
> partition (sdi1) is detected an mountable without any problems:
>
>
29 matches
Mail list logo
