On Tue, 31 May 2016 18:44:10 +0100, Mick wrote:
> > The operator user was not used by CoreOS, but existed because it
> > exists in the Gentoo Portage system from which CoreOS is derived.
> >
> >
> > Full read [1]. It kinda shows that CoreOS is derived from Gentoo
> > and not ChromeOS; at least w
On Tue, 31 May 2016 22:05:24 + (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote:
> emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy
> "dev-python/cairocffi[python_targets_python2_7(-)?,python_targets_python3_3(-)?,python_targets_python3_4(-)?,python_targets_python3_5(-)?,-python_single_target_python2_7(-),-python_single_ta
Howdy,
I suspect there may be more people than me wondering about this one. I
have quite a few entries in /etc/portage files, especially keywords.
I'd like to know if there is a tool that deletes no longer needed
entries itself. I been using eix-test-obsolete but doing it manually
can take quit
On 06/01/2016 02:28 AM, Dale wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I suspect there may be more people than me wondering about this one. I
> have quite a few entries in /etc/portage files, especially keywords.
> I'd like to know if there is a tool that deletes no longer needed
> entries itself. I been using eix-te
Christopher J. Camisa wrote:
> On 06/01/2016 02:28 AM, Dale wrote:
>> Howdy,
>>
>> I suspect there may be more people than me wondering about this one. I
>> have quite a few entries in /etc/portage files, especially keywords.
>> I'd like to know if there is a tool that deletes no longer needed
>>
Dale wrote:
> Christopher J. Camisa wrote:
>> On 06/01/2016 02:28 AM, Dale wrote:
>>> Howdy,
>>>
>>> I suspect there may be more people than me wondering about this one. I
>>> have quite a few entries in /etc/portage files, especially keywords.
>>> I'd like to know if there is a tool that deletes
On 06/01/2016 03:56 AM, Dale wrote:
> Dale wrote:
>> Christopher J. Camisa wrote:
>>> On 06/01/2016 02:28 AM, Dale wrote:
Howdy,
I suspect there may be more people than me wondering about this one. I
have quite a few entries in /etc/portage files, especially keywords.
I'd
Christopher J. Camisa wrote:
> Hi Dale,
>
> Try again, but this time use the --exact option to your invocation
> on the command line.
>
> Kind Regards,
> -Camisa
I read that man page at least twice. How did I miss that? That does
what I need. I lose the comments in the old file of course bu
On 2016-06-01, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 31 May 2016 22:05:24 + (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote:
>
>> emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy
>> "dev-python/cairocffi[python_targets_python2_7(-)?,python_targets_python3_3(-)?,python_targets_python3_4(-)?,python_targets_python3_5(-)?,-python_si
Hello list,
I have quite a few sites that firefox doesn't display properly. It seems to
be short of some symbols. I've attached two screen shots; in the first, the
peculiar thing next to the text should (I think) be a broad up-arrow; and
the second shows some buttons from twitter which occur in ma
On 06/01/2016 08:38 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I have quite a few sites that firefox doesn't display properly. It seems to
> be short of some symbols. I've attached two screen shots; in the first, the
> peculiar thing next to the text should (I think) be a broad up-arrow; and
> th
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 04:38:17PM +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I have quite a few sites that firefox doesn't display properly. It seems to
> be short of some symbols. I've attached two screen shots; in the first, the
> peculiar thing next to the text should (I think) be a broad
On Wednesday 01 Jun 2016 08:46:35 Daniel Frey wrote:
> Do you have all the required fonts installed? If you look back a couple
> months I had unreadable prints and distortion and it turned out to be a
> font misconfiguration issue.
I can't go back that far locally, but these are the fonts I have:
On Wednesday 01 Jun 2016 17:46:39 Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 04:38:17PM +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > Hello list,
> >
> > I have quite a few sites that firefox doesn't display properly. It seems
> > to be short of some symbols. I've attached two screen shots; in the
> >
On 06/01/2016 08:58 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 Jun 2016 08:46:35 Daniel Frey wrote:
>
>> Do you have all the required fonts installed? If you look back a couple
>> months I had unreadable prints and distortion and it turned out to be a
>> font misconfiguration issue.
>
> I can't
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 05:02:24PM +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 Jun 2016 17:46:39 Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 04:38:17PM +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > > Hello list,
> > >
> > > I have quite a few sites that firefox doesn't display properly. It seems
>
On Wed, 01 Jun 2016 17:02:24 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>> Do you use NoScript? If yes, does it allow webfonts?
>
> I should have said that the only extra I have is AdBlock Plus. Disabling it
> makes no difference. And your hint reminded me to install YesScript, which
> also makes no differen
On Wednesday 01 Jun 2016 18:13:10 Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 05:02:24PM +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Wednesday 01 Jun 2016 17:46:39 Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 04:38:17PM +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > > > Hello list,
> > > >
> > > > I
On 01/06/16 13:47, Giampiero Gabbiani wrote:
> In data martedì 31 maggio 2016 22:18:27, Bill Kenworthy ha scritto:
>> On 31/05/16 06:43, Giampiero Gabbiani wrote:
>>> In data martedì 31 maggio 2016 05:55:10, Bill Kenworthy ha scritto:
On 30/05/16 20:09, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Ma
On Wednesday 01 Jun 2016 16:31:30 Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Jun 2016 17:02:24 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> >> Do you use NoScript? If yes, does it allow webfonts?
> >
> > I should have said that the only extra I have is AdBlock Plus. Disabling
> > it makes no difference. And your hin
On 01/06/16 13:47, Giampiero Gabbiani wrote:
> In data martedì 31 maggio 2016 22:18:27, Bill Kenworthy ha scritto:
>> On 31/05/16 06:43, Giampiero Gabbiani wrote:
>>> In data martedì 31 maggio 2016 05:55:10, Bill Kenworthy ha scritto:
On 30/05/16 20:09, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Ma
Tuomo Hartikainen [16-06-01 17:05]:
> On 2016-06-01 04:09, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > due to bad luck in the past ;)
>
> What kind of bad luck? Please post specific errors.
>
> > What is the most reliable and promising way to compile KRITA and only
> > KRITA on Gentoo Linux
22 matches
Mail list logo
