> I keep getting a warning that Flash needs to be upgraded. I went to
> packages.g.o and there doesn't seem to be a newer version than what I
> have. What gives? I'd upgrade if there was one available but there
> isn't or I can't find it one. I found a bug report on the version I
> have instal
Am Donnerstag, 31. Dezember 2015, 00:15:33 schrieb Jeremi Piotrowski:
> This will lead to you having to enter the password
> twice - once when grub starts and once when the initramfs is setting up /.
If, and ONLY if, your /boot is inside your LUKS-encrypted volume, you can also
add a keyfile for
On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 7:27 AM, Dale wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I keep getting a warning that Flash needs to be upgraded. I went to
> packages.g.o and there doesn't seem to be a newer version than what I
> have. What gives? I'd upgrade if there was one available but there
> isn't or I can't find it
Hi,
currently I am experimenting with a new embedded system
(OrangePI PC). I want to suspend the system to RAM.
After a period of time the system should wakeup.
The RTC on the board seems to support alarms.
Is there a tool to set the alarm time of an RTC
from the commandline like hwclock set the
On Sunday 10 January 2016 12:25:41 Thomas Mueller wrote:
> Adobe Flash remains a bitter reality on mlb.com, nfl.com, wfpl.org, AT&T
> Uverse, among others.
... bbc.co.uk ...
--
Rgds
Peter
You can install pepperflash to chromium although it's proprietary. Google
Chrome has pepper flash by default
On Sun, Jan 10, 2016, 10:54 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Sunday 10 January 2016 12:25:41 Thomas Mueller wrote:
>
> > Adobe Flash remains a bitter reality on mlb.com, nfl.com, wfpl.org, AT&T
Michael Orlitzky gentoo.org> writes:
> Personally I would prefer a bug, but the proxy-maintainers page says
> that you should contact them directly. Either proxy-maint gentoo.org
> or on IRC in #gentoo-proxy-maint.
OK, I'll drop them an email.
> Here's the list I hacked together.
Thanks:: s
Hi All
I have installed app-arch/p7zip-15.09 and I am trying to create a 7-zip
archive which will run on MSWindows as an embedded executable. It seems that
only the standard console SFX module 7zCon.sfx has been installed, in
/usr/lib64/p7zip/7zCon.sfx and this is used by default:
===
On Sunday 10 Jan 2016 18:39:43 Ian Bloss wrote:
> You can install pepperflash to chromium although it's proprietary. Google
> Chrome has pepper flash by default
For Chromium you can install:
www-plugins/chrome-binary-plugins
--
Regards,
Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signe
http://pastebin.com/pWTx7yzg
If I use *COLLISION_IGNORE* = in make.conf then when building stage1 gcc.
GCC complains about missing stdio.h. I'm trying to compile a 64bit kernel
on a 32bit userland. I have tried cross_compile=powerpc64 duh? No powerpc64
gcc is installed. Also, -m64 fail when I put
On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 19:26:19 +
Mick wrote:
> On Sunday 10 Jan 2016 18:39:43 Ian Bloss wrote:
> > You can install pepperflash to chromium although it's proprietary.
> > Google Chrome has pepper flash by default
>
> For Chromium you can install:
>
> www-plugins/chrome-binary-plugins
For Fi
On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 02:55:57PM +0100, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote
> Hi,
>
> currently I am experimenting with a new embedded system
> (OrangePI PC). I want to suspend the system to RAM.
> After a period of time the system should wakeup.
>
> The RTC on the board seems to support alarms.
>
> Is
»Q« wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 19:26:19 +
> Mick wrote:
>
>> On Sunday 10 Jan 2016 18:39:43 Ian Bloss wrote:
>>> You can install pepperflash to chromium although it's proprietary.
>>> Google Chrome has pepper flash by default
>> For Chromium you can install:
>>
>> www-plugins/chrome-binary
On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 15:47:47 -0600
Dale wrote:
> Correct me if I'm wrong here. Isn't flash supposed to be dying
> anyway? Why are so many sites still using it if they should be using
> HTML5? Isn't HTML5 supposed to eliminate flash??
It's been *supposed* to be dying for years, and HTML5 video
»Q« wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 15:47:47 -0600
> Dale wrote:
>
>> Correct me if I'm wrong here. Isn't flash supposed to be dying
>> anyway? Why are so many sites still using it if they should be using
>> HTML5? Isn't HTML5 supposed to eliminate flash??
> It's been *supposed* to be dying for ye
waltd...@waltdnes.org [16-01-11 04:04]:
> On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 02:55:57PM +0100, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote
> > Hi,
> >
> > currently I am experimenting with a new embedded system
> > (OrangePI PC). I want to suspend the system to RAM.
> > After a period of time the system should wakeup.
> >
>
Hello,
I'm trying to find the old sourcefile (the file that would be downloaded
to /usr/portage/distfiles/ ) for app-admin/showconsole. It is an old
remnant not of much use to most, but I need/want to look at the sources.
The last ebuilds show::
HOMEPAGE="http://www.novell.com/linux/suse/";
or
James wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to find the old sourcefile (the file that would be downloaded
> to /usr/portage/distfiles/ ) for app-admin/showconsole. It is an old
> remnant not of much use to most, but I need/want to look at the sources.
>
>
> The last ebuilds show::
>
> HOMEPAGE="http://www
On Sunday 10 Jan 2016 16:50:58 »Q« wrote:
> AFAIK, with all major browsers supporting HTML5 video, the only reason
> so many sites still require Flash is that it costs money to transition.
With websites usually redesigned every 3-5 years we should hopefully see the
majority of sites moving off fl
Neil Bothwick writes:
> On Fri, 08 Jan 2016 21:37:55 +0100, lee wrote:
>
>> > What about things like flash plugins? Those are often wanted on
>> > desktops and need multilib.
>>
>> Flash sucks, and fortunately, it's dead.
>
> It should be, but it's not. There are still many sites that require
20 matches
Mail list logo
