On Sat, 02 Jan 2016 12:47:49 +, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> I use systemd's version of gummiboot with /boot on the ESP. Everything
> else is on a single btrfs filesystem, on a luks-encrypted partition and
> dracut takes care of everything. I don't have my laptop with me, but
> I'll post the dracut
On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 22:34:24 -0600, Jc García wrote:
> > I serve the binpkg host from my
> > desktop to my LAN with nginx but I'm considering git from the booted
> > container
> Correction:
> * I'm considering doing it from the booted container
Why not just use a shared NFS directory?
--
Neil
On Saturday 02 January 2016 12:45:09 Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 01:23:28PM +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > > > you see here. And the qt5 screen shot is half as big again as the
> > > > qt4.
> > >
> > > I don't quite get that.
> >
> > ??
>
> Both images are the same size
On Sunday 03 January 2016 11:08:32 I wrote:
> On Saturday 02 January 2016 12:45:09 Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 01:23:28PM +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > > > > you see here. And the qt5 screen shot is half as big again as the
> > > > > qt4.
> > > >
> > > > I don't quite
On Sunday 03 Jan 2016 11:44:37 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Sunday 03 January 2016 11:08:32 I wrote:
> > On Saturday 02 January 2016 12:45:09 Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 01:23:28PM +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > > > > > you see here. And the qt5 screen shot is half as bi
On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 23:09:27 +0200
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have quite a few large audio rip files that need to be split up into
> their respective tracks. They were wrongly ripped back when and the
> original CDs aren't available anymore.
>
> I very seldom work with audio files dire
On Saturday 02 January 2016 15:06:37 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> "half as big again" means "50% larger than".
That is, take the original measure, add one-half of it again and you have
1.5 x the original.
> i.e. calculate 50% and add it, making the total 150%.
> It's an English idiom, so don;t try to
On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 11:44:37 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > I meant the size of the file.
>
> And now I want to add that using 1.5 x the space to represent far less
> information is a clear indicator of inefficiency.
Efficiency is not everything, readability is often more important.
Otherwi
On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 11:08:32 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Welcome to Pedants Anonymous :)
Come on Peter, pedants are anything but anonymous.
We^H^HThey like to nit-pick from the rooftops :)
--
Neil Bothwick
Veni, vermini, vomui
I came, I got ratted, I threw up
pgpPk8KFTpIWc.pgp
Descripti
GLSA 201512-07 requires that I remove gstreamer-0.10 but I'm finding
it rather inextricable due to dependencies. Has anyone else run into
this problem?
- Grant
On 01/02/2016 12:38 AM, Håkon Alstadheim wrote:
> Den 01. jan. 2016 00:49, skrev Linux:
>> On 12/30/2015 10:32 AM, Roman Dobosz wrote:
>>
>> snip
> Should be as easy as hitting Ctrl-L when your screen is messed up,
> should it not? Don't use MC, so haven't tried it. If it does not work,
> look
Op zondag 3 januari 2016 07:52:30 schreef Grant:
> GLSA 201512-07 requires that I remove gstreamer-0.10 but I'm finding
> it rather inextricable due to dependencies. Has anyone else run into
> this problem?
>
> - Grant
>
Yes, same here. I arrived to the same conclusion, and decided to just leav
On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 07:52:30 -0800, Grant wrote:
> GLSA 201512-07 requires that I remove gstreamer-0.10 but I'm finding
> it rather inextricable due to dependencies. Has anyone else run into
> this problem?
I think this is another case of glsa-check not handling slots correctly.
--
Neil Bothwi
On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 07:52:30 -0800, Grant wrote:
>
>> GLSA 201512-07 requires that I remove gstreamer-0.10 but I'm finding
>> it rather inextricable due to dependencies. Has anyone else run into
>> this problem?
>
> I think this is another ca
Neil Bothwick [16-01-02 11:53]:
> On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 06:50:22 +0100, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
>
> > I am not using a physical printer.
> >
> > Is it possible to get completly rid of cups and
> > other "physical printing"-related stuff somehow?
>
> You stipulate physical printing. Does that
On Sunday 03 January 2016 14:49:10 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 11:44:37 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > > I meant the size of the file.
> >
> > And now I want to add that using 1.5 x the space to represent far less
> > information is a clear indicator of inefficiency.
>
> Efficien
Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Saturday 02 January 2016 15:06:37 Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
>> "half as big again" means "50% larger than".
> That is, take the original measure, add one-half of it again and you have
> 1.5 x the original.
>
>> i.e. calculate 50% and add it, making the total 150%.
>> It's a
Okay, this is the list after the SECOND emptytree world.
I then sync'd again and removed any packages scheduled for update from
this list and ran it again.
Most of these are long-standing fails, the one that worries me the most
is klibc, that might byte me on reboot. That is a Gcc 5.3 incompatibi
On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 15:24:35 -0600, Dale wrote:
> I might add, this is why when I read a email, I try to put the most
> positive light on it. Sometimes even a native English speaker just
> doesn't quite get the right thing to come out. Add in spelling errors
> and such or someone speaking English
On Sunday 03 January 2016 23:50:29 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> I cannot work out the correct plural of initramfs!
That's easy - it's initramfses. Well, it would be if there were any such
word as initramfs. :)
--
Rgds
Peter
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 15:24:35 -0600, Dale wrote:
>
>> I might add, this is why when I read a email, I try to put the most
>> positive light on it. Sometimes even a native English speaker just
>> doesn't quite get the right thing to come out. Add in spelling errors
>> and such
On Mon, 04 Jan 2016 00:08:21 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > I cannot work out the correct plural of initramfs!
>
> That's easy - it's initramfses. Well, it would be if there were any
> such word as initramfs. :)
Of course there is such a word, you just used it ;-)
--
Neil Bothwick
Someon
On Sunday 03 January 2016 19:10:36 Dale wrote:
> Yea, I got tired of trying to figure out what was called what. The word
> thingy hit me and I use it for the init thingys, thingies, and a few
> other things now. Just don't get me started on hal again. That thingy
> still pisses me off. I need
23 matches
Mail list logo
