Rich Freeman wrote:
>
> Sure, but the portage team can really only dictate the upstream
> defaults of portage, not tree policy.
As I understand, they intend to remove non-dynamic deps
(if they agreed to not implement it properly for sub-slots,
this makes sense).
So we are not speaking about defa
On Sunday 27 September 2015 12:36:27 Mick wrote:
> Contributing is more involved than simply downloading a profile. I think
> you have to use the TaxiDB API:
>
> http://sourceforge.net/p/openicc/taxi/ci/master/tree/docs/api_doc.txt
Hm. I see what you mean.
> I you are interested then you can c
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 3:57 AM, Martin Vaeth wrote:
> Rich Freeman wrote:
>>
>> Sure, but the portage team can really only dictate the upstream
>> defaults of portage, not tree policy.
>
> As I understand, they intend to remove non-dynamic deps
> (if they agreed to not implement it properly for
--Original Message--
From: Michael Orlitzky
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
ReplyTo: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] dynamic deps, wtf are they ex
when I run htop I see a process that takes about 85% of the CPU:
Why is it taking so much CUP?
/usr/bin/X -nolisten tcp -br -deferglyphs 16 vt07 -auth /var/run/slim.auth
Yes, I use slim to login.
--
Thelma
Alan McKinnon writes:
> On 27/09/2015 21:17, lee wrote:
>
>
>
> [big snip]
>
>>> Seems to me you are thinking like a human (because you are one) and not
>>> > seeing portage's limits. Portage has no idea what would solve the issue
>>> > so can't give any recommendations worth a damn. The best it
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 12:52:41AM +0200, lee wrote:
>
> Alan McKinnon writes:
>
> > On 27/09/2015 21:17, lee wrote:
> >
> > Fellow, I'm done with you, really.
> >
> > You hold onto your issues with portage like they were some treasured
> > memory of a long-since departed loved one, while all the
On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 00:52:41 +0200, lee wrote:
> > You hold onto your issues with portage like they were some treasured
> > memory of a long-since departed loved one, while all the time
> > apparently ignoring the correct valid solutions offeered by kind
> > folks on this list.
> >
> > Let it go.
8 matches
Mail list logo