On Tuesday, September 15, 2015 3:11:37 AM james wrote:
> Fernando Rodriguez outlook.com> writes:
>
> > Do you know of any plans to enable offloading on the gentoo toolchain?
>
> NO, but I'm sure some devs are keenly aware of this feature in gcc-5.
>
>
> > I was able to build the offloading com
On Monday 14 September 2015 21:41:54 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 15:56:25 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > When I ran "emaint all" just now I got "has outdated metadata" against
> > five KDE packages. Does anyone here know what that implies? Google
> > didn't help.
>
> It's not a re
Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Monday 14 September 2015 11:28:36 Marc Joliet wrote:
>
>> Just for the record, but I think emaint (part of portage) should be capable
>> of fixing this automatically (specifically, it's "merges" command). It can
>> do a couple more things, so check it out anyway. (Also,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 15/09/15 18:50, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Actually, the man page doesn't mention -f; you have to run emaint
> --help to find it. This is the first such case I've come across.
Sounds bug(zilla)-worthy ;)
- --
wraeth
GnuPG Key: B2D9F759
-BEGIN
On 15.09.2015 08:49, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> I will retry a build and show you parts of the log.
Something in my merging history seems to have solved it now.
Merged OK today, sorry for the noise.
[I] app-office/libreoffice
Available versions: 4.4.4.3 4.4.5.2 **4.4. (~)5.0.1.2
**5
On 15 September 2015 09:50:08 BST, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Monday 14 September 2015 21:41:54 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 15:56:25 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > > When I ran "emaint all" just now I got "has outdated metadata"
> against
> > > five KDE packages. Does anyone her
On Tuesday 15 September 2015 04:05:16 Dale wrote:
> Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Monday 14 September 2015 11:28:36 Marc Joliet wrote:
> >> Just for the record, but I think emaint (part of portage) should be
> >> capable
> >> of fixing this automatically (specifically, it's "merges" command). It
>
On Tuesday 15 September 2015 10:30:39 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On 15 September 2015 09:50:08 BST, Peter Humphrey
wrote:
> > On Monday 14 September 2015 21:41:54 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > > On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 15:56:25 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > > > When I ran "emaint all" just now I got "has o
In most X11 apps I can select some text and then paste it somewhere
else with a middle-click, or dump it to stdout with the command 'xclip
-o'. That doesn't work for highligted text in gtk-3 apps (meld,
evince, audacious, etc.). After selecting text in a gtk-3 app, if I
middle-click in a terminal
Fernando Rodriguez outlook.com> writes:
> > > Do you know of any plans to enable offloading on the gentoo toolchain?
> > > I was able to build the offloading compiler using crossdev with a few
hacks
> The link was for the emulator ebuild[1]. I got distracted with other
> stuff and didn't mak
Grant Edwards wrote:
> In most X11 apps I can select some text and then paste it somewhere
> else with a middle-click, or dump it to stdout with the command 'xclip
> -o'. That doesn't work for highligted text in gtk-3 apps (meld,
> evince, audacious, etc.). After selecting text in a gtk-3 app,
On 2015-09-15, Grant Edwards wrote:
> In most X11 apps I can select some text and then paste it somewhere
> else with a middle-click, or dump it to stdout with the command 'xclip
> -o'. That doesn't work for highligted text in gtk-3 apps (meld,
> evince, audacious, etc.). After selecting text i
sys-concept.com> writes:
> Lately I've installed Fedora core on my old eeepc and I very impressed
> with the printer installation. Fedora automatically recognized my
> Brother HL-5730 printer and installed printer driver for it.
I have a brother J6710-DW printer that I have tried, unsuccessf
On 09/15/2015 01:47 PM, james wrote:
> sys-concept.com> writes:
>
>
>
>> Lately I've installed Fedora core on my old eeepc and I very impressed
>> with the printer installation. Fedora automatically recognized my
>> Brother HL-5730 printer and installed printer driver for it.
>
> I have a br
On 15/09/2015 21:53, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> On 09/15/2015 01:47 PM, james wrote:
>> sys-concept.com> writes:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Lately I've installed Fedora core on my old eeepc and I very impressed
>>> with the printer installation. Fedora automatically recognized my
>>> Brother HL-5730 prin
Hello,
So looking at /etc/portage/repos.conf, it seems root.root owns these
files; shouldn't it be portage.portage? and /usr/portage
That got me thinking. Everywhere that portage operates or owns
things, should the ownership not be portage.portage
and what would the typical permissions be?
Is th
james wrote:
> Hello,
>
> So looking at /etc/portage/repos.conf, it seems root.root owns these
> files; shouldn't it be portage.portage? and /usr/portage
On my system /etc/portage/repos.conf is also owned by root:root
> That got me thinking. Everywhere that portage operates or owns
> things,
On 15/09/2015 22:09, james wrote:
> Hello,
>
> So looking at /etc/portage/repos.conf, it seems root.root owns these
> files; shouldn't it be portage.portage? and /usr/portage
>
> That got me thinking. Everywhere that portage operates or owns
> things, should the ownership not be portage.portage
>
On Tuesday, September 15, 2015 10:25:15 PM Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 15/09/2015 22:09, james wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > So looking at /etc/portage/repos.conf, it seems root.root owns these
> > files; shouldn't it be portage.portage? and /usr/portage
> >
> > That got me thinking. Everywhere that po
On 09/15/2015 01:58 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 15/09/2015 21:53, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
[snip]
>
>>> Yea, I almost had mine working but I just got tired of hacking
>>> away at it. It would be more straightforward to take an rpm or deb
>>> package and use it. Folks have made specific model
Fernando Rodriguez outlook.com> writes:
> > Here, all of /etc/portage is root:root
This is what I have except for distfiles::
drwxrwxr-x5 root portage 232K Sep 14 23:00 distfiles
root.portage ??? I guess portage does that. Fernando's explaination
seem plausible, I guess I'd have to look a
On 16/09/2015 00:36, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 15, 2015 10:25:15 PM Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> On 15/09/2015 22:09, james wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> So looking at /etc/portage/repos.conf, it seems root.root owns these
>>> files; shouldn't it be portage.portage? and /usr/portage
On 16/09/2015 04:19, james wrote:
> Fernando Rodriguez outlook.com> writes:
>
>
>>> Here, all of /etc/portage is root:root
>
> This is what I have except for distfiles::
> drwxrwxr-x5 root portage 232K Sep 14 23:00 distfiles
>
> root.portage ??? I guess portage does that. Fernando's expla
On 16/09/2015 00:49, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> On 09/15/2015 01:58 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> On 15/09/2015 21:53, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> [snip]
>>
Yea, I almost had mine working but I just got tired of hacking
away at it. It would be more straightforward to take an rpm or
24 matches
Mail list logo
