On Friday, April 24, 2015 03:38:53 PM james wrote:
> J. Roeleveld antarean.org> writes:
> > This is one of the reasons why I have given up on genkernel and dracut for
> > initramfs creation and now simply build my own and have it integrated
> > into the kernel:
> > $ zcat /proc/config.gz | grep
Are we meant to create the above file manually?
This box is running sys-apps/portage-2.2.18 but I was surprised to see that it
doesn't have a gentoo.conf file.
--
Regards,
Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Mick wrote:
> Are we meant to create the above file manually?
>
> This box is running sys-apps/portage-2.2.18 but I was surprised to see
that it
> doesn't have a gentoo.conf file.
>
I use the latest, excluding version, of portage and I have it
here. I didn't create it so I assume it was inst
On Friday, April 24, 2015 10:23:01 PM lee wrote:
> "J. Roeleveld" writes:
> > On Thursday, April 23, 2015 11:03:53 PM lee wrote:
> > Do you have anything that you find insufficiently documented or is too
> > difficult?
> sure, lots
Have you contacted the Xen project with this?
> > Containers.
>
On Saturday 25 Apr 2015 11:00:18 Dale wrote:
> Mick wrote:
> > Are we meant to create the above file manually?
> >
> > This box is running sys-apps/portage-2.2.18 but I was surprised to see
>
> that it
>
> > doesn't have a gentoo.conf file.
>
> I use the latest, excluding version, of porta
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 12:10 AM, wrote:
> Well, now that I have put abi_x86_32 in make.conf and did those 80
> packages and fixed the preserved_libs, in my next update it wants to do
> 199 reinstalls to get every possible package which has that flag -- do I
> need all that or should I go back to
Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 12:10 AM, wrote:
> > Well, now that I have put abi_x86_32 in make.conf and did those 80
> > packages and fixed the preserved_libs, in my next update it wants to do
> > 199 reinstalls to get every possible package which has that flag -- do I
> > need
On Friday, April 24, 2015 10:24:06 PM lee wrote:
> "J. Roeleveld" writes:
> > On Thursday, April 23, 2015 11:02:24 PM lee wrote:
> >> hydra writes:
> >> > You mean the documentation at Gentoo about Xen sucks or the upstream
> >> >
> >> > documentation? What information are you missing from ther
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Mick wrote:
> On Saturday 25 Apr 2015 11:00:18 Dale wrote:
> > Mick wrote:
> > > Are we meant to create the above file manually?
> > >
> > > This box is running sys-apps/portage-2.2.18 but I was surprised to see
> >
> > that it
> >
> > > doesn't have a gentoo.conf
On Sat, 25 Apr 2015 06:45:16 -0400, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> > The only thing you gain is being able to run 32-bit applications
> > against those libraries, even if you don't have any need to. The only
> > thing you lose is a bunch of inodes, and maybe some compile time.
>
> Well, that c
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Apr 2015 06:45:16 -0400, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
>
> > > The only thing you gain is being able to run 32-bit applications
> > > against those libraries, even if you don't have any need to. The only
> > > thing you lose is a bunch of inodes, and maybe some
On Saturday 25 Apr 2015 12:58:39 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Mick wrote:
> > I recall reading "New portage plug-in sync system" in eselect news, but
> > it doesn't mention creating such files manually:
> >
> > "Migration:
> > Edit /etc/portage/repos.conf/*.con
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Mick wrote:
> On Saturday 25 Apr 2015 12:58:39 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Mick wrote:
>
> > > I recall reading "New portage plug-in sync system" in eselect news, but
> > > it doesn't mention creating such files manually:
> > >
>
On Saturday 25 Apr 2015 14:07:38 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Mick wrote:
> > On Saturday 25 Apr 2015 12:58:39 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> > > On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Mick wrote:
> > > > I recall reading "New portage plug-in sync system" in eselect news,
> >
Hi,
A novice asks the master Emerge:
"Is there Zen also in every upgrade, which will serve to Gentoo?"
Master Emerge moved a little bit and spoke:
WARNING: One or more updates/rebuilds have been skipped due to a dependency
conflict:
x11-libs/libXfont:0
(x11-libs/libXfont-1.5.1:0/0::gentoo,
On 21/04/15 20:09, james wrote:
[installing gcc 5 system-wide through portage]
Now that 5.1 is in Portage (masked), you should keep in mind that
emerging it will result in the 5.1 libraries being used, even if you
keep 4.9 (or 4.8) as the default compiler.
This is not really guaranteed to
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 6:49 PM, Mick wrote:
> On Saturday 25 Apr 2015 14:07:38 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Mick wrote:
> > > On Saturday 25 Apr 2015 12:58:39 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Mick
> wrote:
> > > > > I recall rea
I've on my system "qpdfview" (without qt*) but the system wants to upgrade to
qpdfview-0.4.13-r1
and it is asking for qt4 or qt5
-
!!! The ebuild selected to satisfy "app-text/qpdfview" has unmet requirements.
- app-text/qpdfview-0.4.13-r1::gentoo USE="cups dbus pdf svg -djvu (-fitz) -pos
On Sat, 25 Apr 2015 16:49:37 +0100
Mick wrote:
> On Saturday 25 Apr 2015 14:07:38 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> > [1] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Portage/Sync
> >
> > The 'Migration' section states that:
> > If /etc/portage/repos.conf does not exist:
> > root # mkdir /etc/portage/repos.co
On 25/04/15 19:54, Joseph wrote:
I've on my system "qpdfview" (without qt*) but the system wants to
upgrade to qpdfview-0.4.13-r1
and it is asking for qt4 or qt5
[...]
Why?
Because it can now be build using Qt4 or Qt5. You have to choose one.
If you're on KDE4, enable the qt4 USE flag (otherwi
On 04/25/2015 09:07 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A novice asks the master Emerge:
> "Is there Zen also in every upgrade, which will serve to Gentoo?"
>
> Master Emerge moved a little bit and spoke:
>
> WARNING: One or more updates/rebuilds have been skipped due to a dependency
> con
I read about this vulnerability in the
2015-04-06-apache-addhandler-addtype Gentoo news item. I don't think
I'm using any functionality that could expose me to the problem but
I'd like to be able to say so for sure. Does the fact that I'm
up-to-date with GLSAs, I don't have PHP5 in APACHE2_OPTS (
»Q« gmx.net> writes:
> On my amd64 laptop, on resume from hibernation, wicd almost always
> fails to restart. This problem goes back to when I set up the machine,
> over a year ago, but it seems to have gotten a lot worse in the last
> month or so.
Shot in the dark: Check (and google for issu
On Saturday, April 25, 2015 10:54:03 AM Joseph wrote:
> I've on my system "qpdfview" (without qt*) but the system wants to upgrade
to qpdfview-0.4.13-r1
> and it is asking for qt4 or qt5
> -
> !!! The ebuild selected to satisfy "app-text/qpdfview" has unmet
requirements.
> - app-text/qpdf
On 04/25/15 20:43, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 25/04/15 19:54, Joseph wrote:
I've on my system "qpdfview" (without qt*) but the system wants to
upgrade to qpdfview-0.4.13-r1
and it is asking for qt4 or qt5
[...]
Why?
Because it can now be build using Qt4 or Qt5. You have to choose one.
If you
I'm ready to swear on a stack of Knuth volumes that gdb has lost its mind.
But, I'm willing to consider the remote possibility that I don't know how
to use gdb ;) (Because I really don't.)
This is my annotated copy/paste from a single gdb session:
#gdb /bin/mount
GNU gdb (Gentoo 7.9 vanilla) 7
walt wrote:
> I'm ready to swear on a stack of Knuth volumes that gdb has lost its mind.
>
> But, I'm willing to consider the remote possibility that I don't know how
> to use gdb ;) (Because I really don't.)
>
> This is my annotated copy/paste from a single gdb session:
>
> #gdb /bin/mount
Nikos Chantziaras gmail.com> writes:
> On 21/04/15 20:09, james wrote:
> > [installing gcc 5 system-wide through portage]
This is not my intention, system wide...
> Now that 5.1 is in Portage (masked), you should keep in mind that
> emerging it will result in the 5.1 libraries being used, ev
On 04/25/2015 05:23 PM, Grant wrote:
> I read about this vulnerability in the
> 2015-04-06-apache-addhandler-addtype Gentoo news item. I don't think
> I'm using any functionality that could expose me to the problem but
> I'd like to be able to say so for sure. Does the fact that I'm
> up-to-date
Daniel Frey [15-04-26 03:12]:
> On 04/25/2015 09:07 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > A novice asks the master Emerge:
> > "Is there Zen also in every upgrade, which will serve to Gentoo?"
> >
> > Master Emerge moved a little bit and spoke:
> >
> > WARNING: One or more updates/rebu
On Saturday, April 25, 2015 7:42:30 PM cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> > (gdb) list mount.c:123
> > 118 else
> > 119 fputc(*p, stdout);
> > 120 }
> > 121 }
> > 122
> > 123 static void print_all(struct libmnt_context *cxt, char *pattern, int
show_labe
On 26/04/15 01:46, Joseph wrote:
On 04/25/15 20:43, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 25/04/15 19:54, Joseph wrote:
I've on my system "qpdfview" (without qt*) but the system wants to
upgrade to qpdfview-0.4.13-r1
and it is asking for qt4 or qt5
[...]
Why?
Because it can now be build using Qt4 or Qt
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> A novice asks the master Emerge:
> "Is there Zen also in every upgrade, which will serve to Gentoo?"
Did the novice ask the correct question about the life, the world,
and everything? Your mantra should be
emerge -NaDu @world
(--with-bdeps=y in EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS in
33 matches
Mail list logo
