On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 01:41:19 -0600
Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 11:11 PM, German wrote:
> >
> > Out of curiosity I looked into my /boot partition and found two .efi
> files. One is /boot/efi/gummiboot/gummibootx64.efi and another is
> /boot/efi/boot/bootx64.efi. I remember
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 2:03 AM, German wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 01:41:19 -0600
> Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 11:11 PM, German wrote:
> > >
> > > Out of curiosity I looked into my /boot partition and found two .efi
> > files. One is /boot/efi/gummiboot/gummibootx6
On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 02:10:33 -0600
Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 2:03 AM, German wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 01:41:19 -0600
> > Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 11:11 PM, German wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Out of curiosity I looked into my /boot
On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 02:10:33 -0600
Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 2:03 AM, German wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 01:41:19 -0600
> > Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 11:11 PM, German wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Out of curiosity I looked into my /boot
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 2:18 AM, German wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 02:10:33 -0600
> Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 2:03 AM, German wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 01:41:19 -0600
> > > Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 11:11 PM, Germ
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 2:27 AM, German wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 02:10:33 -0600
> Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 2:03 AM, German wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 01:41:19 -0600
> > > Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 11:11 PM, Germ
On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 02:31:27 -0600
Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 2:27 AM, German wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 02:10:33 -0600
> > Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 2:03 AM, German wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 01:41:19 -0600
> > >
On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 08:36:42AM -0800, Daniel Frey wrote
> I got my HDHomerun tuner around then too, but I decided back then
> (without reading the manual) that I didn't want it on my "main" NIC, so
> I bought an Intel pci-e NIC and dedicated the Homerun to it.
>
> Every once in a while I move
On 2/14/2015 6:37 AM, bitlord wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 13:13:25 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
>> 'perl-cleaner --all' generated the following output.
>>
>> * Finding left over modules and header
>>
>> * The following files remain. These were either installed by hand
>> * or edited. This script c
On Mon, 02 Mar 2015 08:14:41 -0500
Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2/14/2015 6:37 AM, bitlord wrote:
> > On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 13:13:25 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> >> 'perl-cleaner --all' generated the following output.
> >>
> >> * Finding left over modules and header
> >>
> >> * The following files remain
On 3/2/2015 9:25 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Mar 2015 08:14:41 -0500
> Tanstaafl wrote:
>
>> On 2/14/2015 6:37 AM, bitlord wrote:
>>> On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 13:13:25 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
'perl-cleaner --all' generated the following output.
* Finding left over modules
Hi all,
Googling on a minor issue with perl-cleaner after the 5.20 upgrade, I
ran across this post:
On 2/14/2015 7:39 AM, Mick wrote:
> Yes, you shouldn't really have any libs in your world file. Any
> required would be pulled in as dependencies.
Is this in fact true?
I checked mine, and foun
2015-03-02 8:29 GMT-06:00 Tanstaafl :
> So, should I delete all of these? Even glib and glibc?
>
Ideally you only want the applications you actually use directly in
your world file, and let portage solve the dependencies for those. If
you really need to emerge a library installed by hand use 'eme
On Monday 02 March 2015 09:29:15 Tanstaafl wrote:
> Googling on a minor issue with perl-cleaner after the 5.20 upgrade, I
> ran across this post:
>
> On 2/14/2015 7:39 AM, Mick wrote:
> > Yes, you shouldn't really have any libs in your world file. Any
> > required would be pulled in as dependenci
On Mon, 02 Mar 2015 09:29:15 -0500, Tanstaafl wrote:
> > Yes, you shouldn't really have any libs in your world file. Any
> > required would be pulled in as dependencies.
>
> Is this in fact true?
Yes. The world file is for the software you want installed. Portage will
take care of its dependenc
On Mon, 02 Mar 2015 09:29:15 -0500
Tanstaafl wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Googling on a minor issue with perl-cleaner after the 5.20 upgrade, I
> ran across this post:
>
> On 2/14/2015 7:39 AM, Mick wrote:
> > Yes, you shouldn't really have any libs in your world file. Any
> > required would be pulle
On Mon, 02 Mar 2015 14:47:28 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> It could be that all those libs have found their way into world by
> accident, presumably by you forgetting to include -1 when updating them.
Most likely. Another way of overfilling world is by installing aoftware
to try it out than for
On Mon, 02 Mar 2015 10:05:16 -0500, Tanstaafl wrote:
You've been on the list long enough to know how well top-posting is
received.
> Many thanks to all for the responses, will work on cleaning this up next
> weekend (don't like doing things like this on a production server during
> the week)...
On Mon, 02 Mar 2015 09:26:34 -0500
Tanstaafl wrote:
> > In this specific case, all except two files come from emul-linux 32
> > bit and they are all safe to delete (even the two except ones). But
> > do note I know this becuase I've been here before and figured it
> > out, not becuase of some mag
On 3/2/2015 10:11 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Mar 2015 10:05:16 -0500, Tanstaafl wrote:
>
> You've been on the list long enough to know how well top-posting is
> received.
Yes, and you've been around the internet long enough to know that there
are always exceptoions to the rules.
Send
Many thanks to all for the responses, will work on cleaning this up next
weekend (don't like doing things like this on a production server during
the week)...
On 3/2/2015 9:53 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Mar 2015 09:29:15 -0500, Tanstaafl wrote:
>
>>> Yes, you shouldn't really have any
Hello,
this is not a Gentoo problem per se, but i'm getting it under Gentoo.
Runninng KDE + Networkmanager (net-misc/networkmanager-0.9.10.1_pre20141101)
together with vpnc plugin (net-misc/networkmanager-vpnc-0.9.10.0).
I have set up a VPN connection to a AVM FritzBox (which is using - as far
http://archives.gentoo.org/lists
Thankyou, Thankyou, Thankyou!
James
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 2:00 AM, Fernando Rodriguez
wrote:
> On Saturday, February 28, 2015 12:50:37 PM Tom H wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 5:47 PM, Fernando Rodriguez
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Efibootmgr is not a boot manager, it's an utility to interface with the EFI
>>> firmware on the motherboard
On Monday 02 Mar 2015 18:07:45 Petric Frank wrote:
> Hello,
>
> this is not a Gentoo problem per se, but i'm getting it under Gentoo.
>
> Runninng KDE + Networkmanager
> (net-misc/networkmanager-0.9.10.1_pre20141101) together with vpnc plugin
> (net-misc/networkmanager-vpnc-0.9.10.0).
>
> I have
Hello,
Am Montag, 2. März 2015, 21:01:48 schrieb Mick:
> On Monday 02 Mar 2015 18:07:45 Petric Frank wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > this is not a Gentoo problem per se, but i'm getting it under Gentoo.
> >
> > Runninng KDE + Networkmanager
> > (net-misc/networkmanager-0.9.10.1_pre20141101) together w
On Monday 02 Mar 2015 22:13:05 Petric Frank wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Am Montag, 2. März 2015, 21:01:48 schrieb Mick:
> The homepage on vpnc in chapter TODO tells:
> "phase2-rekeying is now supported as of svn revision 126!"
>
> Changelog states for 0.5.2:
> "Fix Phase 2 rekeying, by various autho
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am Montag, 2. März 2015, 15:29:15 schrieb Tanstaafl:
> Hi all,
>
> Googling on a minor issue with perl-cleaner after the 5.20 upgrade, I
> ran across this post:
>
> On 2/14/2015 7:39 AM, Mick wrote:
> > Yes, you shouldn't really have any libs in y
On Mon, 02 Mar 2015 10:14:54 -0500, Tanstaafl wrote:
> > You've been on the list long enough to know how well top-posting is
> > received.
>
> Yes, and you've been around the internet long enough to know that there
> are always exceptoions to the rules.
>
> Sending a general 'Thanks', without
On Mon, 2 March 2015, at 1:36 am, Fernando Rodriguez
wrote:
>> ...
>> Don't forget to file a bug so we can track your issue.
>
> Should I file one with gentoo even if it's an upstream bug?
Yes.
Usually what I do in this case is go to the upstream mailing list, and see if I
get any quick ans
150303 Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> If you look at your world file, you should for each line
> be able to immediately say "yes I know what this is and I need it".
> Where "I need it" means "I need it directly"
> and *not* "I need it because some other package needs it".
> In most cases this means t
Now when my system is finally booted, I would like someone walk me through the
kernel config menu ( I couldn't locate the modules during install).
Aformentioned modules are in the subject line.
Is syntax in /etc/conf.d/modules valid? Just want to make sure.
modules_2_6="3c59x"
And finally, I'd
On Tuesday 03 Mar 2015 04:48:11 German wrote:
> Now when my system is finally booted, I would like someone walk me through
> the kernel config menu ( I couldn't locate the modules during install).
> Aformentioned modules are in the subject line.
>
> Is syntax in /etc/conf.d/modules valid? Just wan
33 matches
Mail list logo
