On 01/19/2015 05:07 PM, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote:
Just ran it; it downloads
http://gpo.zugaina.org/eix_cache/eix-cache.tbz2. It terminated with an
error while writing the database file, something related to overlays not
existing or something. The help page (run eix-remote with no command)
tells me
Bill Kenworthy iinet.net.au> writes:
> > The main thing keeping me away from CephFS is that it has no mechanism
> > for resolving silent corruption. Btrfs underneath it would obviously
> > help, though not for failure modes that involve CephFS itself. I'd
> > feel a lot better if CephFS had so
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 10:07 AM, James wrote:
> Bill Kenworthy iinet.net.au> writes:
>
>> You can turn off COW and go single on btrfs to speed it up but bugs in
>> ceph and btrfs lose data real fast!
>
> Interesting idea, since I'll have raid1 underneath each node. I'll need to
> dig into this i
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Urs Schütz wrote:
>
> I changed /etc/hosts as Mick/Michael pointed out in an other reply, and this
> solved the slow response. Here the relevant part of the corrected, working
> /etc/hosts:
>
> # IPv4 and IPv6 localhost aliases
> 127.0.0.1cadd.homeLAN localhost
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 1:03 PM, James wrote:
> I think the fundamental flaw with systemd is the fact that the duality
> of support for systemd and other init solutions is so quickly abondoned.
> If they were allowed (encouraged) to run side by side for a few years,
> let folks decide then; as i
Rich Freeman gentoo.org> writes:
> >> You can turn off COW and go single on btrfs to speed it up but bugs in
> >> ceph and btrfs lose data real fast!
> So, btrfs and ceph solve an overlapping set of problems in an
> overlapping set of ways. In general adding data security often comes
> at the
Howdy,
This is concerning a hard drive I had issues with a while back. I been
using it to do backups with as a test if nothing else. Anyway, it seems
to have issues once again.
root@fireball / # smartctl -l selftest /dev/sdd
smartctl 6.3 2014-07-26 r3976 [x86_64-linux-3.16.3-gentoo] (local bui
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 12:27 PM, James wrote:
>
> Raid 1 with btrfs can not only protect the ceph fs files but the gentoo
> node installation itself.
Agree 100%. Like I said, the right solution depends on your situation.
If you're using the server doing ceph storage only for file serving,
then
Zitat von Tom H :
Lennart claims that the embedded world loves systemd. I suspect that,
as in other corners of the Linux world, there are lovers and haters of
systemd.
Embedded systems also quite often means low on resources, CPU power,
memory, space.
If you are using hard space constraine
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Marc Stürmer wrote:
> Zitat von Tom H :
>
>> Lennart claims that the embedded world loves systemd. I suspect that,
>> as in other corners of the Linux world, there are lovers and haters of
>> systemd.
>
>
> Embedded systems also quite often means low on resources,
On 01/20/2015 09:58 AM, Dale wrote:
> 1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x000f 116 099 006Pre-fail
> Always - 114620384
> 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 053 051 036Pre-fail
> Always - 62752
> 197 Current_Pending_Sector 0x0012 088 088 000Old_age
On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 18:03:44 + (UTC) James wrote:
> Interestingly, Bircoph has solve many of the problems that seem to be in my
> path of discovery.
If you have any questions about particular issues, we may discuss
them. Out of my memory for all setups we use nothing really special
— standard
On 21/01/15 00:03, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 10:07 AM, James wrote:
>> Bill Kenworthy iinet.net.au> writes:
>>
>>> You can turn off COW and go single on btrfs to speed it up but bugs in
>>> ceph and btrfs lose data real fast!
>>
>> Interesting idea, since I'll have raid1 under
I've tried to setup some stocks in GnuCash but it does not list TSX
What alternatives are to keep track of stocks under Linux.
--
Joseph
14 matches
Mail list logo
