Re: [gentoo-user] Choosing a new profile: multilib or not?

2014-12-23 Thread Mick
On Tuesday 23 Dec 2014 03:44:30 Andrew Savchenko wrote: > On Mon, 22 Dec 2014 10:53:06 + Mick wrote: > > It used to be the case that adobe flash and other applications would not > > work with a no-multilib profile. > > > > However, I was surprised to see that a previous no-multilib installatio

[gentoo-user] ceph on gentoo?

2014-12-23 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Anyone here running ceph / http://ceph.com/ on gentoo? As server(s) or client or ... ? I am learning about this right now and currently on my way to a first small test cluster. Very interesting possibilities ! Stefan

Re: [gentoo-user] ceph on gentoo?

2014-12-23 Thread Andrew Savchenko
Hi, On Tue, 23 Dec 2014 15:22:26 +0100 Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > Anyone here running ceph / http://ceph.com/ on gentoo? > > As server(s) or client or ... ? > > I am learning about this right now and currently on my way to a first > small test cluster. Very interesting possibilities ! We use

Re: [gentoo-user] ceph on gentoo?

2014-12-23 Thread Tomas Mozes
On 2014-12-23 15:22, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: Anyone here running ceph / http://ceph.com/ on gentoo? As server(s) or client or ... ? I am learning about this right now and currently on my way to a first small test cluster. Very interesting possibilities ! Stefan I tried the filesystem wit

Re: [gentoo-user] ceph on gentoo?

2014-12-23 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Am 23.12.2014 um 16:25 schrieb Tomas Mozes: > I tried the filesystem with kernel 3.7 a year ago (to export distfiles > to several machines). Since it's kernel based a bug caused my system to > reboot and sadly it was a database. However the project mentioned that > the filesystem wasn't production

Re: [gentoo-user] ceph on gentoo?

2014-12-23 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 23.12.2014 um 16:20 schrieb Andrew Savchenko: > Hi, > > On Tue, 23 Dec 2014 15:22:26 +0100 Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: >> Anyone here running ceph / http://ceph.com/ on gentoo? >> >> As server(s) or client or ... ? >> >> I am learning about this

[gentoo-user] Re: ceph on gentoo?

2014-12-23 Thread James
Stefan G. Weichinger xunil.at> writes: > > Though this was a year ago or so. Your mileage may vary and it is > > likely that during this year stability was improved. Ceph is very > > promising by both design and capabilities. > I expect that there were many changes over the time of a year ... t

[gentoo-user] Is lshw reporting correctly?

2014-12-23 Thread Mick
This is what I see when I plugged in two memory modules: === *-memory description: System Memory physical id: 2f slot: System board or motherboard size: 16GiB *-bank:0 description:

Re: [gentoo-user] ceph on gentoo?

2014-12-23 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Am 23.12.2014 um 16:28 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: > Am 23.12.2014 um 16:25 schrieb Tomas Mozes: > >> I tried the filesystem with kernel 3.7 a year ago (to export distfiles >> to several machines). Since it's kernel based a bug caused my system to >> reboot and sadly it was a database. However t

Re: [gentoo-user] ceph on gentoo?

2014-12-23 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > > got my first two demo nodes up and in-sync ... what a success ;-) I started to look into ceph, and my biggest issue is that they don't protect against silent corruption. They do checksum data during transit, but not at rest. That m

Re: [gentoo-user] ceph on gentoo?

2014-12-23 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Am 23.12.2014 um 21:40 schrieb Rich Freeman: > On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: >> >> got my first two demo nodes up and in-sync ... what a success ;-) > > I started to look into ceph, and my biggest issue is that they don't > protect against silent corruption. They do

Re: [gentoo-user] ceph on gentoo?

2014-12-23 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > Am 23.12.2014 um 21:40 schrieb Rich Freeman: >> On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: >>> >>> got my first two demo nodes up and in-sync ... what a success ;-) >> >> I started to look into ceph, and my biggest i

[gentoo-user] Re: ceph on gentoo?

2014-12-23 Thread Holger Hoffstätte
On Tue, 23 Dec 2014 21:54:00 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > At least for the future ... now that btrfs is declared stable at least Yeah, no. 3.18 is finally OK-ish (after they missed the .17 merge window with a huge number of fixes) but you really want to wait for 3.19. > In the other dir

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ceph on gentoo?

2014-12-23 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Am 23.12.2014 um 22:08 schrieb Holger Hoffstätte: > On Tue, 23 Dec 2014 21:54:00 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > >> At least for the future ... now that btrfs is declared stable at least > > Yeah, no. 3.18 is finally OK-ish (after they missed the .17 merge window > with a huge number of fix

Re: [gentoo-user] Is lshw reporting correctly?

2014-12-23 Thread Poison BL.
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Mick wrote: > This is what I see when I plugged in two memory modules: > === > *-memory > description: System Memory > physical id: 2f > slot: System board or motherboard >

Re: [gentoo-user] ceph on gentoo?

2014-12-23 Thread Bill Kenworthy
On 23/12/14 23:28, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > Am 23.12.2014 um 16:25 schrieb Tomas Mozes: > >> I tried the filesystem with kernel 3.7 a year ago (to export distfiles >> to several machines). Since it's kernel based a bug caused my system to >> reboot and sadly it was a database. However the pro

Re: [gentoo-user] ceph on gentoo?

2014-12-23 Thread Andrew Savchenko
Hi, On Tue, 23 Dec 2014 16:36:25 +0100 Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > Am 23.12.2014 um 16:20 schrieb Andrew Savchenko: [...] > > We used it about a year ago for our infrastructure (backup and live > > sync of HA systems), obviously both servers and clients were used, > > both on Gentoo. We stopped

[gentoo-user] gst-plugins-*

2014-12-23 Thread gottlieb
I shamefully had not run a --depclean for a few months. Today I did and was surprised by the barrage of gst-plugins to be removed. I have not changed any USE flags nor removed any packages. The plugins to remove include a large bunch where the 0.10.* version is to go but the 1.2.* version is to s

Re: [gentoo-user] gst-plugins-*

2014-12-23 Thread Canek Peláez Valdés
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 7:34 PM, wrote: > I shamefully had not run a --depclean for a few months. > Today I did and was surprised by the barrage of gst-plugins to be > removed. > > I have not changed any USE flags nor removed any packages. > > The plugins to remove include a large bunch where the

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ceph on gentoo?

2014-12-23 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Holger Hoffstätte wrote: > On Tue, 23 Dec 2014 21:54:00 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > >> In the other direction: what protects against these errors you mention? > > ceph scrub :) > Are you sure about that? I was under the impression that it just checked th

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ceph on gentoo?

2014-12-23 Thread Bill Kenworthy
On 24/12/14 11:24, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Holger Hoffstätte > wrote: >> On Tue, 23 Dec 2014 21:54:00 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: >> >>> In the other direction: what protects against these errors you mention? >> >> ceph scrub :) >> > > Are you sure about that