Joseph wrote:
> When I start Xfburn I get a message:
> No burners are currently available
> Possibly the disc(s) are in use, and cannot get accessed.
>
> How to check which program is using the DVD drive?
> "ps fax" is not showing that any program is using it.
There is no useful SCSI locking on
Joseph wrote:
> I've tried to burn a dvd from a command line:
> cdrecord -v -eject -dao speed=4 dev=0,0,0 dvd.iso
>
> but I got a generic error message that it is not possible.
Not sending the message does not help.
BTW: You specified dev=0,0,0, why did you do that?
Since 2004, cdrecord automat
Understood... I'll look for that.
2014-12-18 17:44 GMT-02:00 Neil Bothwick :
>
> On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 16:37:15 -0200, Fábio Emilio Costa wrote:
>
> > Someone had already played BD Video discs
> >
> > I bought a Pioneer BD player/recorder and I want to play BD films on it,
> > but the things I found
On Friday 19 Dec 2014 07:22:30 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Bill Kenworthy [14-12-19 08:00]:
> > On 19/12/14 13:39, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > (this happens on a embedded system)
> > >
> > > I ran into a problem I think...
> > >
> > > As adviced I run
> > >
> > > emer
Mick [14-12-19 12:20]:
> On Friday 19 Dec 2014 07:22:30 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> > Bill Kenworthy [14-12-19 08:00]:
> > > On 19/12/14 13:39, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > (this happens on a embedded system)
> > > >
> > > > I ran into a problem I think...
> > > >
>
On Friday 19 December 2014 11:18:34 Mick wrote:
> I run fix_libtool_files.sh after a new gcc
> is installed, BEFORE I remove the old version. I made a bit of a habit
> of this, but I don't know if modern ebuilds of gcc actually run the same
> script post install.
I've found that emerge -c gcc run
Old dogs and new tricks springs to mind. I am building a new PC and what with
UEFI, APUs and SSDs, it feels like that the world has moved a long way since
the last time I had to install gentoo.
I'll be taking my time to google, read and make appropriate selections, so
please bear with me while
Peter Humphrey [14-12-19 16:12]:
> On Friday 19 December 2014 11:18:34 Mick wrote:
> > I run fix_libtool_files.sh after a new gcc
> > is installed, BEFORE I remove the old version. I made a bit of a habit
> > of this, but I don't know if modern ebuilds of gcc actually run the same
> > script post
On Friday 19 Dec 2014 15:09:37 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Friday 19 December 2014 11:18:34 Mick wrote:
> > I run fix_libtool_files.sh after a new gcc
> > is installed, BEFORE I remove the old version. I made a bit of a habit
> > of this, but I don't know if modern ebuilds of gcc actually run the s
On Friday 19 December 2014 16:23:58 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Peter Humphrey [14-12-19 16:12]:
> > On Friday 19 December 2014 11:18:34 Mick wrote:
> > > I run fix_libtool_files.sh after a new gcc
> > > is installed, BEFORE I remove the old version. I made a bit of a
> > > habit
> > > of this,
* Mick [141219 10:22]:
[SNIP]
> I am trying to find out what is considered good practice as far as UEFI/MBR
> and boot management goes.
FWIW, I've built recent machines with UEFI/GPT but I mostly build recent
machines using BIOS-mode/GPT or MBR. It usually depends on how well the
mobo I'm using
On Friday 19 Dec 2014 15:23:58 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Peter Humphrey [14-12-19 16:12]:
> > On Friday 19 December 2014 11:18:34 Mick wrote:
> > > I run fix_libtool_files.sh after a new gcc
> > > is installed, BEFORE I remove the old version. I made a bit of a habit
> > > of this, but I don't
Mick [14-12-19 16:52]:
> On Friday 19 Dec 2014 15:23:58 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> > Peter Humphrey [14-12-19 16:12]:
> > > On Friday 19 December 2014 11:18:34 Mick wrote:
> > > > I run fix_libtool_files.sh after a new gcc
> > > > is installed, BEFORE I remove the old version. I made a bit of
Mick wrote:
> Meino, to avoid misunderstandings: 1. Emerge the new gcc package. 2.
> Use gcc-config to change to the new gcc version. 3. Run 'env-update &&
> source /etc/profile'. 4. Run fix_libtool_files.sh, although I would
> think that this is redundant these days. 5. Unmerge the old gcc version
On Friday 19 Dec 2014 15:53:53 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Mick [14-12-19 16:52]:
> > On Friday 19 Dec 2014 15:23:58 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> > > Peter Humphrey [14-12-19 16:12]:
> > > > On Friday 19 December 2014 11:18:34 Mick wrote:
> > > > > I run fix_libtool_files.sh after a new gcc
> >
On Friday 19 Dec 2014 15:46:43 Todd Goodman wrote:
> * Mick [141219 10:22]:
> [SNIP]
>
> > I am trying to find out what is considered good practice as far as
> > UEFI/MBR and boot management goes.
>
> FWIW, I've built recent machines with UEFI/GPT but I mostly build recent
> machines using BIOS-
Dale [14-12-19 17:08]:
> Mick wrote:
> > Meino, to avoid misunderstandings: 1. Emerge the new gcc package. 2.
> > Use gcc-config to change to the new gcc version. 3. Run 'env-update &&
> > source /etc/profile'. 4. Run fix_libtool_files.sh, although I would
> > think that this is redundant these da
On Friday 19 Dec 2014 16:06:46 Dale wrote:
> Mick wrote:
> > Meino, to avoid misunderstandings: 1. Emerge the new gcc package. 2.
> > Use gcc-config to change to the new gcc version. 3. Run 'env-update &&
> > source /etc/profile'. 4. Run fix_libtool_files.sh, although I would
> > think that this is
* Mick [141219 11:13]:
> On Friday 19 Dec 2014 15:46:43 Todd Goodman wrote:
> > * Mick [141219 10:22]:
> > [SNIP]
> >
> > > I am trying to find out what is considered good practice as far as
> > > UEFI/MBR and boot management goes.
> >
> > FWIW, I've built recent machines with UEFI/GPT but I mo
Mick [14-12-19 17:12]:
> On Friday 19 Dec 2014 15:53:53 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> > Mick [14-12-19 16:52]:
> > > On Friday 19 Dec 2014 15:23:58 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> > > > Peter Humphrey [14-12-19 16:12]:
> > > > > On Friday 19 December 2014 11:18:34 Mick wrote:
> > > > > > I run fix_l
During installation, just before running genkernel all, pressed something by
mistake in screen and that got me out of chroot. I have screen split up
horizontally and now whatever I type appears on two terminals simultaneously.
How do I enter in a stage where I left off and try to finish installa
On 19/12/2014 21:18, German wrote:
> During installation, just before running genkernel all, pressed something by
> mistake in screen and that got me out of chroot. I have screen split up
> horizontally and now whatever I type appears on two terminals simultaneously.
> How do I enter in a stage
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Dale [14-12-19 17:08]:
>> Mick wrote:
>>> Meino, to avoid misunderstandings: 1. Emerge the new gcc package. 2.
>>> Use gcc-config to change to the new gcc version. 3. Run 'env-update &&
>>> source /etc/profile'. 4. Run fix_libtool_files.sh, although I would
>>> think t
Is anyone can advice on where to dig. It seems that grub isn't installed
because I can't access it pressing ESC key and I return to bios. During
installation there were no errors reported, the system installed grub just
fine. Also grub.cfg found all my kernels and ramdisks? Thanks for any
sugge
141220 German wrote:
> It seems that Grub isn't installed,
> because I can't access it pressing ESC key and I return to BIOS.
> During installation there were no errors reported,
> the system installed Grub just fine
> & grub.cfg found all my kernels and ramdisks.
If you continue to have difficult
On Fri, 19 Dec 2014 15:22:04 +, Mick wrote:
> The MoBo is capable of booting in CMS mode, but I am not sure if there
> are any benefits in creating a 2MB partition for a conventional MBR
> bootloader, or I should forego MBR altogether and go directly with a
> GPT FAT32 EFI System Partition (ES
On Friday 19 Dec 2014 18:23:36 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Mick [14-12-19 17:12]:
> > On Friday 19 Dec 2014 15:53:53 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> > > Mick [14-12-19 16:52]:
> > > > On Friday 19 Dec 2014 15:23:58 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> > > > > Peter Humphrey [14-12-19 16:12]:
> > > > > > O
On Friday 19 Dec 2014 20:30:07 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 19/12/2014 21:18, German wrote:
> > During installation, just before running genkernel all, pressed something
> > by mistake in screen and that got me out of chroot. I have screen split
> > up horizontally and now whatever I type appears on t
Hopefully some emacs/gnus adept will have some idea what's going here.
I've hit a snag after deciding to use the gentoo approach to acquiring
and tracking a fast moving emacs from bzr sources.
I've emerged emacs-vcs and a few required pkgs.
After adjusting my emacs init files to suit the new arr
Just a follow up to my original question. I've installed grub on /dev/SDA
literally following the quide. And I just realized why I made /dev/sda1
partition obviously designed for grub? Should I have been install grub into
/dev/sda1? I also have uefi system and I think it matters. Thanks everyone
Am Samstag, 20.12.2014 um 03:57
schrieb German :
> Just a follow up to my original question. I've installed grub
> on /dev/SDA literally following the quide. And I just realized why I
I think the MBR of your first drive (/dev/sda) is usually the right
place for grub if you only have one OS (gento
> I still use GRUB to boot ISO images, and have a sysrescd image in /boot
> for this. With UEFI, you can have more than one bootloader installed. I
> hadn't considered the possibility of UEFI booting to an ISO directly, I'd
> be interested to know if it is possible.
Typically one takes the content
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 9:03 PM, Sid S wrote:
>
> Anyway, I am kind of surprised people are still having problems with UEFI.
> It's necessary to turn SecureBoot off, but otherwise I just got everything to
> work.
>
I've yet to do an EFI install, but presumably you could either sign
the kernel or
On 2014-12-20 00:57, German wrote:
Just a follow up to my original question. I've installed grub on
/dev/SDA literally following the quide. And I just realized why I made
/dev/sda1 partition obviously designed for grub? Should I have been
install grub into /dev/sda1? I also have uefi system and I
34 matches
Mail list logo
