On Mon, 24 Mar 2014 20:23:55 +, Mick wrote:
> I have been chasing my tail with ruby tonight.
>
> The masking of ruby18 meant that I had to unmerge a lot of ruby packages
> and then portage chose what to merge afresh.
unmerge or depclean? unmerge is less safe and may leave your system in a
Dale gmail.com> writes:
> >> This is confusing.
> Thanks. I'll post when I get to test some more.
Sure, I'll be curious how/what the resolution is to the
usb disappearing.
Do check your usb rules (udev? systemd ? ) or where ever they
are defined; for how it is defined on the usb buss oft
On Tuesday 25 Mar 2014 06:31:51 Hans de Graaff wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Mar 2014 20:23:55 +, Mick wrote:
> > I have been chasing my tail with ruby tonight.
> >
> > The masking of ruby18 meant that I had to unmerge a lot of ruby packages
> > and then portage chose what to merge afresh.
>
> unmerge
The 21/03/14, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 07:10:49 -0500
> Dale wrote:
>
> > So let's get this straight. You want most everyone on this list to
> > change what they have to do to remove dups caused by you, instead of
> > you changing what you do to fix the problem?
>
> Everyone els
The 21/03/14, Dale wrote:
> Tom Wijsman wrote:
> > On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:41:03 -0500
> > Dale wrote:
> >
> >> FYI. Most people don't say anything, they just blacklist you. After
> >> that, you don't exist to them.
> > Yes, that's up to those few; it could happen, but most respond instead.
>
>
On Tue, March 25, 2014 16:35, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
> The 21/03/14, Tom Wijsman wrote:
>> On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 07:10:49 -0500
>> Dale wrote:
>>
>> > So let's get this straight. You want most everyone on this list to
>> > change what they have to do to remove dups caused by you, instead of
>> > y
On Sat, 15 Mar 2014 20:56:26 +
Mick wrote:
> On Saturday 15 Mar 2014 17:17:19 »Q« wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 13:33:20 +
> >
> > Mick wrote:
> > > On Saturday 08 Mar 2014 20:22:12 »Q« wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 08 Mar 2014 08:23:21 +0100
> > > >
> > > > grub booted Gentoo just fine,
On Sun, 16 Mar 2014 11:07:49 +0200
Matti Nykyri wrote:
> On Mar 15, 2014, at 19:17, »Q« wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 13:33:20 +
> > Mick wrote:
> >
> >> On Saturday 08 Mar 2014 20:22:12 »Q« wrote:
> >>> On Sat, 08 Mar 2014 08:23:21 +0100
> >
> >>> grub booted Gentoo just fine, but Wi
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 06:37:20 -0400
Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 3/20/2014 5:48 PM, »Q« wrote:
> > Why should Gentoo have a default?
>
> Defaults are always a good idea - as long as they are reasonable and
> rational.
In that case, Gentoo is missing a lot of "good" things, from a default
system logge
Howdy,
So I have these entries in my /etc/default/grub file:
GRUB_DISTRIBUTOR="Gentoo"
GRUB_DEFAULT=kernel-3.13.6-gentoo
GRUB_HIDDEN_TIMEOUT=3
GRUB_TIMEOUT=10
GRUB_GFXMODE=1024x768
I ran 'grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub/grub.cfg'
after the last ebuild of 3.13.6-gentoo
/boot shows:
kernel-3.13.0-g
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 17:01:47 +0100
"Stefan G. Weichinger" wrote:
>
> I happily use git for local repositories to track configs in /etc or
> for example, /root/bin or /usr/local/bin (scripts ..)
>
> There is also etckeeper, yes, useful as well.
>
> But I would like to have some kind of meta-rep
> OK,
So I built this kernel twice, one with DRM * and once DRM [m]
In the /boot dir ; diff config-3.13.6-gentoo config-3.13.6B-gentoo
yeilds:
2256,2257c2256,2257
< CONFIG_AGP=y
< CONFIG_AGP_AMD64=y
---
> CONFIG_AGP=m
> CONFIG_AGP_AMD64=m
2264,2265c2264,2265
< CONFIG_DRM=y
< CONFIG_DRM_KMS_HEL
On Tue, 25 Mar 2014 20:42:07 + (UTC), James wrote:
> So I have these entries in my /etc/default/grub file:
>
> GRUB_DISTRIBUTOR="Gentoo"
> GRUB_DEFAULT=kernel-3.13.6-gentoo
> GRUB_HIDDEN_TIMEOUT=3
> GRUB_TIMEOUT=10
> GRUB_GFXMODE=1024x768
>
> I ran 'grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub/grub.cfg'
> a
On Tue, 25 Mar 2014 20:48:29 + (UTC), James wrote:
> So I built this kernel twice, one with DRM * and once DRM [m]
>
> So when I boot the one with DRM_Radeon=m, I still get this error
> message building the latest radeon driver:
>
> * Checking for suitable kernel configuration options...
> (
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 26/03/14 07:48, James wrote:
> So I built this kernel twice, one with DRM * and once DRM [m]
> Sure it can easily be related to my limited knowledge of grub2, but I did
> boot the 3.13.6B version of the kernel where all is set as modules
On 25/03/2014 22:08, »Q« wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 06:37:20 -0400
> Tanstaafl wrote:
>
>> On 3/20/2014 5:48 PM, »Q« wrote:
>>> Why should Gentoo have a default?
>>
>> Defaults are always a good idea - as long as they are reasonable and
>> rational.
>
> In that case, Gentoo is missing a lot
On Wed, 26 Mar 2014 00:25:26 +0200
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 25/03/2014 22:08, »Q« wrote:
> > On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 06:37:20 -0400
> > Tanstaafl wrote:
> >
> >> On 3/20/2014 5:48 PM, »Q« wrote:
> >>> Why should Gentoo have a default?
> >>
> >> Defaults are always a good idea - as long as they ar
On 26/03/2014 01:34, »Q« wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Mar 2014 00:25:26 +0200
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
>> On 25/03/2014 22:08, »Q« wrote:
>>> On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 06:37:20 -0400
>>> Tanstaafl wrote:
>>>
On 3/20/2014 5:48 PM, »Q« wrote:
> Why should Gentoo have a default?
Defaults are a
18 matches
Mail list logo
