on 01/30/2014 08:30 AM Mick wrote the following:
> On Wednesday 29 Jan 2014 19:37:39 Thanasis wrote:
>>> Sometimes folks have to stay with a kernel series, because a vendor
>>> binary patch forces them into this situation.
>>
>> That's my case, ie Nvidia drivers for a relatively old hardware (AGP
>
on 01/30/2014 12:50 AM Alan McKinnon wrote the following:
>> On 30/01/2014 00:14, Thanasis wrote:
>> Yea, but I think, this is the case for *all* packages, not only kernel
>> sources, at least until now, isn't it?
>
> No, not at all.
>
> Kernels are different and portage treats them very differen
On 30/01/2014 11:54, Thanasis wrote:
> on 01/30/2014 12:50 AM Alan McKinnon wrote the following:
>>> On 30/01/2014 00:14, Thanasis wrote:
>>> Yea, but I think, this is the case for *all* packages, not only kernel
>>> sources, at least until now, isn't it?
>>
>> No, not at all.
>>
>> Kernels are dif
Thanasis asyr.hopto.org> writes:
> That's my case, ie Nvidia drivers for a relatively old hardware (AGP
> Graphics).
> Nothing special. I am merely a home user, maintaining a few PCs. That's all.
Nividia is a *VENDOR* that chooses not to provide information so
drivers can be properly maintain
On 30/01/2014 17:25, James wrote:
> As part of the open source community, I would think you have a
> repsonsibility to *reward those vendors that work generously with the
> greater open source community* ?
No, not actually. The only responsibility he has is to do whatever he
feels like doing.
On Thursday 30 Jan 2014 15:25:47 James wrote:
> Nividia is a *VENDOR* that chooses not to provide information so
> drivers can be properly maintained, historically. ATI (AMD now) is a vendor
> who provides information so drivers can be maintained, even optimized, into
> perpetuity.
>
> Maybe you
On 30 Jan 2014, at 03:50 am, hasufell wrote:
> I just tried paludis again (after some time).
> ...
> * you cannot unmask USE flags at all, not without hackery... and that
> is really non-trivial for unmasking abi_x86_32 globally, because those
> masks are scattered across a lot of files in profi
Peter Humphrey prh.myzen.co.uk> writes:
> > Maybe you chose unwisely?(get ATI next time) unless
>
> I've used nVidia cards for many years. When I bought my first one
> (maybe 20 years ago) ATI support in Linux was woeful, and the doggerel
> had it that the hardware was less com
on 01/30/2014 11:04 PM James wrote the following:
> Peter Humphrey prh.myzen.co.uk> writes:
>
>
>>> Maybe you chose unwisely?(get ATI next time) unless
>
>>
>> I've used nVidia cards for many years. When I bought my first one
>> (maybe 20 years ago) ATI support in Linux was woeful
Hi,
On AMD64, recent Gentoo Linux, the library
media-libs/lilv-0.18.0
failed to compile:
* ERROR: media-libs/lilv-0.18.0::gentoo failed (configure phase):
* configure failed
*
* Call stack:
* ebuild.sh, line 93: Called src_configure
* environment, line 2131: Called waf-
10 matches
Mail list logo
