Re: [gentoo-user] Au revoir, gnome-3.8

2013-08-07 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 07/08/13 05:25, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote: On Tue, Aug 06 2013, Samuli Suominen wrote: that's only because gnome 3.8 hasn't been stabilized yet. as in, there are no plans in keeping gnome 2.x available after gnome 3.8 stabilization. Am I correct in believing that gnome-3.8 (whether in testing

Re: [gentoo-user] export LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8

2013-08-07 Thread Kerin Millar
On 06/08/2013 23:42, Stroller wrote: On 6 August 2013, at 14:04, Kerin Millar wrote: ... If undefined, the value of LC_COLLATE is inherited from LANG. I'm not sure that overriding it is particularly useful nowadays but it doesn't hurt. It's been a couple of years since I looked into this, bu

[gentoo-user] Is it possible to use the x32 abi gcc version to build a amd64 system?

2013-08-07 Thread 东方巽雷
x32 abi is a new abi which is different from x86_64 and x86.Some softwares cannot compile on x32 system,but glibc,gcc,binutils,works well on x32 abi with faster speed than x86_64.So I would to make such a gcc version,its abi is x32,but its default target is x86_64,similar to cross compiler.Then I

Re: [gentoo-user] export LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8

2013-08-07 Thread Stroller
On 7 August 2013, at 13:41, Kerin Millar wrote: > On 06/08/2013 23:42, Stroller wrote: >> >> On 6 August 2013, at 14:04, Kerin Millar wrote: >>> ... >>> If undefined, the value of LC_COLLATE is inherited from LANG. I'm not sure >>> that overriding it is particularly useful nowadays but it doesn

Re: [gentoo-user] export LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8

2013-08-07 Thread Kerin Millar
On 07/08/2013 17:40, Stroller wrote: On 7 August 2013, at 13:41, Kerin Millar wrote: On 06/08/2013 23:42, Stroller wrote: On 6 August 2013, at 14:04, Kerin Millar wrote: ... If undefined, the value of LC_COLLATE is inherited from LANG. I'm not sure that overriding it is particularly useful

Re: [gentoo-user] Au revoir, gnome-3.8

2013-08-07 Thread gottlieb
On Wed, Aug 07 2013, Samuli Suominen wrote: > On 07/08/13 05:25, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 06 2013, Samuli Suominen wrote: >> >>> that's only because gnome 3.8 hasn't been stabilized yet. as in, there >>> are no plans in keeping gnome 2.x available after gnome 3.8 >>> stabilization. >

[gentoo-user] Re: Au revoir, gnome-3.8

2013-08-07 Thread walt
On 08/07/2013 04:25 PM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote: > On Wed, Aug 07 2013, Samuli Suominen wrote: > >> On 07/08/13 05:25, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 06 2013, Samuli Suominen wrote: >>> that's only because gnome 3.8 hasn't been stabilized yet. as in, there are no plans in keeping

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Au revoir, gnome-3.8

2013-08-07 Thread Canek Peláez Valdés
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 7:48 PM, walt wrote: > On 08/07/2013 04:25 PM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 07 2013, Samuli Suominen wrote: >> >>> On 07/08/13 05:25, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote: On Tue, Aug 06 2013, Samuli Suominen wrote: > that's only because gnome 3.8 hasn't been stabi