Am 30.03.2013 12:36, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> But small progress, yes.
I am close, I feel it :-)
Switched to wvdial to rule out NM etc.
wvdialconf etc
I now have:
[Dialer Defaults]
Modem Type = Analog Modem
Dial Attempts = 1
ISDN = 0
New PPPD = yes
Init1 = ATZ
Init3 = ATQ0 V1 E1 S
On Tuesday 02 Apr 2013 13:13:26 Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 30.03.2013 12:36, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> > But small progress, yes.
>
> I am close, I feel it :-)
>
> Switched to wvdial to rule out NM etc.
>
> wvdialconf etc
>
> I now have:
>
> [Dialer Defaults]
> Modem Type = An
On Tuesday 02 Apr 2013 14:06:37 you wrote:
> That's how I understand these devices to work, but unfortunately I can't
> verify any of this because I do not have access to such a device or a 4G
> network. :-(
Yep, you are meant to see an ethernet interface coming up, which network
manager will p
Am 02.04.2013 15:19, schrieb Mick:
> On Tuesday 02 Apr 2013 14:06:37 you wrote:
>
>> That's how I understand these devices to work, but unfortunately I
>> can't verify any of this because I do not have access to such a
>> device or a 4G network. :-(
>
> Yep, you are meant to see an ethernet in
Am 02.04.2013 15:06, schrieb Mick:
> On Tuesday 02 Apr 2013 13:13:26 Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>> Modem Type = Analog Modem
> Are you sure it is an analogue modem? Is this entry needed?
Dunno. Removed. No difference.
> The driver should create a number of devices,
> ttyUSB0/ttyUSB1/ttyUSB2/...
Am 02.04.2013 15:52, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> So I am back on cdc_ncm now. And I removed all the stuff I installed
> when testing that huawei-driver-package.
phew.
Next small steps (but somehow promising):
I was able to connect via wvdial and pull an IPv4-IP-adress via dhcpcd ...
but th
forgot my current lsmod:
> # lsmod
Module Size Used by
ppp_async 6157 0
crc_ccitt 1565 1 ppp_async
ppp_generic17250 1 ppp_async
slhc4443 1 ppp_generic
option 26658 0
usb_wwan6870 1
Am 02.04.2013 16:27, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> Am 02.04.2013 15:52, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>
>> So I am back on cdc_ncm now. And I removed all the stuff I installed
>> when testing that huawei-driver-package.
>
> phew.
>
> Next small steps (but somehow promising):
>
> I was able to
Hi all gentoo people!
I've been away from gentoo for a while, and I'm in the process of
reinstalling it today.
While downloading the stage 3 I noticed that only an i486 version is
available. As far as I remember, gentoo was best known, back in the
days, for being fast, as it was one of the first di
Am 02.04.2013 19:51, schrieb Davide Carnovale:
> Hi all gentoo people!
> I've been away from gentoo for a while, and I'm in the process of
> reinstalling it today.
> While downloading the stage 3 I noticed that only an i486 version is
> available. As far as I remember, gentoo was best known, back i
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 07:51:17PM +0200, Davide Carnovale wrote:
> Hi all gentoo people!
> I've been away from gentoo for a while, and I'm in the process of
> reinstalling it today.
> While downloading the stage 3 I noticed that only an i486 version is
> available. As far as I remember, gentoo was
Michael, thanks, i know amd64 would be better, i used to had a
multilib system, but for now i have a problem with java and 64-bit so
i'm stuck on the 32-bit world for now =)
Bruce, i see that, it looks like it's hardened indeed, i'll see what
being hardened means and if it fits me, thank you. anyw
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> The most important para to me in the news item was: "The feature can also be
> completely disabled using net.ifnames=0 on the kernel command line." I just
> added that to my grub.conf entries and I sail blissfully on with eth0.
I updated re
On 02/04/2013 19:51, Davide Carnovale wrote:
> Hi all gentoo people!
> I've been away from gentoo for a while, and I'm in the process of
> reinstalling it today.
> While downloading the stage 3 I noticed that only an i486 version is
> available. As far as I remember, gentoo was best known, back in
On 02/04/2013 21:13, Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Peter Humphrey
> wrote:
>> The most important para to me in the news item was: "The feature can also be
>> completely disabled using net.ifnames=0 on the kernel command line." I just
>> added that to my grub.conf entries a
On 02-Apr-13 21:13, Paul Hartman wrote:
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
The most important para to me in the news item was: "The feature can also be
completely disabled using net.ifnames=0 on the kernel command line." I just
added that to my grub.conf entries and I sail bl
Ahaha thanks Alan, very explanatory and funny email!
I won't say "gentoo is fast" anymore, I promise. :-)
As for the rest i'll just keep the i486 base and start from there since I
already compiled the kernel and stuff...
Thanks all
D
Il giorno 02/apr/2013 21:18, "Alan McKinnon" ha
scritto:
> O
On 2013-04-02 3:21 PM, Jarry wrote:
On 02-Apr-13 21:13, Paul Hartman wrote:
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Peter Humphrey
wrote:
The most important para to me in the news item was: "The feature can
also be
completely disabled using net.ifnames=0 on the kernel command line."
I just
added that
On 02/04/2013 21:41, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2013-04-02 3:21 PM, Jarry wrote:
>> On 02-Apr-13 21:13, Paul Hartman wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Peter Humphrey
>>> wrote:
The most important para to me in the news item was: "The feature can
also be
completely disabled usin
:-)
While we're on the welcome stage, you should be introduced to some of
the regulars around here:
I'm the snarky old git with the weird sense of humour that often morphs
into biting sarcasm.
Neil Bothwick is the eccentric English gent who can get across a whole
paragraph in two words. He also
On 2013-04-02, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> No, you are stilling misunderstanding.
He's not the only one.
> The news item goes to great lengths to explain that there is a new
> way and it is different from the old way.
I did grok that much. I had a 70-persistent-net.rules file that named
my three i
On 02/04/2013 22:31, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2013-04-02, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
>> No, you are stilling misunderstanding.
>
> He's not the only one.
>
>> The news item goes to great lengths to explain that there is a new
>> way and it is different from the old way.
>
> I did grok that much.
On Tuesday 02 April 2013 19:51:17 Davide Carnovale wrote:
> Hi all gentoo people!
> I've been away from gentoo for a while, and I'm in the process of
> reinstalling it today.
> While downloading the stage 3 I noticed that only an i486 version is
> available. As far as I remember, gentoo was best kn
Am Tue, 2 Apr 2013 20:31:10 + (UTC)
schrieb Grant Edwards :
> On 2013-04-02, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> > No, you are stilling misunderstanding.
>
> He's not the only one.
>
> > The news item goes to great lengths to explain that there is a new
> > way and it is different from the old way.
>
Am Tue, 2 Apr 2013 23:15:40 +0200
schrieb Marc Joliet :
> Am Tue, 2 Apr 2013 20:31:10 + (UTC)
> schrieb Grant Edwards :
>
> > On 2013-04-02, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >
> > > No, you are stilling misunderstanding.
> >
> > He's not the only one.
> >
> > > The news item goes to great lengths t
On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 20:31:10 + (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote:
> In Flameyes blog, he showed an example of using udev rules pretty much
> identical to the ones I already had, so I couldn't figure out what was
> different (other than the default interface names, which still aren't
> really predictab
Alan, thanks a lot for the cool description of you guys, I hope i'll get to
know you all :-)
Francesco, thank you, but you linked alpha and amd64, and i can't see any
recent one for x86
D
Il giorno 02/apr/2013 23:01, "Francesco Talamona" <
francesco.talam...@know.eu> ha scritto:
> On Tuesday 02
I always used net-misc/ntp for syncing time.
Now I found net-misc/chrony and set it up looks good so far.
Any opinions and experiences on the various ways of getting THE TIME?
Stefan
On 04/02/2013 12:17 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> Oh, and "gentoo is fast" is a nono swear word these days. That's ricing
> :-) Nowadays we say the benefit of gentoo is USE so you get what *you*
> want :-)
>
When I'm asked, I say that gentoo is extremely flexible and can be
tailored in almost inf
On 03/31/2013 06:00 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> Am 01.04.2013 01:12, schrieb walt:
>> Any of you admin types out there have any grumpy thoughts about this
>> article? :) Is it really just marketing BS from cloudflare, or is it
>> solid stuff?
>>
>> http://blog.cloudflare.com/the-ddos-that-al
Am 03.04.2013 02:35, schrieb walt:
> On 03/31/2013 06:00 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>> Am 01.04.2013 01:12, schrieb walt:
>>> Any of you admin types out there have any grumpy thoughts about this
>>> article? :) Is it really just marketing BS from cloudflare, or is it
>>> solid stuff?
>>>
>>>
On 03/31/2013 08:37 PM, luis jure wrote:
> i'm more than irritated by the
> assholes minimizing the problem, or treating this as "non-news".
Of course I don't know exactly which irritating people you mean, but
there is one senior poster in this mailing list who (very rarely) lapses
into posting
on 2013-04-02 at 17:58 walt wrote:
> On 03/31/2013 08:37 PM, luis jure wrote:
>
> > i'm more than irritated by the
> > assholes minimizing the problem, or treating this as "non-news".
>
> Of course I don't know exactly which irritating people you mean,
i was referring specifically to the guar
as for the i486 only thing, my guess is because the kernel dropped support
for 386 when 3.8 came out
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Daniel Frey wrote:
> On 04/02/2013 12:17 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >
> > Oh, and "gentoo is fast" is a nono swear word these days. That's ricing
> > :-) Nowadays
Am 01.04.2013 05:37, schrieb luis jure:
>
> i'm glad for all the people who weren't affected. but whatever it was, i've
> been suffering the consequences. so i'm more than irritated by the
> assholes minimizing the problem, or treating this as "non-news".
>
if you meant me - it is none-news. Or, i
Do guinea pigs work better or worse than tribbles at calming you?
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann <
volkerar...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Am 03.04.2013 02:35, schrieb walt:
> > On 03/31/2013 06:00 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> >> Am 01.04.2013 01:12, schrieb walt:
> >>> A
on 2013-04-03 at 03:33 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> if you meant me -
read my previous post(s).
Raymond Jennings wrote:
>Do guinea pigs work better or worse than tribbles at calming you?
>
>
>On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann <
>volkerar...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> Am 03.04.2013 02:35, schrieb walt:
>> > On 03/31/2013 06:00 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>> >> Am 01.0
On Tuesday 02 Apr 2013 16:48:26 Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 02.04.2013 16:27, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> > Am 02.04.2013 15:52, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> >> So I am back on cdc_ncm now. And I removed all the stuff I installed
> >> when testing that huawei-driver-package.
> >
> > ph
39 matches
Mail list logo
