On 31-Mar-13 4:08, Paul Hartman wrote:
Coincidentally, yesterday US-CERT published a small article about DNS
amplification attacks and mitigation strategies:
http://www.us-cert.gov/ncas/alerts/TA13-088A
Thanks for interesting link. I did not know bind has support
for response rate-limiting...
On 30/03/13 17:15, Tanstaafl wrote:
Ok, just read the new news item and the linked udev-guide wiki page
You should probably also read:
http://blog.flameeyes.eu/2013/03/predictably-non-persistent-names
and:
http://blog.flameeyes.eu/2013/03/predictable-persistently-non-mnemonic-names
On 2013-03-31, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 30/03/13 17:15, Tanstaafl wrote:
>> Ok, just read the new news item and the linked udev-guide wiki page
>
> You should probably also read:
>
>http://blog.flameeyes.eu/2013/03/predictably-non-persistent-names
>
> and:
>
>
> http://blog.flameeyes.eu
Am 31.03.2013 05:12, schrieb Walter Dnes:
> On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 10:04:24PM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote
>> On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
>>> Did an update today. After the update, I checked again...
>>>
>>> [d531][waltdnes][~] emerge -pv --update --changed-use world
>>>
>
On 2013-03-31, Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg) wrote:
> On 2013-03-31, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>> On 30/03/13 17:15, Tanstaafl wrote:
>>> Ok, just read the new news item and the linked udev-guide wiki page
>>
>> You should probably also read:
>>
>>http://blog.flameeyes.eu/2013/03/predictably-non-pe
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 01:56:25PM +0200, Michael Hampicke wrote
> You can also try adding --deep to your emerge options.
That seems to be it...
emerge -pv --update --changed-use --deep --with-bdeps=y world
produces a list of packages. The list ends with...
> Total: 52 packages (29 upgrades
On Sunday 31 March 2013 14:09:56 Walter Dnes wrote:
> I keep a previous version of the kernel (gentoo-sources) as a fallback,
> and --depclean wants to remove that, which I want to keep.
if you let it unmerge the old kernel it will only remove the sources.
Everything that's generated by building
On Mar 31, 2013 7:13 PM, "Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg)"
wrote:
>
> On 2013-03-31, Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg) wrote:
> > On 2013-03-31, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> >> On 30/03/13 17:15, Tanstaafl wrote:
> >>> Ok, just read the new news item and the linked udev-guide wiki page
> >>
> >> You should probab
Googled and can't seem to find an answer to this...
I've had FEATURES="buildpkg" for some time on my system, so I already
have udev-171-r10 quickpkg'd...
But for the life of me, I can't seem to find instructions for how to
convert /usr/portage/packages/sys-fs/udev-171-r10.tbz2 to an ebuild th
On 2013-03-30 1:41 PM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
All my servers use mdev.
'nuff said.
I do remember the conversation about mdev... probably should have paid
closer attention.
Is the conversion fairly simple? Is there an updated how-to,
specifically for older udev (171)?
Thanks...
On 2013-03-30 1:22 PM, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
On 03/30/2013 11:24 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
Ok, I don't understand this...
emerge -pvuDN world shows updates to BOTH virtual/udev-197-r2 *and*
udev-200, with strange Blockers referencing udev-186???
My reading is: there are some packages eithe
Pandu Poluan wrote:
>
>
>
> Since it's obvious that upsteam has this "my way or the highway"
> mentality, I'm curious about whether eudev (and mdev) exhibits the
> same behavior...
>
> Rgds,
> --
>
I synced yesterday and I didn't see the news alert. Last eudev update
was in Feb. so I *guess* not
Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2013-03-30 1:41 PM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>> All my servers use mdev.
>>
>> 'nuff said.
>
> I do remember the conversation about mdev... probably should have paid
> closer attention.
>
> Is the conversion fairly simple? Is there an updated how-to,
> specifically for older udev
On 31/03/13 at 12:41pm, Tanstaafl wrote:
> Googled and can't seem to find an answer to this...
>
> I've had FEATURES="buildpkg" for some time on my system, so I already
> have udev-171-r10 quickpkg'd...
>
> But for the life of me, I can't seem to find instructions for how to
> convert /usr/port
From the elog which I applied carefully and the links to Flameeyes blog kindly
shared in this M/L, I thought that I would have to rename *all* my interfaces.
Therefore I was surprised to find that only my eth0 changed to enp11s0, while
my wlan0 stayed the same. I even rebooted to make sure and
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 09:09:56 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
> emerge -p --depclean
>
> generates dire warnings.
I wouldn't call this dire
* Always study the list of packages to be cleaned for any obvious
* mistakes. Packages that are part of the world set will always
* be kept. They can be man
On 2013-03-31, Dale wrote:
> Pandu Poluan wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Since it's obvious that upsteam has this "my way or the highway"
>> mentality, I'm curious about whether eudev (and mdev) exhibits the
>> same behavior...
>>
>
> I synced yesterday and I didn't see the news alert. Last eudev update
> w
Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg) wrote:
> On 2013-03-31, Dale wrote:
>> Pandu Poluan wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Since it's obvious that upsteam has this "my way or the highway"
>>> mentality, I'm curious about whether eudev (and mdev) exhibits the
>>> same behavior...
>>>
>> I synced yesterday and I didn't see th
On 2013-03-31 1:10 PM, Yohan Pereira wrote:
What you need to do is add the original ebuild for udev-171 to your
local overlay as is. Then run emerge using the -g option see man
emerge.
Hmmm... I had thought that the local ebuild was gone due to it being
removed from portage, but yep, there it
On 2013-03-31, Dale wrote:
> Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg) wrote:
>> On 2013-03-31, Dale wrote:
>>> Pandu Poluan wrote:
Since it's obvious that upsteam has this "my way or the highway"
mentality, I'm curious about whether eudev (and mdev) exhibits the
same behavior...
>>>
Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg) wrote:
> On 2013-03-31, Dale wrote:
>> Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg) wrote:
>>> On 2013-03-31, Dale wrote:
Pandu Poluan wrote:
>
> Since it's obvious that upsteam has this "my way or the highway"
> mentality, I'm curious about whether eudev (and mdev) exhibits
Am 31.03.2013 04:08, schrieb Paul Hartman:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 3:51 AM, Norman Rieß wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> i am using pdns recursor to provide a dns server which should be usable
>> for everybody.The problem is, that the server seems to be used in dns
>> amplification attacks.
>> I googled a
On 31/03/2013 20:26, Dale wrote:
> Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg) wrote:
>> On 2013-03-31, Dale wrote:
>>> Pandu Poluan wrote:
Since it's obvious that upsteam has this "my way or the highway"
mentality, I'm curious about whether eudev (and mdev) exhibits the
same behavior...
>>>
On 31/03/2013 18:41, Tanstaafl wrote:
> Googled and can't seem to find an answer to this...
>
> I've had FEATURES="buildpkg" for some time on my system, so I already
> have udev-171-r10 quickpkg'd...
>
> But for the life of me, I can't seem to find instructions for how to
> convert /usr/portage/p
On 31/03/2013 20:30, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2013-03-31 1:10 PM, Yohan Pereira wrote:
>> What you need to do is add the original ebuild for udev-171 to your
>> local overlay as is. Then run emerge using the -g option see man
>> emerge.
>
> Hmmm... I had thought that the local ebuild was gone due to
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 13:44:18 -0500, Dale wrote:
> I'm just hoping people will be able to find a solution to this that
> works well for them. I especially wish that for those managing a remote
> system with little or no physical access.
Well I just updated a headless box, followed the instructio
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 11:48:19 + (UTC)
"Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg)" wrote:
> instead of pushing a completely
> different (and possibly less reliable) naming scheme by default.
Whilst I wouldn't want them changing on me (though if your physically
changing the pci slot then you should be able to h
On 2013-03-31 3:14 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
A copy of the ebuild for the*currently*installed* package is in
/var/db/pkg//-/*ebuild
Oh... so I should use that instead of what is in /usr/portage/sys-fs?
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 31/03/2013 20:26, Dale wrote:
>> Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg) wrote:
>>> On 2013-03-31, Dale wrote:
Pandu Poluan wrote:
>
> Since it's obvious that upsteam has this "my way or the highway"
> mentality, I'm curious about whether eudev (and mdev) exhibits the
>
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 15:40:09 +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> > instead of pushing a completely
> > different (and possibly less reliable) naming scheme by default.
>
> Whilst I wouldn't want them changing on me (though if your physically
> changing the pci slot then you should be able to handle
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 15:44:49 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
> > A copy of the ebuild for the*currently*installed* package is in
> > /var/db/pkg//-/*ebuild
>
> Oh... so I should use that instead of what is in /usr/portage/sys-fs?
No, you only do that if the original is not available. Copy the whole
s
On 03/31/2013 03:55 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 15:40:09 +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
>
>>> instead of pushing a completely
>>> different (and possibly less reliable) naming scheme by default.
>>
>> Whilst I wouldn't want them changing on me (though if your physically
>> chang
Le 31/03/13 à 21:14, Alan a tapoté :
> On 31/03/2013 18:41, Tanstaafl wrote:
> > But for the life of me, I can't seem to find instructions for how to
> > convert /usr/portage/packages/sys-fs/udev-171-r10.tbz2 to an ebuild
> > that I can then add to my local overlay...
>
> The quickpkg is a tarball
On 2013-03-31 3:37 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
What the article didn't mention was that if you change your interface
names, you have to create a new symlink in /etc/init.d and add it to
the default runlevel. I'm glad I spotted that one before rebooting:)
So, just
ln -s net.net0 -> net.lo
Then a
On 2013-03-31 3:56 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 15:44:49 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
A copy of the ebuild for the*currently*installed* package is in
/var/db/pkg//-/*ebuild
Oh... so I should use that instead of what is in /usr/portage/sys-fs?
No, you only do that if the origina
On 2013-03-31 3:16 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
So, do I also copy the manifest file? metadata.xml? files dir? Or do I
just copy the ebuild then regenerate the manifest file?
You will need the files dir.
metadata.xml is not necessary in your personal overlay.
You will almost always regenerate the
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 20:55:00 +0100
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> What about USB network adaptors? A user may not even realise they
> plugged it into a different USB slot from last time, yet the device
> name changes.
Fair point but wouldn't that be only if you plug in two of the same
type that the name
On 2013-03-31, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
> On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 13:44:18 -0500, Dale wrote:
>
>> I'm just hoping people will be able to find a solution to this that
>> works well for them. I especially wish that for those managing a remote
>> system with little or no physical access.=20
>
> Well I ju
On Sunday 31 Mar 2013 21:19:18 Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2013-03-31 3:37 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > What the article didn't mention was that if you change your interface
> > names, you have to create a new symlink in /etc/init.d and add it to
> > the default runlevel. I'm glad I spotted that one bef
On 31/03/2013 21:44, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2013-03-31 3:14 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> A copy of the ebuild for the*currently*installed* package is in
>> /var/db/pkg//-/*ebuild
>
> Oh... so I should use that instead of what is in /usr/portage/sys-fs?
>
I don't know which one you should use.
On 31/03/2013 22:24, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2013-03-31 3:56 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 15:44:49 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
>>
A copy of the ebuild for the*currently*installed* package is in
/var/db/pkg//-/*ebuild
>>>
>>> Oh... so I should use that instead of what is in
Any of you admin types out there have any grumpy thoughts about this
article? :) Is it really just marketing BS from cloudflare, or is it
solid stuff?
http://blog.cloudflare.com/the-ddos-that-almost-broke-the-internet
On 01/04/2013 01:12, walt wrote:
> Any of you admin types out there have any grumpy thoughts about this
> article? :) Is it really just marketing BS from cloudflare, or is it
> solid stuff?
>
> http://blog.cloudflare.com/the-ddos-that-almost-broke-the-internet
>
>
A quick scan of the article
On 01/04/13 01:01, Dale wrote:
> Pandu Poluan wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Since it's obvious that upsteam has this "my way or the highway"
>> mentality, I'm curious about whether eudev (and mdev) exhibits the
>> same behavior...
>>
>> Rgds,
>> --
>>
>
> I synced yesterday and I didn't see the news alert.
On 03/31/2013 07:12 PM, walt wrote:
> Any of you admin types out there have any grumpy thoughts about this
> article? :) Is it really just marketing BS from cloudflare, or is it
> solid stuff?
>
> http://blog.cloudflare.com/the-ddos-that-almost-broke-the-internet
>
>
Can't tell one way or anot
On 3/31/2013 19:12, walt wrote:
> Any of you admin types out there have any grumpy thoughts about this
> article? :) Is it really just marketing BS from cloudflare, or is it
> solid stuff?
>
> http://blog.cloudflare.com/the-ddos-that-almost-broke-the-internet
>
>
Some other good reads:
http://
Am 01.04.2013 01:12, schrieb walt:
> Any of you admin types out there have any grumpy thoughts about this
> article? :) Is it really just marketing BS from cloudflare, or is it
> solid stuff?
>
> http://blog.cloudflare.com/the-ddos-that-almost-broke-the-internet
>
>
>
and since pretty much every t
Am 31.03.2013 21:55, schrieb Neil Bothwick:
> On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 15:40:09 +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
>
>>> instead of pushing a completely
>>> different (and possibly less reliable) naming scheme by default.
>> Whilst I wouldn't want them changing on me (though if your physically
>> changing t
I've spent a lot of today trying to fix a glitch in starting 'dhcpcd'
after upgrading to udev-200 ; I outlined it in a msg to gentoo-dev .
When I tried to start my I/net connection, I got this :
root:501 ~> dhcpcd
dhcpcd[831]: version 5.6.7 starting
... [delay]
^C
... [long de
130331 walt wrote:
> Any of you admin types out there have any grumpy thoughts about this ?
> http://blog.cloudflare.com/the-ddos-that-almost-broke-the-internet
There was a good story in 'Guardian' :
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/mar/29/cyberwar-spun-shoddy-journalism
--
=
Anyone got ZFS working on their Gentoo install? I'm contemplating it, but
the wiki[1] confuses me a bit. Specifically, section '3 Installing into the
kernel directory (for static installs)' states:
This will generate the needed files, and copy them into the kernel sources
directory.
root # (cd /var
On 03/31/2013 10:00 PM, Philip Webb wrote:
> 130331 walt wrote:
>> Any of you admin types out there have any grumpy thoughts about this ?
>> http://blog.cloudflare.com/the-ddos-that-almost-broke-the-internet
>
> There was a good story in 'Guardian' :
>
>
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfr
on 2013-03-31 at 23:05 Michael Mol wrote:
> On 03/31/2013 10:00 PM, Philip Webb wrote:
> >
> > There was a good story in 'Guardian' :
> >
> >
> > http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/mar/29/cyberwar-spun-shoddy-journalism
> >
>
> The Gizmodo article that Guardian article lauds irrit
luis jure wrote:
> on 2013-03-31 at 23:05 Michael Mol wrote:
>
>> On 03/31/2013 10:00 PM, Philip Webb wrote:
>>> There was a good story in 'Guardian' :
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/mar/29/cyberwar-spun-shoddy-journalism
>>>
>> The Gizmodo article that Guardian article
Hi,
are there any experience regarding the Perixx PERIPAD-501 when used
in conjunction with Linux? Will it work? Are there any limitations?
Thank you very much in advance for any help!
Best regards,
mcc
On Apr 1, 2013 2:10 AM, "Alan McKinnon" wrote:
>
> On 31/03/2013 20:26, Dale wrote:
> > Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg) wrote:
> >> On 2013-03-31, Dale wrote:
> >>> Pandu Poluan wrote:
>
>
> Since it's obvious that upsteam has this "my way or the highway"
> mentality, I'm curious abo
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 21:34:51 +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> > What about USB network adaptors? A user may not even realise they
> > plugged it into a different USB slot from last time, yet the device
> > name changes.
>
> Fair point but wouldn't that be only if you plug in two of the same
> typ
On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 03:02:51 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > What about USB network adaptors? A user may not even realise they
> > plugged it into a different USB slot from last time, yet the device
> > name changes.
> congratulation, you just found another reason why today's udev sucks.
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 15:40:09 +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> I find the OpenBSD method of different names like fxp0 usefuk
You can emulate that with suitable (e)udev rules.
--
Neil Bothwick
Computers are like Old Testament gods; lots of rules and no mercy.
signature.asc
Description: PGP sign
On Apr 1, 2013 1:54 PM, "Neil Bothwick" wrote:
>
> On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 21:34:51 +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
>
> > > What about USB network adaptors? A user may not even realise they
> > > plugged it into a different USB slot from last time, yet the device
> > > name changes.
> >
> > Fair point bu
60 matches
Mail list logo
