On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 11:51 AM, James wrote:
> Cisco sales reps are the best at flushing out cisco problems,
> particularly if a potential sales is on the line
that's a good point, and I might end up going down that route. I found
that they expect the 'deprecated OSS api for ALSA' to be pre
On 2013-02-03 9:08 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
So what we have here is a piece of FOSS software that is too fucking
clever for it's own good. It's applying insane validation checks to
things that are not in any spec at all:
I never liked the auto-config behavior, but it isn't *that* bad...
You w
A little more infromation would help. like what webserver, what kind of
requests, etc
-Kevin
On 02/06/2013 07:13 PM, Grant wrote:
> I have a script that makes 6 successive HTTP requests via
> LWP::UserAgent. It runs fine and takes only about 3 seconds, but
> whenever it is run I start receiving
Hello all
I'm encountering a bug when emerging spidermonkey.
The output from build.log is attached.
If you need more info, please tell me so.
Thanks.
--
Greetings
Elias
[32;01m * [39;49;00mPackage:dev-lang/spidermonkey-1.8.5-r1
[32;01m * [39;49;00mRepository: gentoo
[32;01m * [39;
After much battling with cross compiling and stuff, I decided to use the stage3.
This is what I get when I try to launch python:
Fatal Python error: Py_Initialize: can't initialize sys standard streams
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python3.2/io.py", line 60, in
Aborted
What
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:49 PM, Elias Diem wrote:
> Hello all
>
> I'm encountering a bug when emerging spidermonkey.
>
> The output from build.log is attached.
>
> If you need more info, please tell me so.
>
> Thanks.
>
Seems like one. Try compiling an older version?
--
Nilesh Govindrajan
http
On 2013-02-03 12:51 PM, Alex Schuster wrote:
The question is not whether to halt the build or not (that cannot and
>will not be done) but how to do the communication:
>
>- news item
There is one, from 2013-01-23, ending with 'Apologies if this news came
too late for you.'
Okay, if that one cam
On Thursday 07 February 2013 17:40:39 Tanstaafl wrote:
> So, since I have:
> > shm/dev/shm tmpfs nodev,nosuid,noexec 0 0
>
> I change the type tmpfs to devtmpfs... ok...
I think that's a mistake (because I did it too!) - you only need to change
the tile type of a /dev line, not
Hi Nilesh
On 2013-02-07, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
> Seems like one. Try compiling an older version?
I'm about to try. I will report back.
--
Greetings
Elias
I have kde-base/korganizer-4.9.5 installed with USE "handbook -aqua
-debug -kontact", but trying to view the handbook for korganizer in the
KDE Help Center gets me the "Document not Found" page. Checking
online, the document does exist*, albeit a couple of years old.
Is this a bug in the ebuild o
On 07/02/2013 17:55, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2013-02-03 9:08 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> So what we have here is a piece of FOSS software that is too fucking
>> clever for it's own good. It's applying insane validation checks to
>> things that are not in any spec at all:
>
> I never liked the auto-
On 2013-02-07 12:53 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Thursday 07 February 2013 17:40:39 Tanstaafl wrote:
So, since I have:
shm/dev/shm tmpfs nodev,nosuid,noexec 0 0
I change the type tmpfs to devtmpfs... ok...
I think that's a mistake (because I did it too!) - you only need t
On 2013-02-07 3:28 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Enter a password, the wizard tries to validate it
Don't enter a password, the wizard prompts you for one
Get past that (using $MAGIC of course) it still tries to validate that
the server is up and something is running there.
The only way round that is
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2013-02-07 12:53 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>>
>> On Thursday 07 February 2013 17:40:39 Tanstaafl wrote:
>>
>>> So, since I have:
shm/dev/shm tmpfs nodev,nosuid,noexec 0 0
>>>
>>>
>>> I change the type tmpfs to devtmp
On 2013-02-07 4:25 PM, Paul Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
I think that a lot of people will misread that like I (we) did...
I believe he is correct and /dev/shm is irrelevant for this discussion.
Ok, thanks, but... and no offense...
I am not willing to g
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Paul Hartman
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
>> On 2013-02-07 12:53 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thursday 07 February 2013 17:40:39 Tanstaafl wrote:
>>>
So, since I have:
>
> shm/dev/shm tmpfs nodev,nosui
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2013-02-07 4:25 PM, Paul Hartman wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Tanstaafl
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I think that a lot of people will misread that like I (we) did...
>
>
>> I believe he is correct and /dev/shm is irrelevant for this dis
On Thu, 7 Feb 2013 16:00:06 -0600
Alecks Gates wrote:
> My kernel .config (linux-3.7.4-gentoo) has the following:
> CONFIG_DEVTMPFS=y
> CONFIG_DEVTMPFS_MOUNT=y
>
> I believe the automount is the important part, as I do recall someone
> else on this list missing that. My /etc/fstab has neither /
On 02/03/2013 03:51 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> How do I get Thunderbird to act like software and not assume it knows
> better than I do?
Same way you get your wife to do what you want :)
The confusing part about thunderbird account creation is that there's
more than one way to create a new accoun
On 02/07/2013 09:19 AM, Elias Diem wrote:
> Hello all
>
> I'm encountering a bug when emerging spidermonkey.
>
> The output from build.log is attached.
This is from your build.log:
./system-headers | /usr/bin/perl ./make-system-wrappers.pl system_wrappers_js
./host_jskwgen
/var/tmp/portage/dev
On 08/02/2013 01:43, walt wrote:
> On 02/03/2013 03:51 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> How do I get Thunderbird to act like software and not assume it knows
>> better than I do?
>
> Same way you get your wife to do what you want :)
Oh no, not that, that's unpossible :-)
>
> The confusing part about
On 07/02/2013 23:37, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2013-02-07 4:25 PM, Paul Hartman wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Tanstaafl
>> wrote:
>>> I think that a lot of people will misread that like I (we) did...
>
>> I believe he is correct and /dev/shm is irrelevant for this discussion.
>
> Ok, th
22 matches
Mail list logo
