> Does it not display any errors?
No - no errors, straight to the grub2 command line.
> This menu entry looks good to me
> (only difference here is kernel version, UUIDs and root partition).
> Sounds like it may not be installed correctly... just to confirm here
> are the few things you should ha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 29.07.2012 09:13, Adam Carter wrote:
>> Does it not display any errors?
>
> No - no errors, straight to the grub2 command line.
>
>> This menu entry looks good to me (only difference here is kernel
>> version, UUIDs and root partition). Sounds lik
For you weirdos who track Linus's git repo every day, and who use the
proprietary nvidia-drivers, you need to make this change to the nvidia
code for their kernel module (nvidia.ko):
--- /usr/src/nv/nv-acpi.c.orig 2012-07-29 04:09:03.336096276 -0700
+++ /usr/src/nv/nv-acpi.c 2012-07-29 04:0
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 6:46 AM, walt wrote:
> For you weirdos who track Linus's git repo every day, and who use the
> proprietary nvidia-drivers, you need to make this change to the nvidia
> code for their kernel module (nvidia.ko):
>
> --- /usr/src/nv/nv-acpi.c.orig 2012-07-29 04:09:03.33609627
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 2:13 AM, Adam Carter wrote:
>> Does it not display any errors?
>
> No - no errors, straight to the grub2 command line.
>
>> This menu entry looks good to me
>> (only difference here is kernel version, UUIDs and root partition).
>> Sounds like it may not be installed correct
Thanks for all the comments so far: HTH other users.
I am struck by the huge difference in price between Intel/AMD :
at Canada Computers -- a very reliable store in my experience since 2000 --
Intel's price range is CAD 200 - 240 ,
AMD's CAD 130 - 180 with an outlier FX-8150 at CAD 220 .
For
On 30/07/12 05:23, Philip Webb wrote:
Do I need > 4 cores ?
If you do video encoding, run chess analysis or are building software
all day long, a 6 core helps. But you don't "need" them. You only need
1 core.
i5-2550K & FX-4100 both use 95 W
(some of the more costly AMDs use 125 W ).
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 01:41:33AM +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Saturday 28 July 2012 21:19:44 Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> > I use both:
>
> Me too (sorry), though I find myself using oldconfig more often than
> menuconfig these days, unless I want to comb right through the config
> looking f
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 9:23 PM, Philip Webb wrote:
-snip-
> Also, some comments implied that Intels have a built-in GPU :
> if so, would that save the cost of a graphics card ?
> how would it compare to an Nvidia card ? how reliable are the drivers ?
>
> --
> ,,==
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 30/07/12 05:23, Philip Webb wrote:
>> i5-2550K & FX-4100 both use 95 W
>> (some of the more costly AMDs use 125 W ).
>
>
> Note that power savings are not important if you're not using a laptop. CPU
> power savings on a desktop don
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 10:23 PM, Philip Webb wrote:
> Thanks for all the comments so far: HTH other users.
>
> I am struck by the huge difference in price between Intel/AMD :
> at Canada Computers -- a very reliable store in my experience since 2000 --
> Intel's price range is CAD 200 - 240 ,
>
On 30/07/12 06:08, Michael Mol wrote:
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 30/07/12 05:23, Philip Webb wrote:
i5-2550K & FX-4100 both use 95 W
(some of the more costly AMDs use 125 W ).
Note that power savings are not important if you're not using a laptop. CPU
p
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 30/07/12 06:08, Michael Mol wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Nikos Chantziaras
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 30/07/12 05:23, Philip Webb wrote:
i5-2550K & FX-4100 both use 95 W
(some of the more costly AMDs use
On 30/07/12 07:28, Michael Mol wrote:
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 30/07/12 06:08, Michael Mol wrote:
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Nikos Chantziaras
wrote:
On 30/07/12 05:23, Philip Webb wrote:
i5-2550K & FX-4100 both use 95 W
(some of the more cost
14 matches
Mail list logo
